Shifting from the Reductive Mechanical to the Empowering Learner Training Model: A Metacognitive-in-Action Approach to Listening Instruction التحول من الميکانيکية الاختزالية إلى نموذج التدريب التمکيني للمتعلم: مدخل ما وراء معرفي تطبيقي لتدريس الاستماع
عبد العال،, ., سالم, . (2019). Shifting from the Reductive Mechanical to the Empowering Learner Training Model: A Metacognitive-in-Action Approach to Listening Instruction التحول من الميکانيکية الاختزالية إلى نموذج التدريب التمکيني للمتعلم: مدخل ما وراء معرفي تطبيقي لتدريس الاستماع. EKB Journal Management System, 38(181ج3), 861-898. doi: 10.21608/jsrep.2019.67578
عطية السيد عطية عبد العال،; محمد سليمان سالم. "Shifting from the Reductive Mechanical to the Empowering Learner Training Model: A Metacognitive-in-Action Approach to Listening Instruction التحول من الميکانيکية الاختزالية إلى نموذج التدريب التمکيني للمتعلم: مدخل ما وراء معرفي تطبيقي لتدريس الاستماع". EKB Journal Management System, 38, 181ج3, 2019, 861-898. doi: 10.21608/jsrep.2019.67578
عبد العال،, ., سالم, . (2019). 'Shifting from the Reductive Mechanical to the Empowering Learner Training Model: A Metacognitive-in-Action Approach to Listening Instruction التحول من الميکانيکية الاختزالية إلى نموذج التدريب التمکيني للمتعلم: مدخل ما وراء معرفي تطبيقي لتدريس الاستماع', EKB Journal Management System, 38(181ج3), pp. 861-898. doi: 10.21608/jsrep.2019.67578
عبد العال،, ., سالم, . Shifting from the Reductive Mechanical to the Empowering Learner Training Model: A Metacognitive-in-Action Approach to Listening Instruction التحول من الميکانيکية الاختزالية إلى نموذج التدريب التمکيني للمتعلم: مدخل ما وراء معرفي تطبيقي لتدريس الاستماع. EKB Journal Management System, 2019; 38(181ج3): 861-898. doi: 10.21608/jsrep.2019.67578

Shifting from the Reductive Mechanical to the Empowering Learner Training Model: A Metacognitive-in-Action Approach to Listening Instruction التحول من الميکانيکية الاختزالية إلى نموذج التدريب التمکيني للمتعلم: مدخل ما وراء معرفي تطبيقي لتدريس الاستماع

التربية (الأزهر): مجلة علمية محکمة للبحوث التربوية والنفسية والاجتماعية)
Article 17, Volume 38, 181ج3, January 2019, Page 861-898  XML PDF (667.13 K)
Document Type: بحوث فی مجال المناهج وطرق التدریس
DOI: 10.21608/jsrep.2019.67578
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
عطية السيد عطية عبد العال،; محمد سليمان سالم
تخصص المناهج وطرق تدريس اللغة الانجليزية، قسم المناهج، کلية التربية، جامعة الأزهر، القاهرة، مصر.
