Comparative study between oral and vaginal administration of misoprostol in the induction of labour in cases with premature rupture of membranes (PROM)
Fakhr, D., El-Garhy, I., Elomda, F., AbdelRahman, H., Rashed, N. (2644). Comparative study between oral and vaginal administration of misoprostol in the induction of labour in cases with premature rupture of membranes (PROM). EKB Journal Management System, 2023(1), -. doi: 10.58675/2682-339X.1938
Diaa Maged Fakhr; Ismael Talaat El-Garhy; Fahd Abdel-aal Elomda; Hany AbdElhakim AbdelRahman; Nesreen Ahmed Mostafa Rashed. "Comparative study between oral and vaginal administration of misoprostol in the induction of labour in cases with premature rupture of membranes (PROM)". EKB Journal Management System, 2023, 1, 2644, -. doi: 10.58675/2682-339X.1938
Fakhr, D., El-Garhy, I., Elomda, F., AbdelRahman, H., Rashed, N. (2644). 'Comparative study between oral and vaginal administration of misoprostol in the induction of labour in cases with premature rupture of membranes (PROM)', EKB Journal Management System, 2023(1), pp. -. doi: 10.58675/2682-339X.1938
Fakhr, D., El-Garhy, I., Elomda, F., AbdelRahman, H., Rashed, N. Comparative study between oral and vaginal administration of misoprostol in the induction of labour in cases with premature rupture of membranes (PROM). EKB Journal Management System, 2644; 2023(1): -. doi: 10.58675/2682-339X.1938

Comparative study between oral and vaginal administration of misoprostol in the induction of labour in cases with premature rupture of membranes (PROM)

Al-Azhar International Medical Journal
Volume 2023, Issue 1, January 2023  XML
DOI: 10.58675/2682-339X.1938
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Diaa Maged Fakhr1; Ismael Talaat El-Garhy2; Fahd Abdel-aal Elomda2; Hany AbdElhakim AbdelRahman3; Nesreen Ahmed Mostafa Rashed1
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine for girls, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.
2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine for boys, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt
3Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Air force hospital, Cairo, Egypt.
Abstract
Background: Cervical ripening is mediated by membrane-bound G-coupled receptor prostaglandins. Boost leukocyte extravasation and collagenase. Biochemical mechanisms alter the distribution of proteoglycan and collagen, allowing cervical effacement and dilatation. The use of PG gel for induction began in the 1980s. Prior to the 1990s, oral PG was avoided for induction of labour due to its unpleasant gastrointestinal effects. Oral route may improve mother satisfaction more than vaginal route. Aim: What is the difference between the effect of oral and vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor in pregnant females with PROM regarding efficacy, safety, maternal and fetal outcomes? Subject and Methods: 100 Pregnant females presenting at Obstetrics and Gynaecology emergency department at El-Hussein University hospitals. Results: There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding cesarean section indications Neonatal outcomes and Maternal outcomes. Conclusion: Researchers investigated the vaginal and oral safety and efficacy of misoprostol. To obtain the desired results, a different schedule and greater doses were administered. This study demonstrates that oral misoprostol is as safe and effective as its vaginal counterpart. Misoprostol administered orally or vaginally was equally effective for initiating labour in preterm women. To identify the ideal oral and vaginal dosage, additional research is required. In a facility that does emergency C-sections, it can be used to induce labour.
Statistics
Article View: 4