Antibacterial Efficacy of Diode laser 810nm on Enterococcus Faecalis on Primary Teeth, an invitro study | ||||
| Al-Azhar Journal of Dentistry | ||||
| Volume 2024, Issue 1, January 2024 | ||||
| DOI: 10.58675/2974-4164.1623 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
| Zienab A. Ghonem1; Mohamed H. Mustafa2; Shaymaa A. El Shishiny3 | ||||
| 1Master student at Al-Azhar University, Girls Branch | ||||
| 2Associate Professor and head of Pedodontics and Oral health, Faculty of Dental Medicine for Girls, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt | ||||
| 3Lecturer of Pedodontics and Oral health, Faculty of Dental Medicine, for Girls, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| Objectives: This study was done to compare the efficacy of diode laser vs chlorhexidine CHX as root canal disinfectant in primary teeth. samples and methods: Thirty extracted single rooted freshly extracted teeth divided into three groups as the following: Group I: contain 10 teeth in which they were irrigated with saline solution. Group II: contain 10 teeth in which they were irrigated with CHX 2%. Group III: contain 10 teeth in which they were irradiated with diode laser (810nm). The colony forming unit was counted by multiplication of amount of colonies/plate. Results: After irrigation: there was a statistically a significant difference in mean % of reduction of CFU of E. faecalis in the three groups (p<0.001*). CHX and Laser group showed higher % of reduction of CFU of E. faecalis than Saline group. Conclusion: Bacterial count decrease by both techniques showing no statistical differences against enterococcus faecalis between 810 diode laser and 2% chlorhexidine. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| primary teeth; Enterococcus faecalis; Diode laser | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 25 |
||||
