An In Vitro Study to Evaluate the Accuracy of Different Impression Techniques of Implant Supported Prosthesis
El-Najjar, M., Abdel-Aziz, M., El-Kouedi, A., Hamza, T. (2639). An In Vitro Study to Evaluate the Accuracy of Different Impression Techniques of Implant Supported Prosthesis. EKB Journal Management System, 2018(10), -. doi: 10.21608/adjg.2018.109377
Mahmoud El-Najjar; Mohammed Abdel-Aziz; Ahmed El-Kouedi; Tamer Hamza. "An In Vitro Study to Evaluate the Accuracy of Different Impression Techniques of Implant Supported Prosthesis". EKB Journal Management System, 2018, 10, 2639, -. doi: 10.21608/adjg.2018.109377
El-Najjar, M., Abdel-Aziz, M., El-Kouedi, A., Hamza, T. (2639). 'An In Vitro Study to Evaluate the Accuracy of Different Impression Techniques of Implant Supported Prosthesis', EKB Journal Management System, 2018(10), pp. -. doi: 10.21608/adjg.2018.109377
El-Najjar, M., Abdel-Aziz, M., El-Kouedi, A., Hamza, T. An In Vitro Study to Evaluate the Accuracy of Different Impression Techniques of Implant Supported Prosthesis. EKB Journal Management System, 2639; 2018(10): -. doi: 10.21608/adjg.2018.109377

An In Vitro Study to Evaluate the Accuracy of Different Impression Techniques of Implant Supported Prosthesis

Al-Azhar Journal of Dentistry
Volume 2018, Issue 10, October 2018  XML
DOI: 10.21608/adjg.2018.109377
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Mahmoud El-Najjar1; Mohammed Abdel-Aziz2; Ahmed El-Kouedi2; Tamer Hamza3
1Assistant lecturer, Crown and Bridge department, Faculty of Dental Medicine for Boys, Al-Azhar University.
2Associate professor, Crown and Bridge department, Faculty of Dental Medicine for Boys, Al-Azhar University.
3Professor, Crown and Bridge department, Faculty of Dental Medicine for Boys, Al-Azhar University.
Abstract
Purpose: This study was designed to evaluate the dimensional accuracy of different impression techniques of implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis. Materials and Methods: Thirty impressions were made upon a specialized stainless-steel mold containing two parallel implant analogues. The impressions were divided into three groups according to implant impression technique used ten each; group (I) closed tray technique (C), group (II) open tray technique (O) and group (III) splinted open tray technique (OS). After taking impressions, they were poured with type IV dental stone and left for one day before analysis with a stereo microscope. Results: Regarding impression accuracy, there was no statistically significant difference between open tray and splinted open tray technique within the master mold while there was statistically significant difference between closed tray technique within the master mold. There was no statistically significant difference between open tray and splinted open tray technique while there was statistically significant difference between closed tray technique within the other two techniques. Conclusion: Closed tray technique showed more deviation in comparison to the master mold and the other two techniques that affect the final accuracy of multiple implant impression while no significant difference with the open tray technique of both types.
Keywords
Implant; impression technique; Impression material; open tray; Closed tray; Splinting
Statistics
Article View: 19