Establishing Design Criteria for Hobby Garden Huts: A Case Study at Selcuk University | ||||
| JES. Journal of Engineering Sciences | ||||
| Article 16, Volume 53, Issue 5, September and October 2025, Page 756-772 PDF (889.85 K) | ||||
| Document Type: Research Paper | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/jesaun.2025.390924.1533 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
Ali AKCAOVA   1; Ahmet AKAY 2
| ||||
| 1Interior Architecture, Faculty of Architecture and Design, Selcuk University, Konya, Turkey. aliakcaova@selcuk.edu.tr | ||||
| 2Department of Landscape Architecture Faculty of Architecture and Design, Selçuk University, Konya, Turkey. ahmetakay@selcuk.edu.tr | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| This study aims at developing standardized design criteria for the hobby gardens at Selçuk University, ensuring compatibility with environmental conditions, enhancing aesthetic value, prioritizing user satisfaction, and catering specifically to the institution's context. The study was conducted within the hobby garden in the Alaeddin Keykubat campus of Selçuk University. The extant parcels in the hobby garden have 70 m2 of open space for the landscape design area and 20 m2 of semi-open and closed space on hard ground for the hut design area. Two distinct questionnaires were utilized in the study. In the initial phase, a preliminary test was conducted, with the involvement of design professionals. In this preliminary stage, 30 huts previously designed by experts were presented to a panel of professionals for their opinion on various criteria such as color, material and form, and the 15 huts with the highest scores were selected. A questionnaire was then administered to the existing users of the hobby garden through the identified huts. The aim of this questionnaire is to determine the hut design criteria. Based on these criteria, the 2 most successful hut designs in terms of spatial quality and social cohesion were determined. The data collected were subsequently analyzed using the SPSS statistical software. The study employed the psychometric measurement method. The survey was designed using a 5-point Likert-type measurement model, in which 1 denotes a negative value and 5 a positive one. The study used the independent t-test, frequency analysis, normality test, and Cronbach Alpha reliability analysis. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| Hobby garden; Cottage Design Criteria; Space Design | ||||
| References | ||||
|
[1] Tapur, T. (2018). Hobby gardens in Konya city center. Journal of Turkish Islamic Civilization Academic Research, 13(25), 109-122.
[2] Koçyiğit, M., & Yıldız, M. (2014). Recreation Practices in Local Governments: Konya Example. International Journal of Science Culture and Sport, Special Issue (2), 211-223. https://doi.org/10.14486/IJSCS193.
[3] Karaküçük, S. (1997). Recreation (use of leisure time), concept, scope and a research, Ankara: Seren Ofset. Second edition.
[4] Uslu, A., & Shakouri, N. (2013). Green infrastructure and opportunities to support biodiversity in urban landscape. Turkish Journal of Scientific Reviews, 6(1), 46-50.
[5] Tuna, M., (2013). Environmental Sociology. Anadolu University Open Education Faculty Publication, Eskişehir.
[6] Erduran, F., & Sülüşoğlu, M. (2006). The importance of hobby gardens in urban ecology and development and the Kocaeli-İzmit example. 6th National Ecology and Environment Congress Booklet. İzmir.
[7] Demircan, N., & Sezen, I. (2018). A proposal for a garden design allocated to individuals in Erzurum. ATA Planning and Design Journal, 2(2), 21-33.
[8] Güneroğlu, N., Bekar, M., Aktürk, E., & Dihkan, A. (2018). Hobby gardens in urban green area systems; Karadeniz Technical University Kanuni Campus example. Journal of Social and Huminities Science Research, 5(25), 2253-2263.
[9] Birky, J. (. (2009). The modern community garden movement in the United States: Its roots, its current condition and its prospects for the future. (Master dissertation, University of South Florida, Department of Geography, Florida).
[10] Ozkan, M. B., Kucukerbas, V., Kaplan, A., Hepcan, S., Malkoc Yigit, E., & Sonmez, H. (2023). Master Plan Study in the Context of Public Outdoor Spaces of Muğla City. Ege University Press, Izmir.
[11] Yilmaz, H., Turgut, H., & Demircan, T. (2006). Determination of the views of Erzurum city residents on hobby gardens. Suleyman Demirel University Forestry Faculty Journal, A (1), 96-110.
[12] Ozkan, B., Kaplan, A., Aslan, N., & Kilic, H. (1996). A research on the development of urban small garden parks in our country. Ecology and Environment Journal (18), 18-21.
[13] Aliagaoglu, A., & Alevkayali, A. (2017). Hobby gardens in Balikesir: Features and problems. Marmara Geography Journal(35), 195-203.
[14] Demiralay, R. (2023). Agrotourism-oriented hobby gardens concept approach; Isparta Yalvaç Kızılca Mevkii example. Journal of Protected Areas Research, 2(1), 77-93.