Abstract
         حاولت الدراسة الحالية التأصيل للتحول بمفهوم تدريب المتعلمين من کونه مجرد عملية  ميکانيکية تُختزل في تدريب المتعلم على عدد من الاستراتيجيات بشکل لا تکاملي ومنفصل، والتي لا يبدو أنها تأتي بثمارها من حيث تمکين الطلاب من التعامل مع مهارة الاستماع بأسلوب استراتيجي، للانتقال إلى مفهوم أوسع ونظرة أکثر شمولية تستهدف تمکين المتعلم من کفايات تعلم کيف تتعلم مرورا بمرحلة التمکين وانتهاءً بمرحلة استقلالية المتعلم والتي تمثل الغاية المثلي من العملية التعليمية. وقد عمدت الدراسة الحالية إلى استخدام المنهج التجريبي للکشف عن فعالية تطبيق نموذج التدريب التمکيني للمتعلم المستخدم في مدخل ما وراء المعرفة التطبيقي في تدريس الاستماع والذي ينطلق من مسلمة مؤداها المعرفة تسبق القدرة على إدارة الذات. ويرکز هذا النموذج على تمکين المتعلم من خلال تزويده وإمداده بالمعارف عن ما وراء المعرفة والأدوات واستخدام الاستراتيجيات على مدي زمني طويل وقياس أثر ذلک على تمية مهارات الاستماع لاختبار ال (IELTS)، تم تطبيق الدراسة التدخلية الحالية على عينة قوامها 60 طالب من طلاب کلية التربية – قسم اللغة الإنجليزية من خلال برنامج تدريبي استمر لمدة 7 أسابيع، تم فيه تصنيف المشارکين الي المستوي المتوسط Independent User من مستويات الکفاءة اللغوية وفقا للإطار الأوروبي المرجعي هما (B1 – B1(. وقد تبنت الدراسة التصميم التجريبي تصميم المجموعة الضابطة ذو التطبيقين القبلي والبعدي لمقارنة فاعلية نموذج التدريب التمکيني – مدخل ما وراء المعرفة التطبيقي (المجموعة التجريبية) - بالمدخل السائد لتدريس الاستماع (المجموعة الضابطة) في تنمية الفهم الاستماعيي کما يقيسه اختبار ال (IELTS) وفق مستوي الکفاءة اللغوية، وأشارت النتائج الي وجود فروق ذات دلالة إحصائية في تحسين الفهم الاستماعي بين مجموعتي الدراسة بغض النظر عن مستوي الکفاءة اللغوية لصالح المجوعة التجريبية. وفيما يتعلق بأثر التفاعل بين مدخل تعليم الاستماع ومستوي الکفاءة اللغوية فقد اشارت نتائج التحليل الاحصائي الي وجود فروق ذات دلالة إحصائية بين مدخل ما وراء المعرفة التطبيقي ومستوي الکفاءة B2 ، ومن ثم فإن مدخل ما وراء المعرفة التطبيقي الذي استهدف بناء ملفات تعريفية للمتعلم بنفسه کمتعلم(Person Knowledge) وتنمية معرفتهم بمهامهم ( (Task Knowledge، و العمليات التي تنضوي عليها مهارة الاستماع (Process Knowledge(  حسن من فرص المشارکين واستعدادهم لتعلم کيفية الاستماع بأسلوب استراتيجي فعال ونقدي، کما أتاح لهم الفرصة لزيادة قدرتهم علي إدارة فرص التعلم الخاصة بهم.
The current study departs from the concept of ‘learner training’ as simply a mechanical training in a number of discrete strategies which does not seem to help students learn how to listen strategically to the broader view of learner training where learning to learn, empowerment and learner autonomy are the ultimate goals. The study empirically probes the effects of an empowering learner training model, deployed in a metacognition-in-action approach to listening instruction, that rests on the firm view that knowledge precedes control. This model focuses on empowering learners with metacognitive knowledge and strategy use over a long-time duration on developing IELTS listening comprehension.  An intervention study of seven weeks listening programme was undertaken with 60 EFL college students of two proficiency levels. A pre-post design was adopted to compare the effect of the metacognitive-in action approach (experimental group) with the prevalent listening approach (control group) on developing IELTS listening comprehension of B1 and B2 proficiency level students. Results revealed significant differences in IELTS listening attainment between the two groups of the study regardless of the proficiency level in favour of the metacognition- in-action approach. Furthermore, the interaction effect was significant in favour of the metacognitive-in-action approach and the B2 level.  In effect, the metacognition- in-action approach that caters for building students’ profiles of themselves as learners, of listening as a process and of their task knowledge increases students’ opportunities and readiness to learn how to listen effectively, critically and strategically and be more able to manage their learning opportunities.
Keywords
Reductive and mechanical model of learner training; Metacognition; metacognition-in-action-approach; IELTS listening; strategy-based instruction; metacognitive knowledge; metacognitive strategies; cognitive strategies. تدريب المتعلمين - نموذج التدريب التمکيني - مدخل ما وراء المعرفة التطبيقي في تدريس الاستماع – استراتيجيات ما وراء المعرفة- الک
References

Arabic & English References:

  1. Ahmadi, K., Gharacheh, A., Dashtaki, A. & Ebdam, R. (2014). The Effect of Metacognitive Learning Strategies Training on Listening Performance of Iranian Intermediate English Language learners.  International Journal of Psychology and Behavioural Research, 3(6), pp.499 – 503. [Online] Available at: http://www.ijpbrjournal.com.
