Circumferential Vein Wrapping Versus Vein Sheath to Improve the Outcome of Peripheral Nerve Repair | ||||
| The Egyptian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery | ||||
| Article 10, Volume 43, Issue 1, January 2019, Page 55-60 PDF (6.51 MB) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/ejprs.2019.65156 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
| Ayman Noaman* 1; Ihab Abul Halim2; Hisham Elshitany2; Rama Ahmed1; Mohamed Ashraf3 | ||||
| 1The Departments of Plastic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University | ||||
| 2The Departments of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University | ||||
| 3The Departments of Plastic Surgery* and Neurosurgery**, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| Background: Trauma to peripheral nerves is relatively common which can be caused by blunt trauma or penetrating injuries. An important quality of the peripheral nervous system, as compared with the central nervous system, is its remarkable ability to recover after an injury. To improve the outcome in post-traumatic peripheral nerve injury beside precise suturing and orientation of the nerve stumps is to protect the anastomosis from the surrounding environment; this barrier should be biologically inert, biodegradable and non-compressive. Vein wrapping to the site of anastomosis was described to protect the neuro-anastomosis and to improve nerve conduction and prevent neuroma formation. Methods: This randomized controlled study was conducted on 60 patients presenting with either median or ulnar nerve injuries in the forearm, they were divided into 3 groups were group (A) The neuro-anastomosis was covered with a vein segment passed through one segment and after the neurorrhaphy the vein is stretched to cover the suture line, In Group < br />(B) The neuro-anastomosis was covered with a vein segment who was circumferentially wrapped, In Group (C) the neuro anastomosis was not covered with a vein wrap. Results: After 12 months follow-up were: Functional recovery of motor nerves, sensitivity and the presence of neuroma at the site of nerve both group A and B showed a more rapid motor and sensory recovery and a reduction of the painful symptoms compared to the control group (C). Conclusion: Both Vein wrapping techniques provides a valid solution to avoid the dispersion of the nerve fibers, adherent scars and painful neuromas formation. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| Peripheral nerve injury – Neuro-anastomosis –; Vein Wrapping – Neuroma | ||||
| References | ||||
|
1- Griffin M.F., Malahias M., Hindocha S. and Wasim S.: Peripheral Nerve Injury: Principles for Repair and Regeneration; The Open Orthopaedics Journal, 8, (Suppl 1: M10) 199-203, 2014. 2- Tessa G.: Nerve regeneration in the peripheral and central nervous systems: J. Physiol. Jul., 1; 594 (13): 3517-3520, 2016. 3- Seddon H.J.: Three types of nerve injury. Brain, 66: 237, 1943. 4- Sunderland S.: Nerves and nerve injuries. 2nd ed. Edinburgh, NY: Churchill and Livingstone, pp. 69-141, 1978. 5- Lars B. Dahlin and Mikael Wiberg: Nerve injuries of the upper extremity and hand; Effort Open Reviews, Volume 2, May 2017. 6- Farnebo S., Thorfinn J. and Dahlin L.B.: Peripheral nerve injuries of the upper extremity. In: Neligan P.C., Chang J., van Beek A.L., eds. Hand Surgery (A volume in the Plastic Surgery 6-Volume Set: Expert Consult Premium). Third ed. China: Elsevier Saunders, 2012. 7- David J. Gerth, Jun Tashiro and Seth R. Thaller: Clinical outcomes for Conduits and Scaffolds in peripheral nerve repair; World J. Clin. Cases February, 16; 3 (2): 141-147, 2015. 8- Hudson T.W., Evans G.R. and Schmidt C.E.: Engineering strategies for peripheral nerve repair. Orthop. Clin. North Am., 31: 485-49, 2000. 