A planning comparison using a body contour with head and neck mask and a body contour without head and neck mask in Head and neck cancer | ||
| Journal of Bioscience and Applied Research | ||
| Article 22, Volume 11, Issue 2, June 2025, Pages 646-6651 PDF (651.46 K) | ||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||
| DOI: 10.21608/jbaar.2025.354283.1143 | ||
| Authors | ||
| mohamed abour* 1; mohamed Bencheikh1; mohammed elghalmi2; Elmahjoub Chakir3 | ||
| 1LSIB, laboratory, Faculty of Sciences and Technologies Mohammedia, Hassan II University of Casablanca, Mohammedia,Morocco | ||
| 2Ibn Tofail University Faculty of Sciences, physics of materials and subatomic | ||
| 3LPMS Department, Faculty of Science, IBN Tofail University, Kenitra, Morocco | ||
| Abstract | ||
| In radiation for head and neck cancer, where patient positioning is crucial, accuracy in dose estimation is critical. Although thermoplastic masks are frequently used for immobilization, it is still up for debate whether or not these devices should be added to the body contour during planning. Two planning approaches are compared in this study: one that integrates the thermoplastic mask into the body contour and the other that does not. Using an identical beam dataset in the Eclipse planning system, 22 VMAT treatment plans were created. CT datasets were replicated for each case in order to provide comparable designs with and without the mask contour. In addition to standard tissue dose comparisons, dosimetric factors like D95%, D2%, and conformity index (CI) were evaluated for the PTV. The results show that target coverage and OAR sparing were marginally enhanced when the mask was removed from the body contour. These findings lend evidence to the possible benefit of removing immobilization devices from the body contour in order to improve treatment precision and planning effectiveness in clinical practice | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Radiotherapy; H& N; Dosimetry; VMAT; PTV | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 277 PDF Download: 119 |
||
