Assessing Conventional and Ultrasonic Irrigation for Debris and Smear Layer Removal in Primary Teeth: An In Vitro Scanning Electron Microscopy Study | ||
| Egyptian Dental Journal | ||
| Volume 71, Issue 3 - Serial Number 1, July 2025, Pages 1975-1993 PDF (2.43 M) | ||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||
| DOI: 10.21608/edj.2025.368544.3460 | ||
| Authors | ||
| rashed alaskar* 1; Salwa Mohamed Awad2; Hossam Elsherbiny Hammouda3 | ||
| 1MSc, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt | ||
| 2Professor of Pediatric Dentistry Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University | ||
| 3Lecturer of Pediatric Dentistry Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University | ||
| Abstract | ||
| This in vitro study compared the efficacy of conventional irrigation with a lateral vent needle using 2.5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) versus ultrasonic irrigation with 2.5% NaOCl in removing debris and smear layer from primary molars. Twenty-eight primary molars were randomly assigned to two groups (n=14 each). After standardized root canal preparation, Group I underwent conventional irrigation, and Group II received ultrasonic irrigation. Debris and smear layer were evaluated using a Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) at 200× and 1000× magnifications, respectively, across coronal, middle, and apical thirds, with scores ranging from 1 (clean) to 5 (dirty). Statistical analysis using ANOVA and Mann-Whitney U tests revealed that ultrasonic irrigation significantly outperformed conventional irrigation in debris and smear layer removal across all root canal thirds (p < 0.001). The apical third showed the highest debris and smear layer scores in both groups, but ultrasonic irrigation consistently achieved lower scores. These findings suggest that ultrasonic irrigation with 2.5% NaOCl is more effective for enhancing root canal cleanliness in primary teeth, potentially improving pulpectomy outcomes. Further clinical studies are needed to validate these results. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Primary teeth; pulpectomy; ultrasonic irrigation; smear layer; debris removal | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 215 PDF Download: 85 |
||
