A Minimalist Analysis of Tense Carriers in the Syntax of Standard Arabic | ||
| Miṣriqiyā | ||
| Article 4, Volume 5, Issue 2, October 2025, Pages 32-70 PDF (760.5 K) | ||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||
| DOI: 10.21608/misj.2025.399375.1069 | ||
| Authors | ||
| Sarah Alaa Mohammed* 1; Wafaa Abdel-Faheem Batran2; Rania Galal Hamed3 | ||
| 1English Department, Faculty of ,Women, Ain Shams University, Egypt | ||
| 2English Department, Faculty of women, Ain Shams University, Egypt | ||
| 3English Department, Faculty of Women, Ain Shams University, Egypt | ||
| Abstract | ||
| This paper investigates the syntax and semantics of tense in Standard Arabic (SA) within the framework of Chomsky’s Minimalist Program (1995). Unlike English, where tense is realized through auxiliaries, modals, or affix lowering, SA encodes tense across various functional categories, including complementizers, negators, and linking verbs. This study examines the syntactic roles of the complementizers ʔinna “indeed” and ʔanna “that”, in contrast with the infinitival ʔann “to”, and their interaction with clause structure. It also investigates Ibn Hisham’s traditional classification of linking verbs kāna “was” and its sisters, which he categorizes into (i) unmarked linking verbs, (ii) marked linking verbs that require a c-commanding licenser, and (iii) the conditional linking verb ma-dāma “as long as”. Special attention is given to laysa “is not”, which functions as a negative copular verb with inherent tense and agreement properties. This paper further explores the complementary distribution of kāna and the complementizer ʔinna, as well as the syntactic behavior of five key negators in SA: lā, lam, lan, lā functioning like laysa, and the generic lā (al-nāfiya li-l-jins). Their effects on tense interpretation and clause structure are analyzed in depth. Based on syntactic modules, such as Case Theory, Movement, Feature Valuation, and C-command, this study contributes to the understanding of how tense is encoded in Arabic, offering cross-linguistic insights into the architecture of functional categories in Arabic and English syntax. The findings demonstrate that tense in SA is realized through C, T, and Neg, each contributing to Case, Agreement, and Mood under locality constraints. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Tense; Licensers; Case; Movement; Negation | ||
| Full Text | ||
|
Sara Alaa serves as a Teaching Assistant of Linguistics at the Faculty of Women, Ain Shams University. She is currently pursuing her MA in Linguistics under the supervision of Prof. Wafaa Adel-Faheem Batran. Her research focuses on Tense and Functional Categories in Standard Arabic: A Minimalist Approach. Sara has assisted in teaching various linguistics and English language courses and contributed to academic events organized by the Academic Research Circle (ARC). She has participated in local and international conferences and received training in scientific writing, international publishing, and AI literacy in education. She has also taken part in workshops exploring the intersection of artificial intelligence and translation, including “The AI-Powered Translator: Working Together”, which focused on how AI can support and enhance human translation processes. | ||
| References | ||
|
Al-Balushi, R. (2011). Case in Standard Arabic: The Untrigued Nominal (Doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto).
Al-Horais, N. (2017). On negation and focus in Standard Arabic: An interface-based approach. Journal of Universal Language, 18(1), 1–34.
Aoun, J., Benmamoun, E., & Choueiri, L. (2010). The syntax of Arabic. Cambridge University Press.
Benmamoun, E. (1989). Negation and the Functional Structure of Arabic. In Proceedings of WCCFL 8 (pp. 21–32). Stanford Linguistics Association.
Benmamoun, E. (2000). The feature structure of functional categories: A comparative study of Arabic dialects. Oxford University Press.
Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. Mouton.
Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
Chomsky, N. (1993). A minimalist program for linguistic theory. In K. Hale & S. J. Keyser (Eds.), The View from Building 20 (pp. 1–52). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, N. (1995). The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, N. (2000). Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In R. Martin, D. Michaels, & J. Uriagereka (Eds.), Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik (pp. 89–155). MIT Press.
Chomsky, N. (2000). New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chomsky, N. (2001). Derivation by phase. In M. Kenstowicz (Ed.), Ken Hale: A Life in Language (pp. 1–52). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Comrie, B., Haspelmath, M., & Bickel, B. (2015). The Leipzig glossing rules: Conventions for interlinear morpheme-by-morpheme glosses. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Retrieved from https://www.eva.mpg.de/lingua/resources/glossing-rules.php
Emonds, J. E. (1970). Root and structure-preserving transformations (Doctoral dissertation, MIT).
Fassi Fehri, A. (1993). Issues in the structure of Arabic clauses and words. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Hasan, A. (1975). Al-Nahw al-wafi (3rd ed., Vol. 1). Dar al-Ma'arif.
Ibn Hisham, ʿA. b. Y. (n.d.). Awḍaḥ al-Masālik ilā Alfiyyat Ibn Mālik (M. M. ʿAbd al-Ḥamīd, Ed., Vol. 1). Ṣaydā: Manshūrāt al-Maktabah al-ʿAṣriyyah.
Jackendoff, R. (1977). X’ Syntax: A Study of Phrase Structure. Cambridge, MIT Press.
Klima, E. S. (1964). Negation in English. In J. A. Fodor & J. J. Katz (Eds.), The structure of language: Readings in the philosophy of language (pp. 246–323). Prentice-Hall.
Ladefoged, P. & Maddieson, I. (1996). The sounds of the world’s languages. Blackwell Publishers: Oxford.
Ladusaw, W. A. (1979). Polarity sensitivity as inherent scope relations (Doctoral dissertation). University of Texas at Austin.
Ouhalla, J. (1991). Functional categories and parametric variation. Routledge.
Ouhalla, J. (1993). Negation, focus and tense: The Arabic maa and laa. Rivista di Linguistica, 5(1), 275–300.
Pollock, J.-Y. (1989). Verb movement, Universal Grammar, and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry, 20(3), 365–424.
Rizzi, L. (1997). The fine structure of the left periphery. In L. Haegeman (Ed.), Elements of Grammar (pp. 281–337). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Ryding, K. C. (2005). A reference grammar of Modern Standard Arabic. Cambridge University Press.
Shariq, M. (2015). Arabic and English Consonants: A Phonetic and Phonological Investigation. Advances in Language and literary Studies, 6(6), 146-152
Soltan, U. (2007). On formal feature licensing in minimalism: Aspects of standard Arabic morphosyntax (Doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park).
Wright, W., Smith, W. R., & de Goeje, M. J. (1898). A grammar of the Arabic language: Translated from the German of Caspari and edited with numerous additions and corrections (Vols. 1–2). Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from https://archive.org/details/AGrammarOfTheArabicLanguageV1/Gram_Wright2/page/n9/mode/2up?view=theater | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 37 PDF Download: 9 |
||
