Effect of Triclosan Toothpaste on Gingivitis and Plaque Accumulation in Children Wearing Fixed Orthodontic Appliances: A Randomized Clinical Trial | ||||
| Alexandria Dental Journal | ||||
| Article 15, Volume 40, Issue 1, July 2015, Page 94-100 PDF (365.76 K) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/adjalexu.2015.58742 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
| M Bayoumi1; A Hanno2; A Sharaf2 | ||||
| 1Instructor, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Pharos University in Alexandria | ||||
| 2Professor, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| Introduction: The greatest preventive challenge in dentistry is the control of dental biofilm and consequently avoiding dental caries and gingival inflammation. As an adjunct to the mechanical oral hygiene measures, chemical antimicrobial agents seem to offer great benefits in the control of plaque formation and gingivitis, especially in high risk patients wearing orthodontic appliances. Objective: The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of Triclosan (0.3%) Colgate Total® on gingivitis and plaque formation in patients wearing fixed orthodontic appliances. Materials and methods: Fifty children wearing fixed orthodontic appliances with an age range of 9 to 13 years were randomly assigned into 2 groups (test and control). The test group received the Colgate Total® toothpaste containing 0.32% sodium fluoride and 0.3% Triclosan. The control group received maxfresh® toothpaste containing 0.22% sodium fluoride. All patients were examined clinically to assess their gingival condition using the Plaque index (PI), Gingival Index (GI), Sulcular Bleeding Index (SBI) at follow up periods of 1, 2 and 3 months. Each group shifted to use the alternative agent after a washout period of 10 days to prevent the carryover effect of Triclosan. Results: Showed that the Triclosan toothpaste users experienced significant reduction in plaque accumulation and gingivitis compared to the fluoride toothpaste users in the first and second follow up periods. The results also showed significant difference compared to the baseline. Conclusion: Triclosan toothpaste proved to have marked antiplaque and antigingivitis effects. Triclosan toothpaste proved to counteract the aggravated gingival effects that can be introduced by the fixed orthodontic appliances in children at the age of puberty | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| Triclosan; Toothpaste; plaque; gingivitis; children; orthodontic appliances | ||||
| References | ||||
|
1. Moynihan P, Petersen P. Diet, Nutrition and the prevention of dental diseases. Public Health Nutr. 2004; 7(1A): 201–26.
2. Ellis P, Benson P. Potential hazards of orthodontic treatment- what your patient sould know. Dent Update. 2002; 29: 492-6.
3. Sadowsky C, BeGole E. Long term effects of orthodontic treatment on periodontal health. Am J Orthod. 1981; 80: 156-72.
4. Polson A, Subtelny J, Mertner S. Long term periodontal status after orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1988; 93: 51-8.
5. Zachrisson B. Cause and prevention of injuries to teeth and supporting structures during orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod. 1976; 69: 285-300.
6. Rebelo M, DeQueiroz A. Gingival Indices: State of Art. In: Gingival Diseases – Their Aetiology, Prevention and Treatment. InTech, 2011. 42-54.
7. Eliades T, Eliades G, Brantley W. Microbial attachment on orthodontic appliances. Wettability and early pellicle formation on bracket materials. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995; 108: 351-60.
8. Lee S, Lee S, Jim B, Ahn S. Surface characteristics of orthodontic materials and their effect on adhesion of Mutans Streptococci. Angel Orthod. 2009; 79: 353-60.
9. Ericsson I, Thilande B, Lindhe J. Periodontal conditions after orthodontic movements in dog. Angle Orthodont. 1978; 48: 210-18.
10. Jeffcoat M. Pits and pitfalls of clinical trial designs. J Periodontol 2000. 1992; 63: 1045-51.
11. McDonald R, Avery D, Dean J. Dentistry for child and adolescent. 9th ed.: Mosby; 2011.
12. O'Mullane D. New agents in the control of plaque and gingivitis reaction paper. J Dent Res. 1992; 71: 1455-6.
13. Saravia M, Nelson-Filho P, Silva R, De Rossi A, Faria G, Silva L. Recovery of Mutans Streptococci on MSB, SB-20 and SB-20M agar media. Arch Oral Biol. 2013; 58: 311-6.
