Comparative study between olecranon osteotomy and triceps sparing approaches in supracondylar intercon-dylar humerus fractures fixation | ||||
| The Egyptian Orthopaedic Journal | ||||
| Volume 59, Issue 4, March 2025, Page 512-518 PDF (2.29 MB) | ||||
| DOI: 10.4103/eoj.eoj_110_23 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
| Hesham H. Refae; Mohamed A. Elmoneim Hussien; Abdallah M. Mahmoud; Mohamed S. Mahmoud | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| Background Open reduction and internal fixation is the standard of supracondylar intercondylar (SCIC) humerus fracture treatment and several approaches described to achieve best fractures visualization and anatomical reduction. Objective To compare functional outcome of SCIC humerus fracture managed by the olecranon osteotomy and triceps sparing approach. Patients and methods We conducted this prospective interventional study on patients presented with SCIC humerus fracture. Outcome measures were evaluated with Mayo Elbow Performance Score. Serial plain radiographies were used for radiological evaluation. Results Twenty patients in the study were randomly divided into two groups of 10 (50%) patients each. Mean age of group A was 44 + 19.17 years and that of group B was 28.4 + 10.25 years. In group A 70% of patients had satisfactory outcome and 30% of patient had unsatisfactory outcome. In group B 60% of patients had satisfactory outcome and 4% of patient were unsatisfactory. Conclusion Olecranon osteotomy provide better visualization specially in cases associated with comminuted articular surface while triceps sparing considered enough in cases associated with simple articular fracture. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| olecranon osteotomy; supracondylar intercondylar humerus fracture; Triceps sparing | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 26 PDF Download: 8 |
||||