  2. Anderson, J. R. (1983). Integrated skills reinforcement: Reading, writing, speaking, and listening across the curriculum. Longman Publishing Group.
  3. Anderson, J. R. (2015). Cognitive psychology and its implications.8th ed. Freeman Publisher.
  4. Anderson, J., Greeno, J., Kline, P., & Neves, D. (1981). Acquisition of problem-solving skill. Cognitive skills and their acquisition, 191-230.
  5. Benson, P. (2001). Applied Linguistics in action: teaching and researching autonomy in language learning. Harlow: Longman.
  6. Benson, P. (2002). Autonomy and communication. In Benson, B. & Toogood, S. (Eds.), Learner autonomy: Challenges to research and practice (pp. 10–28)..
  7. Blidi, S. (2017). Collaborative learner autonomy. Springer Singapore.
  8. Bozorgian, H. (2015). Less-skilled learners benefit more from metacognitive instruction to develop listening comprehension. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning, 4(1), 3-12.
  9. Brown, A., Bransford, J., Ferrara, R.  & Campione, J. (1983). Learning, remembering, and understanding. In Flavell, J. & Markham, E. (Eds.), Carmichael’s manual of child psychology, 1, 14- 21.
 

  1. Brown, A., & Palincsar, A. (1982). Inducing strategic learning from texts by means of informed, self-control training. Topics in Learning and Learning Disabilities, 2, pp, 1-17262.
  2. Brown, D. (1994). Principles of language learning and teaching (3rd edition.) Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  3. Buck, G. (1995). How to become a good listening teacher. In Mendelsohn, D. & Rubin, J. (Eds.) A guide for the teaching of second language listening, 113-131, San Diego: Dominie Press.
  4. Chamot, A. (1993). Student responses to learning strategy instruction in the foreign language classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 26(3),               308-321.
  5. Chamot, A. (1995). Learning strategies and listening comprehension. In Mendelsohn, D. & Rubin, J. (Eds.) A guide for the teaching of second language listening, 13- 30, San Diego: Dominie Press.
  6. Chamot, A. & O’Malley, J. (1994). The CALLA handbook: Implementing the cognitive academic language learning approach. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
  7. Chamot, A., & O'Malley, J. (1996). The cognitive academic language learning approach: A model for linguistically diverse classrooms. The elementary school journal, 96(3), 259-273.
  8. Chamot, A., Barnhardt, S., Beard El-Dinary, P., & Robbins, J. (1999). The learning strategy handbook. New York: Addison Wesley Longman.
  9. Chamot, A., Barnhardt, S., El-Dinary, P., & Robbins, J. (1996). Methods for teaching learning strategies in the foreign language classroom. In Oxford, R. (ed.) Language learning strategies around the world: Cross-cultural perspectives, (Technical Report 13), pp. 175-187. Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Centre, University of Hawaii’, Honolulu HI
  10. Chen, Y. (2005). Barriers to Acquiring Listening Strategies for EFL Learners and Their Pedagogical Implications. TESL-EJ, 8 (4), 1-19.
  11. Chen, Y. (2007). Learning to learn: The impact of strategy training. ELT Journal, 61(1), 20-29.
  12. Cohen, A. (1990). Language learning: Insights for learners, teachers, and researchers. Heinle & Heinle.
  13. Cohen, A. (1998). Strategies in learning and using a second language. Harlow, Essex: Longman.
  14. Cohen, A. (1999). Language learning strategies instruction and research. In Cotterall, S.& Crabbe, D. (Eds). Learner autonomy in language learning: Defining the field and effecting change, pp. 61-68. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
  15. Cohen, A. (2011). Second language learner strategies. In Hinkel, E. (ed.) Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning, 2, pp. 681-698, Routledge, NY.
  16. Cohen, A., & Macaro, E. (2007). Language learner strategies: Thirty years of research and practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  17. Cohen, A., & Scott, K. (1996). A synthesis of approaches to assessing language learning strategies. In Oxford, R. (ed.) Language learning strategies around the world: Cross-cultural perspectives, (Technical Report 13), pp. 89-106. Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Centre, University of Hawaii’, Honolulu HI
  18. Cohen, A., Weaver, S., & Li, T. (1996). The impact of strategies-based instruction on speaking a foreign language. Working paper, University of Minnesota, Center for Advanced Research in Language Acquisition CARLA.
