Evaluating Egypt’s Urban Emergency Response System: Toward Resilient Cities and Integrated Crisis Governance with special reference to south sinai | ||||
| JES. Journal of Engineering Sciences | ||||
| Article 10, Volume 53, Issue 6, November and December 2025, Page 810-835 PDF (740.62 K) | ||||
| Document Type: Research Paper | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/jesaun.2025.402807.1607 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Author | ||||
ENAS SAMIR Hafiz  
| ||||
| Architecture department, higher inistitute of engineering, Cairo ,Egypt | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| This study evaluates Egypt’s Integrated Urban Emergency Response System (UERS), a national initiative developed through a strategic partnership between the Ministry of Local Development and the National Network for Emergency Services and Public Safety. Framed within Egypt Vision 2030 and the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction, the research addresses a central question: To what extent has the UERS improved operational effectiveness, institutional coordination, and equitable access to emergency services in Egyptian cities? The study aims to evaluate the system's effectiveness in reducing emergency response times and assesses the role of advanced technologies, like artificial intelligence (AI), geographic information systems (GIS), and 5 Generation (5G) infrastructure, in enhancing real-time decision-making and crisis detection. It further examines the degree of institutional integration among emergency service providers, analyzes the fair access to emergency services across diverse urban populations, and explores the system’s overall contribution to strengthening urban resilience. A mixed-methods research design is adopted, combining qualitative policy and case analysis, key informant interviews, geospatial mapping, and quantitative assessment of pre- and post-implementation performance indicators. Data are collected from national policy frameworks, technical reports, GIS maps, and field observations in South Sinai Governorate. The study tests a series of hypotheses to evaluate the performance and impact of UERS. It posits that the system has significantly enhanced coordination among agencies and reduced emergency response times, while also identifying critical challenges such as shortages in trained human resources and initial resistance from decision-makers that have constrained full implementation. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| Smart urban governance; Digital transformation of public services; Urban resilience frameworks; NAS | ||||
| References | ||||
|
[1] Elkadiri, M., & ElGohary, H, “Challenges and opportunities for integrated emergency response systems in developing countries: The case of Egypt, 2022. [2]Ministry of Local Development, Cairo, Egypt, Annual Report on Public Safety and Emergency Services Integration, 2023. [3] United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNDRR), Digital Transformation in Emergency Management: Case Study Egypt’s Integrated Response System, 2024. [4] Central Agency for Public Mobilization and Statistics (CAPMAS), https://www.capmas.gov.eg/Pages/populationClock.aspx, last access 10 june 2025. [5] video [6] El Sayed A, Abdelaziz M and Abdel AzeemM, Blockchain for Decentralized Emergency Management System, International Journal of Computing and Digital Systems, 2023. [7] UN Sustainable Development Report, 2023. [8]El Hassan, H. & Abdelrahman, O, Journal of Urban Disaster Resilience, 14(2), 83–101, 2023 [9] Source: By the Author [10] Schweizer, D. & Ostrom, E, from resilience thinking to resilience planning: A framework for actionable integration. Cities, 128, 103709, 2022. [11] Shi, P., Leon, M. & Kabisch, S, Integrating the City Resilience Framework into urban planning: a case study review. Sustainable Cities and Society, 66, 102704, 2021. [12] Butler L, Gillick S, Morrissey E & Mulderrig L, Copenhagen's green-spaces, climate adaptation Story Map, https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/6f47c3d57bdb46d786d2673f1ed3ef36, 2022, last accessed May 2025. [13] Copenhagen climate adaptation plan Carbon Neutral by 2025, Climate Capital Copenhagen, https://www.kk.dk/politik/politikker-og-indsatser/klima-miljoe-og-natur/klimaplan-co2-neutral-hovedstad, 2011, last accessed May 2025. [14] Farouk, A, Director of the National Emergency and Public Safety Network -Network as services (NAS) around the 27 governorates, (E. Samir, Interviewer) Cairo, Egypt, 2024. [15] Bradley-Smith, Karen, Tippett, Vivienne, & FitzGerald, Gerard, Improving the response to disasters by enhancing the incident command system. Australian Journal of Emergency Management, 39(1), pp. 8-12, 2024. [16] Faming Jiang, Investigation on the Construction of Urban Intelligent Emergency Management System Based on Data Mining Technolog, Volume 2022, Issue 1, 2022. [17] Edgington, D. W, Planning for Earthquakes and Tsunamis: Lessons from Japan for British Columbia, Canada. Progress in Planning, 163, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2021.100626, 2022, last accessed June 2025. [18] The Government of Jaban, Next-Gen Disaster Tech: AI Transforms Social Media and Big Data into Life-Saving Insights, https://www.japan.go.jp/kizuna/2025/03/next-gen_disaster_tech.html?utm_source=chatgpt.com, 2025, last accessed June 2025. [19] Almulhim, A. I, Building Urban Resilience Through Smart City Planning: A Systematic Literature Review. Smart Cities, 8(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities8010022, 2025, last accessed June 2025. [20] Information and Data centre of South Sinai Report, Tor Sinai, South Sinai, Egypt, 2024. [21] Elgendy, N., & Aly, D, Smart Governance in Egypt’s Urban Transformation: A Pathway to Inclusive Cities, International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development, https://doi.org/10.1080/19463138.2023.2174929, 2023, Last accessed January 2024. [22] United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNDRR), Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030. United Nations. https://www.undrr.org/publication/sendai-framework-disaster-risk-reduction-2015-2030, 2015, last accessed in March 2025. | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 581 PDF Download: 204 |
||||
