Evaluation of Electronic Correction System for Objective Tests at Mansoura University: Academic Faculty Members’ Perspective | ||
| Artificial Intelligence Information Security | ||
| Volume 3, Issue 10, November 2025, Pages 1-57 PDF (2.39 M) | ||
| Document Type: Refereed research papers. | ||
| DOI: 10.21608/aiis.2025.422929.1024 | ||
| Author | ||
| Wessam Mohammed Kamal* | ||
| كلية التربية النوعية-جامعة المنصورة | ||
| Abstract | ||
| Background: Mansoura University is one of the first Egyptian universities to adopt electronic exam correction, as it launched a new electronic system for managing objective exams, "multiple choice," but it faces many challenges. Evaluating faculty members' satisfaction with the procedures implemented in the electronic correction exam system at Mansoura University is an accurate and effective solution for measuring the system's efficiency. Objectives: Knowing the degree of satisfaction of faculty members with the reality of the procedures for implementing the electronic correction system for objective tests at Mansoura University. Methods: This research uses a faculty member satisfaction scale to measure four main dimensions.The first aspect is the readiness of the electronic correction exam system environment. The second aspect is the quality of the electronic correction exam system user interface. The third aspect is the ability of the electronic correction exam system to correct objective tests. The fourth aspect is the accuracy of the electronic correction exam system and the methods of displaying results. Results: The results showed that faculty members' satisfaction with the implementation procedures of the electronic correction system at Mansoura University was high for the dimensions of results display and user interface quality, while it was moderate for the dimensions of readiness of the electronic correction environment and accuracy of the electronic correction ability. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Quality of Educational System; E-Correction System; Objective Tests; Academic Faculty Members; Student Evaluation Fairness | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 7 PDF Download: 10 |
||
