Treatment of Gingival Recession by Coronally Advanced Flap with Platelet Rich Fibrin (PRF) Versus Chitosan Film | ||||
| Al-Azhar Journal of Dentistry | ||||
| Volume 2020, Issue 10, October 2020 | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/adjg.2020.13676.1164 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
| Amal Ebrahim1; Olfat Shaker2; Mai Attia3; Aya Abdel Fatah4; Eatemad Shoreibah5 | ||||
| 1Associate Lecturer of Oral Medicine, Periodontology, Oral diagnosis and Radiology Department. Faculty of Dental Medicine for Girls. Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt | ||||
| 2Professor of Bio-Chemistry. Faculty of Medicine. Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt | ||||
| 3Associate Professor of Oral Medicine, Periodontology, Oral diagnosis and Radiology, Department. Faculty of Dental Medicine for Girls. Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt | ||||
| 4Lecturer of Pharmaceutics and industrial pharmacy Faculty of Pharmacy for Girls, Al-Azhar University, , Cairo, Egypt | ||||
| 5Professor of Oral Medicine, Periodontology, Oral diagnosis and Radiology Department. Faculty of Dental Medicine for Girls. Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| Purpose: The intent of the study was for clinical evaluation of management of solitary and numerous Miller’s Class I and Class II gingival recessions by coronally advanced flap combined with PRF or chitosan membrane. Materials and Methods: Randomized study included12 patients with age group ranging between 24-58years with solitary or numerous class I or II gingival recessions in upper and lower anterior teeth. Patients were divided into Group one: managed by coronally advanced flap (CAF) + (PRF).Group two: managed by coronally advanced flap (CAF) + chitosan membrane. Clinical attachment loss (CAL), Recession height (RH) and Recession width (RW) were measured at baseline and after 3months then collected data were analysed using SPSS statistical analysis program. Results: There were significant reductions in CAL, RH and RW of Group one and Group two from baseline to 3 months with statistically significant reduction of CAL and RH in Group two (Coronally Advanced Flap (CAF) + chitosan membrane). Conclusion: The use of chitosan membrane is comparable to PRF in management of Miller’s class I or II gingival recessions except for CAL and RH which were more favorable in Group two (Coronally Advanced Flap (CAF) + chitosan membrane). | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| Gingival recession; coronally advanced flap; Platelet rich fibrin; chitosan film | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 15 |
||||
