The Antibacterial Potentiality of Photo-activated Disinfection Versus a Chemical Disinfection Solution on Carious Dentin | ||||
| Al-Azhar Journal of Dentistry | ||||
| Volume 2017, Issue 7, July 2017 | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/adjg.2017.5259 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
| Rasha Samir1; Maha Niazy2; Hagar Bastawy3 | ||||
| 1A paper extracted from Master thesis entitled (The antibacterial Potentiality of Photo-activated Disinfection Versus Chemical Disinfection on Carious Dentin). | ||||
| 2Professor and Head of Operative Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dental Medicine for Girls. Al-Azhar University. | ||||
| 3Associate Professor of Endodontics, Endodontic Department, Faculty of Dental Medicine- for Girls. Al-Azhar University. | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| Aim: This study was conducted to assess the effect of different variables on antibacterial potential of photo-activated disinfection versus the effect of a chemical disinfection solution on carious dentin. Material and Methods: Seventy freshly extracted teeth were selected, All soft caries was removed by sterile excavator and specimens were weighted by five digit microbalance to be in range of 6-10 mg, Specimen divided into three groups: Group A1: disinfected with phot-activated disinfection (PAD) and divided into four subgroups(no=10 ) according to power& application time, Subgroup1(P1T1: delivery power was 100mW, application time was 120 sec) Subgroup2 (P1T2: delivery power was 50mW application time was 30 sec) Subgroup3 (P2T1: delivery power was 100mW application time was 120 sec) Subgroup4 (P2T2: delivery power was 50mW,application time was 30 sec).Group A2: disinfected with chemical disinfectant (chlorohexidine scrub 2%).Group A3: disinfected with laser beam only & divided into two subgroups P1T1,P2T2. The specimens were plated &duplicated on blood agar then incubated in anaerobic gas pack jar at 37C for 7 days. Results: A statistically significantdifference was found among PAD, chlorohexidine, and laser groups in the percent decrease in the total bacterial count (P≤ 0.05). The greatest mean percent decrease was recorded in the PAD P1T1 followed by the cholorohexidine group, then the laser P1T1. Conclusion: The combination of toluidine blue O (TBO) and diode laser could be effective in reducing the bacterial viability. Chlorohexidine as chemical disinfectant was equally effective to photo-activated disinfectant with high delivery power and long contact time in reducing the total bacterial count. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| PAD; Laser; Chlorohexidine; Photo-activated disinfection | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 17 |
||||