14. Davies R. Toothpaste in the control of plaque/gingivitis and periodontitis. periodontol 2000. 2008; 48: 23-30.
15. Davies R, Scully C, Preston A. Dentifrices-an update. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2010; 15: 976-82.
16. European Commission. Directorate General for Health & Consumers. Opinion on triclosan, addendum to the SCCP Opinion on Triclosan (SCCP/1192/08). 2009 January. Brussels: European Commission.
17. Ciancio S, Panagakos F. Superior Management of Plaque and Gingivitis Through the Use of a Triclosan/Copolymer Dentifrice. J Clin Dent. 2010; 21: 93–5.
18. Boneta A, Aguilar M, Romeu F, Stewart B, DeVizio W, Proskin H. Comparative investigation of the efficacy of Triclosan/Copolymer/Sodium Fluoride and Stannous Fluoride/Sodium Hexametaphosphate/Zinc Lactate dentifrices for the control of the established supragingival plaque and gingivitis in a six month clinical study. J Clin Dent 2010; 21: 117-23.
19. Willershausen B, Kasaj A, Sculean A, Wehrbein H. Influence of herbal mouthwash on inflammatory changes of the gingiva in patients with fixed orthodontic appliances. Perio. 2004; 1(3): 255-62.
20. Calafat A, Xiaoyun Y, Wong L, Reidy J, Needham L. Urinary concentrations of Triclosan in the U.S population : 2003-2004. Environ Health Prospect. 2008; 116(3): 303-7.
21. Darby M, Walsh M. Dental Hygiene Theory and Practice. St. Louis, Mo.: Saunders/Elsevier, 2010. 1-4.
22. Newman M, Takei H, Carranza F. Carranza's Clinical Periodontology. In: WB Saunders. Philadelphia; 2006. 141-7.
23. ADA: American Dental Association - Cleaning Your Teeth & Gums." ADA: American Dental Association - Home. N.p., n.d. Web. 5 Aug. 2015.
24. Davies R, Ellwood R, Davies G. The effectiveness of a toothpaste containing triclosan and polyvinylmethyl ether/maleic acid copolymer in improving plaque control and gingival health. A systematic review. J Clin Periodontol. 2004; 31: 1029-33.
25. Gunsolley J. A meta-analysis of six-month studies of antiplaque and antigingivitis agents. J Am Dent Assoc. 2006; 137: 1649-57.
26. Blinkhhorn A, Bartold P, Cullinan M, Madden T, Marshall R, Raphael S, et al. Is there a role for Triclosaan/Copolymer toothpaste in management of periodontal disease. Br Dent J. 2009; 207: 117-25.
27. DeVizio W. The efficacy of a new dentifrice with caries, plaque, gingivitis, calculus, tooth whitening, and malodor benefits. J Clin Dent. 2008; 19: 79-80
28. Singh S, Chakins P, De vizio W, Petrone M, Panagakos F, Proskin H. A clinical investigation of the efficacy of 3 commercially available dentifrices for controlling established gingivitis and supragingival plaque. J Clin Dent. 2010; 21: 105-10.
29. He T, Barke L, Biesbrock A, Miner M, Amini P, Goyal R, et al. Evaluation of anti-gingivitis benefits of Stannous Fluoride dentifrice among Triclosan dentifrice users. Am J Dent 2013; 26: 175-9.
30. Kthari B, Bhad W. Antimicrobial efficacy of Chlorhexidine and Triclosan on the Orthodontic appliance components: An in-vivo comparative microbial cultur study. ADR. 2011; 1(1): 1-11. | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 231 PDF Download: 462 |
||||
