THE ROLE OF POST-OCCUPANCY EVALUATION IN IMPROVING OF OFFICE BUILDING’S ENVIRONMENT | ||
| JES. Journal of Engineering Sciences | ||
| Article 11, Volume 54, Issue 1, January 2026, Pages 1-22 PDF (784.6 K) | ||
| Document Type: Research Paper | ||
| DOI: 10.21608/jesaun.2025.381287.1501 | ||
| Authors | ||
| Khadija Elsayed Shakra1; Serif Mohamed Ali2; Magdy Mohamed Elnahas3; Heba Saeed Mahmoud4; Bahaa Elboshy* 5 | ||
| 1Department of Architectural Construction Technology, Faculty of Technology and Education Beni Suef University, Egypt. | ||
| 2Department of Civil and Architectural Construction Technology, Faculty of Technology and Education Suez University, Egypt. | ||
| 3Architectural Engineering Department, Higher Institute of Engineering and Technology; Arish, Egypt | ||
| 4Department of Civil and Architectural Construction Technology, Faculty of Technology and Education - Suez University, Egypt. | ||
| 5Arch. Eng. Dept., Tanta University, Egypt. | ||
| Abstract | ||
| Employee well-being and productivity are paramount in today's work environments. However, the impact of interior design on these factors in Egyptian engineering offices remains a mystery. This study bridges this knowledge gap through a post-occupancy evaluation (POE) approach, examining how various design elements influence occupant experiences and work outcomes in two selected buildings. The dearth of in-depth POE studies in Egypt necessitates a deeper exploration of the relationship between interior design and workplace performance. Visual relief, thermal comfort, indoor air quality, lighting design, and architectural style hold immense potential for optimizing office environments. Employing a meticulous POE methodology, the research gathers comprehensive data from building occupants through surveys, interviews, and thorough walkthrough evaluations. The study unveils nuanced insights into how interior design shapes workplace experiences by delving into occupant perceptions and preferences and physically assessing the workspace. Preliminary findings from the POE process suggest that architectural design significantly impacts visual relief and spatial comfort. The importance of natural light and proper ventilation in enhancing occupants' well-being and productivity is highlighted. These findings emphasize the crucial role of thoughtful interior design in fostering conducive work environments within Egyptian engineering offices. This research advocates for further POE studies to refine workplace design practices specific to this context. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Post-Occupancy Evaluation; Indoor Environmental Quality; Occupant Satisfaction; Administrative Building; Egypt | ||
| References | ||
|
[1] M. A. Hassanain, M. O. Sanni-Anibire, and A. S. Mahmoud, “Design quality assessment of campus facilities through post occupancy evaluation,” International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 693–712, Aug. 2023, Doi: 10.1108/IJBPA-04-2021-0057.
[2] M. A. Hassanain and M. S. Mahroos, “A preliminary post-occupancy evaluation of the built-environment in office buildings: a case study from Saudi Arabia,” Property Management, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 564–581, Jul. 2023, Doi: 10.1108/PM-11-2022-0089.
[3] P. Li, T. M. Froese, and G. Brager, “Post-occupancy evaluation: State-of-the-art analysis and state-of-the-practice review,” Apr. 01, 2018, Elsevier Ltd. Doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.02.024.
[4] M. Al Mughairi, T. Beach, and Y. Rezgui, “Post-occupancy evaluation for enhancing building performance and automation deployment,” Journal of Building Engineering, vol. 77, Oct. 2023, Doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2023.107388.
[5] A. A. Aliyu and M. S. Muhammad, “A REVIEW OF POST-OCCUPANCY EVALUATION AS A TOOL AND CRITERIA FOR ASSESSING BUILDING PERFORMANCE,” 2016. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/303382704
[6] M. Elsayed, S. Pelsmakers, L. Pistore, R. Castaño-Rosa, and P. Romagnoni, “Post-occupancy evaluation in residential buildings: A systematic literature review of current practices in the EU,” May 15, 2023, Elsevier Ltd. Doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.110307.
[7] H. Tang, Y. Ding, and B. C. Singer, “Post-occupancy evaluation of indoor environmental quality in ten nonresidential buildings in Chongqing, China,” 2020.
