In-vitro susceptibility of ESBL producing Gram negative bacilli to ceftriaxone-sulbactam-disodium-EDTA combination in a north IIndian tertiary care hospital. | ||||
Microbes and Infectious Diseases | ||||
Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript, Available Online from 04 July 2025 | ||||
Document Type: Original Article | ||||
DOI: 10.21608/mid.2025.366254.2606 | ||||
![]() | ||||
Authors | ||||
Nargis Bali1; Anjum Ara Mir ![]() | ||||
1Department of Microbiology, Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Soura, India | ||||
2Department of Respiratory and Pulmonary Medicine, Apollo Hospital, New Delhi, India | ||||
3Department of Microbiology, Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Soura. India | ||||
4Department of Microbiology Govt Medical College, Anantnag, India | ||||
Abstract | ||||
Background: The study was undertaken to evaluate the in-vitro efficacy of Ceftriaxone-sulbactam- EDTA (CSE) combination in clinical isolates of GNB especially those expressing extended spectrum beta lactamase (ESBL) and to compare the sensitivity of CSE to meropenem. Methods: Clinical samples received in our laboratory from patients admitted at our hospital from January 2024 to June 2024 were processed for the recovery of Gram negative bacilli (GNB). The antimicrobial susceptibility of these isolates was performed by disc diffusion method and ESBL production confirmed by combined disc susceptibility test (CDST) as per guidelines. Statistical analysis was done by SPSS v 22. Results: A total of 672 GNB were part of the study. Majority of the isolates were recovered from pus samples and the most common GNB recovered was Acinetobacter baumannii. The GNB exhibited variable sensitivity to the tested antibiotics. ESBL production was seen in 30.2% of GNB. Overall sensitivity of CSE in GNB was 89.7% and it was 87.7% in ESBL producing isolates. Meropenem was sensitive in 71% GNB and 29% isolates were resistant to it. All meropenem sensitive GNB were sensitive to CSE as well and 64.6% meropenem resistant isolates were found to be sensitive to CSE. Conclusion: CSE can be used as a carbapenem sparing agent and can also be a part of the empirical drug regimen in place for patients suffering from bacterial infections at our hospital. | ||||
Keywords | ||||
Antimicrobial resistance; Adjuvants; Carbapenems; Gram negative bacilli | ||||
Statistics Article View: 69 |
||||