Clinical Time of the Self-Adhesive Bulk-fill Composite Versus Nanohybrid Composite in Cervical Lesions –A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial | ||||
| Journal of Fundamental and Clinical Research | ||||
| Article 8, Volume 5, Issue 1, June 2025, Page 65-77 PDF (563.65 K) | ||||
| Document Type: Original research articles | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/jfcr.2025.312105.1090 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Author | ||||
Riham Kamal ElShazly  
| ||||
| Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Oral & Dental Medicine, Misr International University (MIU), Cairo, Egypt | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| Introduction: Restorative materials have evolved toward simpler, faster applications. Incrementally-layered composite resins, while improved, still face long chair-side issues. Self-adhesive bulk-fill resins offer a solution by allowing thicker layers and reducing procedure time. Aim: To assess the clinical time of the novel material, Surefil One (SuO), against the conventional composite, Neo Spectra (NS), in cervical cavities. Materials and Methods: Fifty-four cervical cavities were prepared and divided into right and left sides in a split-mouth design and one side was filled with SuO and the alternative side receive NS. Operatory time (Minutes) was measured and compared between both materials starting from cavity preparation and terminating after polishing was done utilizing a stop watch. Results: SuO showed lower mean clinical time than NS. Conclusion: Utilizing a material that has both advantages of being self-adhesive and bulk-filled reduces the chairside time. Recommendation: Further long-term clinical studies are warranted to assess the stability and clinical performance of this material. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| Surefil One; self-adhesive; bulk-fill; nano-hybrid; operatory time | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 13 PDF Download: 8 |
||||