[8] F. Lolli, S. Marinello, A. M. Coruzzolo, and M. A. Butturi, “Post-Occupancy Evaluation’s (POE) Applications for Improving Indoor Environment Quality (IEQ),” Oct. 01, 2022, MDPI. Doi: 10.3390/toxics10100626.
[9] T. Shao, “Indoor Environment Intelligent Control System of Green Building Based on PMV Index,” Advances in Civil Engineering, vol. 2021, 2021, Doi: 10.1155/2021/6619401.
[10] M. Kassem, Y. Hijazi, and H. Al Shanwani, “Building automation system of office buildings in Egypt: A Comparative Study,” International Design Journal, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 221–230, Jul. 2019, Doi: 10.21608/idj.2019.82827.
[11] E. Shokry, Y. Shokry, P. Mohamed, A. Mandour, A. Inas, and A.-E. Ahmed, “A Methodological Framework for Enhancing the Modern Office Spaces and Solving their Problems,” 2023.
[12] Federal Facilities Council, “LEARNING FROM OUR BUILDINGS A State-of-the-Practice Summary of Post-Occupancy Evaluation Federal Facilities Council,” 2001.
[13] K. Hadjri and C. Crozier, “Post-occupancy evaluation: Purpose, benefits and barriers,” Facilities, vol. 27, no. 1–2, pp. 21–33, 2009, Doi: 10.1108/02632770910923063.
[14] M. A. Hassanain, M. O. Sanni-Anibire, and A. S. Mahmoud, “An assessment of users’ satisfaction with a smart building on university campus through post-occupancy evaluation,” Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 2022, Doi: 10.1108/JEDT-12-2021-0714.
[15] K. Hadjri and C. Crozier, “Post-occupancy evaluation: Purpose, benefits and barriers,” Facilities, vol. 27, no. 1–2, pp. 21–33, 2009, Doi: 10.1108/02632770910923063.
[16] I. O. Durosaiye, K. Hadjri, and C. L. Liyanage, “A critique of post-occupancy evaluation in the UK,” Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 345–352, Mar. 2019, Doi: 10.1007/s10901-019-09646-2.
[17] V. De Giuli, O. Da Pos, and M. De Carli, “Indoor environmental quality and pupil perception in Italian primary schools,” Build Environ, vol. 56, pp. 335–345, Oct. 2012, Doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.03.024.
[18] D. Artan Ilter and E. Ergen, “A Critical Review of Post-Occupancy Evaluation (POE) Tools,” 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328783053
[19] M. Esfandiari, S. Mohamed Zaid, and M. A. Ismail, “Investigating the Indoor Environment Quality Parameters and Their Relationship with Occupants’ Satisfaction in Office Buildings: A Review,” Journal of Design and Built Environment, pp. 181–194, Dec. 2017, Doi: 10.22452/jdbe.sp2017no1.15.
[20] W.S. Moustafa, M. M. Abdelrahman, I. R. Hegazy, “Building performance assessment of user behaviour as a post occupancy evaluation indicator: Case study on youth housing in Egypt,” Build Simul, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 389–403, Apr. 2018, Doi: 10.1007/s12273-017-0395-7.
[21] A. M. A. B. Adel Mohammad A. Binyaseen, “Workplace Environment and Productivity: Employees’ Reaction towards the Quality of Physical Environment in Rented Saudi Workplaces,” journal of king abdulaziz university environmental design Science, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 123–135, Jan. 2009, Doi: 10.4197/Env.6-1.6.
[22] K. Sailer, A. Budgen, N. Lonsdale, A. Turner, and A. Penn, “Pre and Post Occupancy Evaluations in Workplace Environments Theoretical Reflections and Practical Implications,” Online Publication Date, 2010. [Online]. Available: http://www.journalofspacesyntax.org/
[23] M. Tedja, M. Septiani, and N. Noegroho, “A Study about office space needs with consideration of supply and demand for office buildings in Jakarta,” IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci, vol. 794, no. 1, p. 012219, Jul. 2021, Doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/794/1/012219.
[24] M. Tedja, M. Septiani, and N. Noegroho, “A Study about office space needs with consideration of supply and demand for office buildings in Jakarta,” IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci, vol. 794, no. 1, p. 012219, Jul. 2021, Doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/794/1/012219. | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 274 PDF Download: 137 |
||
