Comparison of Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Quadratus lumborum Block in hip and Proximal Femur Surgery | ||||
| Al-Azhar International Medical Journal | ||||
| Volume 2024, Issue 7, July 2024 | ||||
| DOI: 10.58675/2682-339X.2541 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
| Mohamed Ibrahim; Mohamed Mohamed; Eslam Mohamed | ||||
| Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Management, Faculty of Medicine for Boys, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| Background: The global hip surgery patient group exhibits significant diversity, ranging from physically active young adults who undergo hip arthroscopy to elderly individuals had frailty and various comorbidities. Aim and objectives: To compare between Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) quadratus lumborum block following hip proximal femur surgery under spinal anaesthesia regarding the relief of after-surgery pain. Patients and methods: prospective, randomized double-blinded clinical research performed on sixty individuals in Al-Azhar University Hospitals, in Cairo, after approval by the departmental ethical Committee. patients divided into two groups. Results: There was no statistically significant variance among both groups regarding postoperative VAS following surgery at rest through movement p above 0.05. no statistically significant variance among the two groups regarding pain assessment in terms of morphine consumption, time of analgesia, and patient satisfaction p>0.05. Conclusion: Ultrasound erector spinae block is superior to Ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum in pain scores, length of analgesia, and total analgesic consumption, but without a statistically significant difference. | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 23 |
||||
