THE USE OF N-BUTYL CYANOACRYLATE ADHESIVE IN THE CLOSURE OF MUCOPERIOSTEAL FLAP AFTER THE SURGICAL EXTRACTION OF IMPACTED MANDIBULAR THIRD MOLAR | ||||
| Alexandria Dental Journal | ||||
| Article 4, Volume 40, Issue 2, December 2015, Page 152-159 PDF (1007.34 K) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/adjalexu.2015.59139 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
| M Rewainy* ; S Osman* ; N El-prince* | ||||
| Bachelor in dentistry, BDS, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Alexandria. | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| Introduction: Surgical extraction of impacted third molars has become a routine procedure in most of dental clinics. Tissue adhesives based on Nbutyl cyanoacrylate are employed as a non-suture method for intra-oral postsurgical wound closure. Objectives: Evaluation of the clinical post-operative complications after the use of N-butyl cyanoacrylate soft tissue adhesive in closure of mucoperiosteal flaps after the surgical extraction of impacted mandibular third molars compared to the use of conventional silk sutures. Materials and methods: This study was conducted on twenty patients of both sexes ranging from 20 to 30 years of age.Patients were divided equally into two groups (Study and control groups) each with mesioangular impacted mandibular third molar (class II position B according to Pell and Gregory’s classification). After the surgical extraction of impacted teeth the flaps were closed using PeriAcryl 90 (Glustitch corporation, Delta, BC, Canada) soft tissue adhesive in the study group and using 3/0 silk sutures in the control group. Patients were evaluated for pain, bleeding, trismus, facial swelling, wound dehiscence and local reaction. Results: There was a statistically significant reduction of pain, bleeding, trismus, wound reaction on using the N-butyl cyanoacrylate (PeriAcryl 90) compared to sutures , concerning wound dehiscence and facial swelling , the results of both materials were nearly the same. Conclusion: The use of the N-butyl cyanoacrylate (PeriAcryl 90) for the closure of mucoperiosteal flaps is a reliable method that can overcome most of complications faced on using conventional silk sutures in addition to ease of manipulation , time saving and safety factors. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| Impacted third molar; mucoperiosteal flap; cyanoacrylate adhesive; PeriAcryl 90 | ||||
| References | ||||
|
1. Kruger GO. Textbook of Oral and Maxillofacial surgery, 6th (ed) ;St. Louis: Mosby. 1984. 1-3.
2. Kwon PH, Laskin DM. Clinicians’ manual of Oral and Maxillofacial surgery.3rd (ed). Quintessence Publishing Co. Incorporation. Chicago 2001. 241-50.
3. Killey HC, Kay LW, Seward GR, Harris M, McGowan AD. Killey and Kay’s Outline of Oral Surgery. Part 1, 2nd (ed). Wright Bristol; 1987:28-42.
4. Ghoreishian M, Gheisari R, Fayazi M. Tissue adhesive and suturing for closure of the surgical wound after removal of impacted mandibular third molars: a comparative study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009;108:e14-6.
5. Giray CB, Atasever A, Durgun B, Araz K. Clinical electron microscope comparison of silk sutures and Nbutyl-2-cyanoacrylate in human mucosa. Aust Dent J 1997;42: 225-8.
6. Buckley MJ, Beckman EJ. Adhesive use in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2010;22:195-9.
7. Gogulanathan M, Elavenil P, Gnanam A, Raja VB. Evaluation of fibrin sealant as a wound closure agent in mandibular third molar surgery-a prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2015; 44: 871-5.
8. Bimal J, Trivedi A, Bhavsar N. Use of fibrin glue in periodontal flap surgery. J Indian Soc Periodontol 2008;12:21-5.
9. Adler N, Nachumovsky S, Meshulam-Derazon S, Ad-El D. Skin graft fixation with cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive in burn patients. BURNS 2007;33:803.
10. Kulkarni S. Healing of periodontal flaps when closed with silk sutures and N-butyl cyanoacrylate: a clinical and histological study. Ind J Den Res 2007;18:72-7.
