Second - Stage Laparoscopic Traction Orchiopexy: Does Surgical Timing Make A Difference? | ||||
Minia Journal of Medical Research | ||||
Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript, Available Online from 27 July 2025 | ||||
Document Type: Original Article | ||||
DOI: 10.21608/mjmr.2025.404903.2037 | ||||
![]() | ||||
Authors | ||||
Mohamed Mahmoud Mamdouh Khedre1; Alaa A. Moustafa![]() ![]() | ||||
1Pediatric surgery, faculty of medicine, Minia university | ||||
2General Surgery, Faculty Of medicine, Minia University | ||||
3pediatric surgery unit minia university hospital , Minia, Egypt . | ||||
4Department of Pediatric Surgery, Faculty of medicine, Minia University | ||||
Abstract | ||||
Background: Laparoscopic traction orchiopexy is a standard approach for managing high intraabdominal testes. However, the ideal timing for the second-stage procedure remains debatable. Objective: To determine the optimal interval between stages of laparoscopic traction orchiopexy by comparing surgical difficulty, complication rates, and testicular outcomes. Methods: Twenty patients with intraabdominal testes were randomly allocated into two groups based on the interval before the second stage: 3 months (Group A) and 6 months (Group B). Intraoperative parameters, postoperative complications, and testicular outcomes were analyzed and compared. Results: Testicular viability was 100% in all groups, with no cases of atrophy. Operative time differed significantly across groups (p < 0.001), and the incidence of adhesions was highest in Group B (30%, p = 0.21). No significant differences were observed in postoperative testicular volume or position. Conclusion: Performing the second stage at 3 months post-traction offers the best balance between surgical ease and favorable outcomes. Delaying beyond this interval does not improve testicular health and may increase operative difficulty. | ||||
Keywords | ||||
aparoscopic traction orchiopexy; Intraabdominal testes; Surgical timing | ||||
Statistics Article View: 26 |
||||