[15] Çildam Yılmaz, S. (2022). An Evaluation of Kezer Campus Hobby Gardens as Urban Green Area Examples. Süleyman Demirel University Social Sciences Institute Journal, 1(42), 89-110.
[16] Aktu, Y. (2016). Life structure of early adulthood in Levinson's theory. Current Approaches in Psychiatry, , 8, 162-177.
[17] Telesetsky, A. (2014). Community-based urban agriculture as affirmative environmental justice. University of Detroit Mercy Law Review, 3(91), 259.
[18] Norwood Bailey, F. (2022). The garden as art, hobby, and the good life. American Society for Horticultural Science, 32(3), 304-312.
[19] Yilmaz, M., & Sahin, K. (2023). Sociological effects of being engaged in hobbies in urban life: Igdir University hobby garden example. Black Sea Social Sciences Journal, 15(28), 206-226.
[20] Yeler, O., Ulay, G., & Akdeniz, S. (2022). Determination of wooden equipment needs and creation of a sample model in hobby garden design: Van Yuzuncu Yil University example. Journal of Furniture and Wood Materials Research, 5(2), 71-82. https://doi.org/10.33725/mamad.
[21] Koc, H. (2003). Urban agriculture, planning in search of more livable settlements. PLANLAMA-PLANNING (1), 34-40.
[22] Bakırcı, H., Artun, H., & Deniz, A. (2019). Examining the opinions of sixth grade secondary school students about hobby gardens. Journal of Science Mathematics Entrepreneurship and Technology Education, 2(1), 36-45.
[23] Reis S, N., Reis, M., & Nascimento, A. (2020). Pandemic, social isolation and the importance of people-plant interaction. Ornamental Horticulture, Ornam. Hortic, 26(3). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1590/2447-536X.v26i3.2185.
[24] Yasak, Ü., Özav, L., & Akbay, M. (2020). Investigation of hobby gardens in Uşak in terms of housing features and usage practices. Journal of Eastern Geography, 25(44), 285-298. https://doi.org/10.17295/ataunidcd.768980
[25] Ortaçeşme, V. (. (2007). Landscape planning in the context of the European landscape convention. Turkish Symposium on the Implementation of the European Landscape Convention. Ankara.: TMMOB Chamber of Landscape Architects.
[26] Tolunay, A., Küçükcoşkun, A., Türkoğlu, T., & Özmiş, M. (2019). The effects of Süleyman Demirel University open green areas and parks on the quality of life of staff and students. Bartın Forestry Faculty Journal, 21(3), 597-612. https://doi.org/10.24011/barofd.561198
[27] Ertekin, M., & Çorbacı, Ö. (2010). Landscape design in university campuses Karabük University landscape project example. Kastamonu University Journal of Forestry Faculty, 10(1), 55-67.
[28] Kiper, T. (2009). Determination of recreational tendencies and demands of Namık Kemal University Faculty of Agriculture (Tekirdağ) students. Tekirdağ Faculty of Agriculture Journal, 6(2), 191-201.
[29] Topay, M., Şahin, C., Onay, B., & Mirza, E. (2021). Landscape design in university campuses: Isparta University of Applied Sciences Kılıçarslan Campus example,. Yalvaç Academy Journal, 6(1), 56-68.
[30] Büyükşahin, S., & Çınar, K. (2012). Examination of common use spaces in university campuses: Selçuk University Aleaddin Keykubat Campus example. S.Ü. Faculty of Engineering and Architecture Journal., 27(3), 61-72.
[31] Tabachnick, B. G., Fidell, L. S., & Ullman, J. B. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (Vol. 6). Boston, MA.: Pearson.
[32] Kaya Ülker Bahar, F. (2016). Corporate identity and corporate design. Design+Theory, 3(4), 27-37.
[33] Un Yung, S. (2006). An integrative approach to university visual identity and reputation. Article in Corporate Reputation Review, 9(4), 258-270.
[34] Faiz, S., & Zorlu, T. (2018). Privacy in traditional houses of the southeastern Anatolia region. The Turkish Online Journal of Design Art and Communication, 8(2), 422-436.
[35] Ergün, R., & Özyılmaz, H. (2022). Comparison of the effect of the concept of privacy on traditional building design: Diyarbakır and Erzurum houses. (2022) Süleyman Demirel University Journal of Science Institute, Volume 26, (Issue 3,), 466-478. https://doi.org/10.19113/sdufenbed.1106841
[36] Ardıçoğlu, R. (2017). Space and architecture shaped by neighborhood, 10th International Sinan Symposium, April 27 – 28th. Edirne: Trakya University. | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 921 PDF Download: 190 |
||||