11. Singer AJ, Quinn JV, Hollander JE. The cyanoacrylate topical skin adhesives. Am J Emerg Med 2008;26:490-6.
12. Daniel P, Zins JE, Banbury J, Djohan R, Yetman RJ, Papay F. A comparison of dermabond tissue adhesive and sutures in the primary repair of the congenital cleft lip. Ann Plast Surg 2007;58:121-5.
13. Toriumi M, Raslan F, Friedman M, Eugene M, Tardy J. Variable histotoxicity of histoacryl when used in a subcutaneous site: an experimental study.Laryngoscope. 1991; 101: 339-43.
14. Kaplan M, Bozkurt S, Kut MS, Kullu S, Demirtas MM. Histopathological effects of ethyl 2-cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive following surgical application: an experimental study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2004;25:167-72.
15. Mourougayan V. Sutureless skin closure for cleft lip repair. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2006;43:656-8.
16. Perin LF, Helene A, Fraga MF. Sutureless closure of the upper eyelids in blepharoplasty: use of octyl-2- cyanoacrylate. Aesthet Surg J 2009;29:87-92.
17. Elgazzar RF, Abdulmajeed I, Mutabbakani M. Cyanoacrylate glue versus suture in peripheral nerve reanastomosis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007;104:465-72.
18. Arunachalam P, King PA, Orford J. A prospective comparison of tissue glue versus sutures for circumcision. Int J Pediatr Surg 2003;19:18-9.
19. Cohen K, Diegelman RF, Lindblat WJ. Wound Healing: Biochemical and Clinical Aspects. WBSaunders Co. 1992.
20. Khalil HS, Elshall MA, Harbi YA, Asmar SA, Wadee MA. Healing of oral surgical wounds using 3/0 silk suture and n-butyl cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive. Egypt Dent J 2009;55:2607.
21. Pell G, Gregory B. Impacted mandibular third molars: classification and modified techniques for removal. Dent Diag 1993;39:330-8.
22. Gabka J, Matsumara T. Measuring techniques and clinical testing of an anti- inflammatory agent (tantum). Munch Med Wochenschr 1971;113:198-203.
23. Al-Belasy FA, Amer MZ. Hemostatic effect of n-butyl2-cyanoacrylate (histoacryl) glue in warfarin-treated patients undergoing oral surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003;61:1405-9.
24. Pérez M, Fernández I, Márquez D, Bretaña RM. Use of N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate in oral surgery: biological and clinical evaluation. Artificial Organs2000;24:241-3.
25. Joshi AD, Saluja H, Mahindra U, Halli R. A comparative study: efficacy of tissue glue and sutures after impacted mandibular third molar removal. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011;10:310-5.
26. Vastani A, Maria A. Healing of Intraoral Wounds Closed Using Silk Sutures and Isoamyl 2-Cyanoacrylate Glue: A Comparative Clinical and Histologic Study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013; 71:241-8.
27. Knott PD, Zins JE, Banbury J, Djohan R, Yetman RJ, Papay F. A comparison of dermabond tissue adhesive and sutures in the primary repair of the congenital cleft lip. Ann Plast Surg 2007;58:121-5.
28. Tse DT, Panje WR, Anderson RL. Cyanoacrylate adhesive used to stop CSF leaks during orbital surgery. Arch Ophthalmol 1984;102:1337-9.
29. Avery JK. Oral Development and Histology, 2nd (ed).Williams and Wilkins. 1994;22:192-210.
30. Bruns TB, Worthinton JM. Using Tissue adhesive for wound repair: A practical guide to Dermobond. Am Fam Physician 2000;61:1383-8.
31. deAzevedo CL, Marques MM, Bombana AC. Cytotoxic effects of cyanoacrylates used as retrograde filling materials: an in vitro analysis. Pesqui Odontol Bras 2003;17:113-8.
32. Chen WL, Lin CT, Hsieh CY, Tu IH, Chen WY, Hu FR. Comparison of the bacteriostatic effects, corneal cytotoxicity, and the ability to seal corneal incisions among three different tissue adhesives. Cornea 2007;26:1228-34.
| ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 725 PDF Download: 1,992 |
||||