9- S. Leuzzi, A. Armenio, L. Leone, V. De Santis and A. di Turi: Repair of peripherial nerve with vein wrapping; G. Chir. March-April, Vol. 35, n. 314: 101-106, 2014. 10- Eser F., Aktekin L.A., Bodur H. and Atan C.: Etiological factors of traumatic peripheral nerve injuries. Neurol. India, 57: 434-7, 2009. 11- Karol A.G.: Peripheral nerves and Tendon Transfers. Selected Reading in Plastic Surgery, 9:23, 2003. 12- Mafi P., Hindocha S., Dhital M. and Saleh M.: Advances of Peripheral Nerve Repair Techniques to Improve Hand Function: A Systematic Review of Literature. The Open Orthopaedics Journal, 6 (Suppl 1: M7): 60-68, 2012. 13- Adanali G., Verdi M., Tuncel A., et al.: Effects of hyaluronic acid-carboxymethylcellulose membrane on extraneural adhesion formation and peripheral nerve regeneration. J. Reconstr. Microsurg., 19: 29-35, 2003. 14- Görgülü A., Imer M., Simsek O., et al.: The effect of aprotinin on extraneural scarring in peripheral nerve surgery: An experimental study. Acta. Neurochir. [Wien] 1998; 140: 1303-7. 316 L. Mathieu et al., Chirurgie de la main, 31: 311-317, 2012. 15- Petersen J., Russel L., Andrus K., et al.: Reduction of extraneural scarring by ADCON-T/N after surgical intervention. Neurosurgery, 38: 976-84, 1996. 16- Van der Avoort D.J., S.E.R. Hovius, R.W. Selles, J.W. van Neck and J.H. Coert: The incidence of symptomatic neuroma inamputation and neurorrhaphy patients. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, 66, 1330- 1334, 2013. 17- Mathieu L., Adam C., Legagneux J., Bruneval P. and Masmejean E.: Reduction of neural scarring after peripheral nerve suture: An experimental study about collagen membrane and autologous vein wrapping. Chirurgie de la main, 31: 311-317, 2012. 18- Vozzi G., Carlucci F., Salvadori C., Dini F., Vozzi F., Dominici C., Arispicim, Ciardelli G. and Giusti P.: L'uso di microguide bioerodibili nella. Nerve Regeneration Atti SICV, 12: 213-215, 2005. 19- Carlucci F., Dini F., Vozzi G., Vozzi F., Chiono V., Salvadori C., et al.: “The Tunnel Effect” using Bioerodable Tubes in Nerve Regeneration. Annali. Fac. Med. Vet., 2005, Lviii. 20- Delaviz H., Faghihi A., Delshad A. Azizzadeh, Bahadori Mohamad hadi, Mohamadi Jamshid and Roozbehi Amrollah: Repair of Peripheral Nerve Defects Using a Polyvinylidene Fluoride Channel Containing Nerve Growth Factor and Collagen Gel in Adult Rats. Cell Journal (Yakhteh), 13 (3): 137-142, 2011. 21- Chiu D.T. and Strauch B.: A prospective clinical evaluation of autogenous vein grafts used as a nerve conduit for distal sensory nerve defects of 3cm or less. Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 86: 928-934, 1990. 22- Walton R.L., Brown R.E., Matory W.E., Borah G.L. and Dolph J.L.: Autogenous vein graft repair of digital nerve defects in the finger: A retrospective clinical study. Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 84: 944-949; discussion 944-949, 1989. 60 Vol. 43, No. 1 / Improving Outcome of Nerve Repair 23- Mahboub T., Abdelkader R., Nawar A. and Attia M.: Evaluation of Vein Wrap around Peripheral Nerve Repair: An Experimental Study. Egypt, J. Plast. Reconstr. Surg., January 2017. 24- Islam A.A. and Mostafa E.S.: Autogenous Vein Wrapping for Treatment of Recurrent Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. Egypt, J. Plast. Reconstr. Surg., Vol. 34, No. 2, July, 173- 180, 2010. 25- Jianming Xu, Sokratis E. Varitimidis, Kenneth J. Fisher P., Matthew M.T., Dean G.S. and Pittsburgh P.A.: The Effect of Wrapping Scarred Nerves With Autogenous Vein Graft to Treat Recurrent Chronic Nerve Compression. The Journal of Hand Surgery, Vol. 25A No. 1 January 2000. 26- Zinon T.K., Sameer J. and Dean G. S.: Vein wrapping at cubital tunnel for ulnar nerve problems. J. Shoulder Elbow Surg., 19: 91-97, 2010 | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 354 PDF Download: 1,025 |
||||
