Comparative Evaluation Of Osseodensification Vs. Traditional Technique For Dental Implants Placement In Posterior Maxilla Using Resonance Frequency Analysis And Bone Density Measurement
bahgat, A., Hegab, A., El Naas, S. (2025). Comparative Evaluation Of Osseodensification Vs. Traditional Technique For Dental Implants Placement In Posterior Maxilla Using Resonance Frequency Analysis And Bone Density Measurement. EKB Journal Management System, 28(3), 431-438. doi: 10.21608/ajdsm.2024.260356.1498
ahmed samir bahgat; Ayman Hegab; samy saeed El Naas. "Comparative Evaluation Of Osseodensification Vs. Traditional Technique For Dental Implants Placement In Posterior Maxilla Using Resonance Frequency Analysis And Bone Density Measurement". EKB Journal Management System, 28, 3, 2025, 431-438. doi: 10.21608/ajdsm.2024.260356.1498
bahgat, A., Hegab, A., El Naas, S. (2025). 'Comparative Evaluation Of Osseodensification Vs. Traditional Technique For Dental Implants Placement In Posterior Maxilla Using Resonance Frequency Analysis And Bone Density Measurement', EKB Journal Management System, 28(3), pp. 431-438. doi: 10.21608/ajdsm.2024.260356.1498
bahgat, A., Hegab, A., El Naas, S. Comparative Evaluation Of Osseodensification Vs. Traditional Technique For Dental Implants Placement In Posterior Maxilla Using Resonance Frequency Analysis And Bone Density Measurement. EKB Journal Management System, 2025; 28(3): 431-438. doi: 10.21608/ajdsm.2024.260356.1498

Comparative Evaluation Of Osseodensification Vs. Traditional Technique For Dental Implants Placement In Posterior Maxilla Using Resonance Frequency Analysis And Bone Density Measurement

Al-Azhar Journal of Dental Science
Volume 28, Issue 3, July 2025, Page 431-438  XML PDF (633.01 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/ajdsm.2024.260356.1498
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
ahmed samir bahgat email 1; Ayman Hegab2; samy saeed El Naas3
1oral surgery
2Al Azhar university
3Lecturer, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Boys
Abstract
Objectives: posterior maxillary region exhibits low bone density that affects implant
stability placed using conventional drilling protocol. The present study aimed to assess implant
stability and bone density of densah bur osseodensification drilling in maxillary posterior region..
Patients and Methods: sixteen implants were inserted for 8 patients aged between 32 and 45
years old with posterior maxillary single or multiple missing teeth. Implants were randomly
divided into two equal groups: group (I) (n=8): implant bed was prepared using densah burs,
and group (II) (n=8): implant bed was prepared using conventional drills. The patients were
evaluated clinically and radiographically preoperatively, immediately post-implantation and 6
months postoperatively. Clinical evaluation using Resonance frequency analysis (RFA) for
implant stability. Radiographic evaluation was achieved by CBCT to measure bone density.
Results: for implant stability, there was a statistically significant difference between both groups
in primary and secondary stability. For bone density, there was a statistically significant
difference between both groups in all intervals. Conclusions: using osseodensification protocol
by densah burs improves osteotomy preparation in maxillary alveolar bone with low density,
Densah burs show higher primary implant stability values and improves bone density around
dental implants.
Keywords
osseodensification; densah durs; implant stability; RFA
Statistics
Article View: 10
PDF Download: 13