Evaluation of Sealing Ability of Totalfill versus ProRoot MTA in Furcal Perforations in Permanent Molars Using Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) | ||
| Al-Azhar Journal of Dentistry | ||
| Volume 9, Issue 4, October 2022, Pages 693-698 PDF (753.2 K) | ||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||
| DOI: 10.21608/adjg.2022.45783.1302 | ||
| Authors | ||
| Noha El Najdi1; Mohamed Mostafa2; Eman Mohamed3 | ||
| 1Dentist at Demerdash Hospital. | ||
| 2Assistant Professor, Head of Pedodontics and oral Health Department, Faculty of Dental Medicine for Girls, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt | ||
| 3Lecturer of Pedodontics and Oral Health Faculty of Dental Medicine for girls Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt. | ||
| Abstract | ||
| Purpose: to evaluate the sealing ability of Totalfill® versus ProRoot MTA in furcal perforations in permanent molars using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). Materials and Methods: Thirty permanent molars were placed in 5% sodium hypochlorite solution and washed with tap water. Access cavities were made using round bur in highspeed handpiece. Perforations were made in the middle of the pulpal floor using size 4 round bur. The teeth were divided into two groups according to the material used to seal the perforation; Group I: ProRoot MTA and Group II: Totalfill®. The materials were left to set then the samples were sectioned longitudinally and the gap between the material and dentin was measured by SEM. Results: The results of this study showed that Group I (ProRoot MTA) showed more microleakage (17.47 ± 5.58 μm) compared to Group II (Totalfill®) that showed significantly less leakage (5.28 ± 2.18 μm). Conclusion: Based on the results of this study, it was concluded that Totalfill® showed better sealing ability and lesser microleakage than that of ProRoot MTA and therefore it can be a good alternative to MTA. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Totalfill®; furcal perforation; ProRoot MTA; Scanning electron microscope | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 35 PDF Download: 1 |
||
