Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Two Bioactive Materials in Revascularization of Immature Young Permanent Teeth: Randomize Control Trial | ||||
Al-Azhar Assiut Dental Journal | ||||
Volume 8, Issue 1, April 2025, Page 87-97 PDF (2.03 MB) | ||||
Document Type: Original Article | ||||
DOI: 10.21608/aadj.2025.347161.1199 | ||||
![]() | ||||
Authors | ||||
Reda Mohammed Elsayed ![]() ![]() | ||||
1Department of Pedodontics and Oral Health , Faculty of Den tistry, Al-Azhar University, As siut Branch, Assiut, Egypt. | ||||
2Department of Pedodontics and Oral Health , Faculty of Dentistry, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Boyes), Egypt. | ||||
3Department of Pedodontics and Oral Health , Faculty of Dentistry, Al-Azhar University, Assiut Branch, Assiut, Egypt. | ||||
Abstract | ||||
Aim: The advantages of two bioactive coronal plug materials Bioceramic Root Repair vs. Bio-MTA for the revascularization of necrotic, immature, permanent teeth with apical periodontitis were assessed from a clinical and radiographic standpoint in this randomized clinical trial (RCT). Subject and Methods: Children between the ages of seven and twelve who had apical periodontitis in twenty-eight permanent, immature, non-vital teeth participated in this RCT. Samples were randomized into two groups according to type the coronal plug materials used: Bioceramic Root Repair (group I) and Bio-MTA (mineral trioxide aggregate) (group II) (n = 14). A clinical and radiographic follow-up was conducted for a one year in order to evaluate the level of clinical success and efficacy in apical root closure. Results: With respect to the level of clinical success, every single instance (100%) accomplished the main objective, which was the eradication of symptoms and the demonstration of bone healing. There was no significant difference between the groups (p > 0.05). Clinical results for both bioceramic cements were good. For every individual studied group, there was a significant increase in the apical dentin root thickness over time, nevertheless, the differences between the two examined groups were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Bioceramic cements might be regarded as viable materials for the revascularization of non-vital immature permanent teeth with apical periodontitis. | ||||
Keywords | ||||
Bio-MTA; Bioceramic; Root Repair; Revascularization; Immature Permanent Teeth | ||||
Statistics Article View: 81 PDF Download: 78 |
||||