possibility of establishing an Ombudsman in Egypt A Comparative Study . | ||
| مجلة البØوث القانونية والإقتصادية (المنصورة) | ||
| Volume 15, Issue 92., June 2025, Pages 1-50 PDF (881.7 K) | ||
| Document Type: المقالة الأصلية | ||
| DOI: 10.21608/mjle.2025.454084 | ||
| Author | ||
| نسرين Øسين Ø£Øمد طه* | ||
| كلية الØقوق - جامعة المنصورة | ||
| Abstract | ||
| This article will explore the implementation of the Ombudsman system in Egypt and examine whether such a system is necessary. Egypt already has numerous supervisory, judicial, and regulatory bodies committed to combating corruption, promoting transparency, and ensuring integrity within governmental operations. In this context, Egypt established the Unified Governmental Complaints System in 2017 to address citizens’ grievances and reduce administrative corruption. While this system has achieved some progress, it still requires significant reforms to enhance its effectiveness and ensure it fully achieves its objectives. Therefore, this research aims to develop the Unified Governmental Complaints System by introducing new mechanisms inspired by the approaches of Ombudsman institutions. In this regard, the study will explore the Ombudsman system by presenting two distinct models. On one hand, the first model is the parliamentary Ombudsman, exemplified by the Scandinavian systems, such as Sweden, which is regarded as a pioneer in this field, and Denmark, which further developed the Swedish model and played a significant role in its widespread adoption. On the other hand, the second model is the governmental Ombudsman, represented by the Latin systems. A notable example of this model is the "Mediator" in France. In 2011, French law was amended to grant the Mediator additional responsibilities and powers, resulting in its renaming to the "Defender of Rights." | ||
| Keywords | ||
| An Ombudsman | ||
| References | ||
|
| ||
|
Statistics Article View: 4 PDF Download: 1 |
||
