Assessment of Virtual Surgical Planning by Using 3D Modelling and Patient Specific Pre-Bent Plate for Mandibular Reconstruction: A Clinical Trial | ||
| The Egyptian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery | ||
| Article 7, Volume 49, Issue 3, July 2025, Pages 223-230 PDF (1.08 M) | ||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||
| DOI: 10.21608/ejprs.2025.444133 | ||
| Authors | ||
| Ahmed Sobhy Hweidi* ; Mariam M Abdel Hady* ; Mohamed Farag | ||
| The Department of Plastic, Burn and Maxillofacial Surgery, Ain Shams University | ||
| Abstract | ||
| Background: Vascularized bone flaps are now considered the benchmark for reconstructing the mandible. In recent years, virtual surgical planning has transformed the process of bone reconstruction. The procedure nowadays has far better outcomes in both functional and aesthetic aspects. Moreover, the operating times has significantly decreased with the continuous development of new advances. In addition, learning curve for surgeons has become less steep. Aim and Objectives: To compare mandibular reconstruction by free vascularized fibula using 3D models and Patient specific plate (pre bent by a manufacturer) with conventional free hand reconstruction method in our practice. Patients and Methods: This aim was achieved by comparing two groups of patients operated by the same surgeon. In group A virtual planning was used. On the other hand, a conventional free hand technique was used in group B. The 2 groups were compared regarding the operative time and the accuracy of reconstruction using radiological landmarks and measurements. Results: Our results showed a statistically significant reduction in operative time in Group A when compared to group < br />B. Moreover, there was a non-statistically significant improvement regarding accuracy of the reconstruction in group A. Conclusion: The Use of Virtual Surgical Planning & Patient Specific Plate (pre bent) for mandibular reconstruction can reduce the operative time and improve the accuracy of reconstruction. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Mandible reconstruction; Virtual surgical planning; 3D modelling | ||
| References | ||
|
Powcharoen W., Yang W.F., Yan Li K., Zhu W. and Su Y.X.: Computer-Assisted versus Conventional Freehand Mandibular Reconstruction with Fibula Free Flap: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Plast. Reconstr. Surg., Dec. 144 (6): 1417-1428, 2019. 2- Antony A.K., Chen W.F., Kolokythas A., Weimer K.A. and Cohen M.N.: Use of virtual surgery and stereolithography- guided osteotomy for mandibular reconstruction with the free fibula. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Nov. 1; 128 (5): 1080-4, 2011. 3- Thushara Kumari and Arvind Ramanathan: Digital technology in craniofacial surgery – Historical perspectives to current applications, 2022. 4- Barretto M.D.A., Melhem-Elias F. and Deboni M.C.Z.: The untold history of planning in orthognathic surgery: A narrative review from the beginning to virtual surgical simulation. J. Stomatol. Oral Maxillofac. Surg., Oct. 123 (5): e251-e259, 2022. doi: 10.1016/j.jormas.2022.04.002. Epub 2022 Apr 9. PMID: 35413462. 5- El-Mahallawy Y., Abdelrahman H.H. and Al-Mahalawy H.: Accuracy of virtual surgical planning in mandibular reconstruction: Application of a standard and reliable postoperative evaluation methodology. BMC Oral Health 23, 119, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-02811-8. 6- Reinald Kuehle, Medea Kuebler, Jennifer Fuchs, Frederic Weichel, Julius Moratin, Kolja Freier, Michael Engel, Jürgen Hoffmann, Oliver Ristow and Christian Freudlsperger: The value of prebent reconstruction plates and in-house 3D printing, Journal of Stomatology, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2023. 7- Levine J.P., Bae J.S., Soares M., Brecht L.E., Saadeh P.B., Ceradini D.J. and Hirsch D.L.: Jaw in a day: Total maxillofacial reconstruction using digital technology. Plast Reconstr. Surg., Jun. 131 (6): 1386-1391, 2013. 8- Ren W., Gao L., Li S., Chen C., Li F., Wang Q., Zhi Y., Song J., Dou Z., Xue L. and Zhi K.: Virtual Planning and 3D printing modeling for mandibular reconstruction with fibula free flap. Med. Oral Patol. Oral Cir. Bucal., May 1; 23 (3): e359-e366, 2018. doi: 10.4317/medoral.22295. 9- Annino D.J., Sethi R.K., Hansen E.E., Horne S., Dey T., Rettig E.M., Uppaluri R., Kass J.I. and Goguen L.A.: Virtual planning and 3D-printed guides for mandibular reconstruction: Factors impacting accuracy. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol., Oct. 21; 7 (6): 1798-1807, 2022. 10- Succo G., Berrone M., Battiston B., Tos P., Goia F., Appendino P. and Crosetti E.: Step-by-step surgical technique for mandibular reconstruction with fibular free flap: Application of digital technology in virtual surgical planning. Eur. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol., Jun. 272 (6): 1491-501, 2015. 11- Van Baar G.J.C., Forouzanfar T., Liberton N.P.T.J., Winters H.A.H. and Leusink F.K.J.: Accuracy of computer-assisted surgery in mandibular reconstruction: A systematic review. Oral Oncol., Sep. 84: 52-60, 2018. 12- Rodby K.A., Turin S., Jacobs R.J., Cruz J.F., Hassid V.J., Kolokythas A. and Antony A.K.: Advances in oncologic head and neck reconstruction: Systematic review and future considerations of virtual surgical planning and computer aided design/computer aided modeling. J. Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg., Sep. 67 (9): 1171-85, 2014. 13- Liu K., Zhang W., Wang Y., Xiang D.W., Shi H.B. and Liu Q.L.: Fibula osteal flap with proximal peroneal perforator skin paddle for composite oromandibular reconstruction: A case report. Medicine (Baltimore), Dec. 11; 99 (50): e23590, 2020. 14- Ni Y., Zhang X., Meng Z., Li Z., Li S., Xu Z.F., Sun C., Liu F. and Duan W.: Digital navigation and 3D model technology in mandibular reconstruction with fibular free flap: A comparative study. J. Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg., Sep. 122 (4): e59-e64, 2021. 15- Succo G., Berrone M., Battiston B., Tos P., Goia F., Appendino P. and Crosetti E.: Step-by-step surgical technique for mandibular reconstruction with fibular free flap: Application of digital technology in virtual surgical planning. Eur. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol., Jun. 272 (6): 1491-501, 2015. | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 55 PDF Download: 39 |
||
