Short Term Outcomes of Intravascular Ultrasound Guided Management of Patients with In-stent Restenosis in Comparison with Angiography Guided Management
Aref, M., Abd EL Hamid, A., Alkhouly, A., Mahmoud, H. (2025). Short Term Outcomes of Intravascular Ultrasound Guided Management of Patients with In-stent Restenosis in Comparison with Angiography Guided Management. EKB Journal Management System, 2025(2), 165-170. doi: 10.21608/aimj.2025.446434
Mansour Mohamed Mustafa Aref; Abd EL Hamid Ismail Abd EL Hamid; Abdelaal Alsayed Abdelrahman Alkhouly; Hazem Awad Mahmoud. "Short Term Outcomes of Intravascular Ultrasound Guided Management of Patients with In-stent Restenosis in Comparison with Angiography Guided Management". EKB Journal Management System, 2025, 2, 2025, 165-170. doi: 10.21608/aimj.2025.446434
Aref, M., Abd EL Hamid, A., Alkhouly, A., Mahmoud, H. (2025). 'Short Term Outcomes of Intravascular Ultrasound Guided Management of Patients with In-stent Restenosis in Comparison with Angiography Guided Management', EKB Journal Management System, 2025(2), pp. 165-170. doi: 10.21608/aimj.2025.446434
Aref, M., Abd EL Hamid, A., Alkhouly, A., Mahmoud, H. Short Term Outcomes of Intravascular Ultrasound Guided Management of Patients with In-stent Restenosis in Comparison with Angiography Guided Management. EKB Journal Management System, 2025; 2025(2): 165-170. doi: 10.21608/aimj.2025.446434

Short Term Outcomes of Intravascular Ultrasound Guided Management of Patients with In-stent Restenosis in Comparison with Angiography Guided Management

Al-Azhar International Medical Journal
Volume 2025, Issue 2, February 2025, Page 165-170  XML PDF (475.49 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/aimj.2025.446434
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Mansour Mohamed Mustafa Aref1; Abd EL Hamid Ismail Abd EL Hamid1; Abdelaal Alsayed Abdelrahman Alkhouly2; Hazem Awad Mahmoud* 1
1Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine for Boys, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt
2Cardiology, Islamic Cardiac Center, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt
Abstract
Background: Diameter stenosis of more than 50% within the stent or at its margins (five-millimeter segments next to the stent) on coronary angiography is commonly and arbitrarily used to define in-stent restenosis (ISR).   
Aim and objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the short-term outcomes of IVUS-guided management of patients with In-Stent restenosis with angiography-guided management.
Patients and methods: Following authorization from our institution's ethical board, 60 patients undergoing revascularization at Al-Azhar University Hospital for ISR participated in this observational cohort study comparing outcomes from February 2023 to November 2024.
Results: Compared to the angiography group, the IVUS group required much more time for the procedure and fluoroscopy. When comparing the IVUS and angiography groups, the contrast volume was noticeably lower in the former. While 3 patients (10%) in the angiography group and 1 patient (3.33%) in the IVUS group experienced restenosis, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups.
Conclusion: IVUS-guided interventions were associated with significantly reduced contrast volume and lower post-NC balloon dilatation requirements; however, they had longer procedure and fluoroscopy times compared to the angiography intervention. Both methods showed improvements in left ventricular ejection fraction over six months, indicating beneficial outcomes with both approaches.
Keywords
In-stent restenosis; Angiography; Intravascular ultrasound
Statistics
Article View: 11
PDF Download: 5