  19. Crabbe, D. (1999). Defining the field: introduction. In Cotterall, S &Crabbe, D. (Eds.). Learner autonomy in language learning: Defining the field and effecting change. Peter Lang Edition.
  20. Cross, J. (2010). Metacognitive instruction for helping less-skilled listeners. ELT journal, 65(4), 408-416.
  21. Cross, J. (2011). Social‐cultural‐historical contradictions in an L2 listening lesson: A joint activity system analysis. Language Learning, 61(3), 820-867.
  22. DeKeyser, R. (2007). Practice in a second language: Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  23. Dickinson, L. (1987). Self-instruction in language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  24. Ellis, G., & Sinclair, B. (1986). A Systematic Programme of Learner Training: Train the Learner to Learn More Effectively. Techniques of Teaching: from Theory to Practice. Londres: Modern English Publications in Association with the British Council.
  25. Ellis, G., & Sinclair, B. (1989). Learning to learn English: A course in learner training (learner's book). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  26. Ellis, R. (1999). Learning a second language through interaction. John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam.
  27. Field, J. (2012). Listening instruction. In Burns A. & Richards, J. (Eds.). The Cambridge Guide to Pedagogy and Practice in Second Language Teaching. NY: Cambridge University Press.
  28. Fujiwara, B. (1990). Learner training in listening strategies. JALT Journal, 12(2), 203-217.
  29. Goh, C. (1997). Metacognitive awareness and second language listeners. ELT journal, 51(4), 361-369.
  30. Goh, C. (2008). Metacognitive instruction for second language listening development: Theory, practice and research implications. RELC journal, 39(2), 188-213.
  31. Goh, C. (2010). Listening as process: Learning activities for self-appraisal and self-regulation. In Harwood, N. (ed.), Materials in ELT: Theory and practice, pp. 179 -206. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  32. Graham, C. R. (2006). Listening comprehension: the learners’ perspective. System, 34, 165-182.
  33. Grant, L. (1997). Listening to English in the 21st century: The need for learner strategies. Paper presented in the third EFL Skills Conference, pp. 65-71. American University in Cairo, Cairo, Egypt
  34. Higgins, J. (1996). Students’ listening difficulties: The contribution of speech rate. Paper presented in the third EFL Skills Conference, pp. 10-18. American University in Cairo, Cairo, Egypt
  35. Holec, H. (1985). On autonomy: some elementary concepts. Discourse and learning, 985, 173-190.
  36. McDonough, S. (1995). Strategy and skill in learning a foreign language. London: Arnold.
  37. McDonough, S. (1999a). Learner Strategies. Language Teaching, 32, pp.1-18
  38. McDonough, S. (1999b). A hierarchy of strategies. In Cotterall S.&. Grabbe, D.  (Eds.) Learner autonomy in language learning: defining the field and effecting change, pp. 51-60. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
  39. Mendelson, D., (1994). Learning to listen: A Strategy-Based Approach for the Second language learner. San Diego: Dominie Press.
  40. Mendelson, D., (1995). Applying learning strategies in the second/foreign language listening comprehension lesson. In Mendelsohn, D. & Rubin, J. (Eds.) A guide for the teaching of second language listening, pp. 132-150. San Diego: Dominie Press
  41. Mendelsohn, D. (1998). Teaching listening. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 18, 81-101
  42. Mendelson, D., & Rubin, J. (1995). A guide for the teaching of second language listening. San Diego: Dominie Press.
  43. O'Malley, J., Chamot, A., Stewner‐Manzanares, G., Küpper, L and Russo, R. (1985a). Learning strategy use by beginners and intermediate EFL students. Language Learning, 35, pp. 21-46.
  44. Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. New York: Newbury House.
  45. Oxford, R. L. (2002). Language learning strategies in a nutshell: Update and ESL suggestions. Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice, 4(3), 124-132.
  46. Oxford, R. L. (2011). Applied Linguistic in-action series. Teaching and researching language learning strategies. Pearson Education Limited.
  47. Oxford, R. L. (2017). Teaching and researching language learning strategies: Self-regulation in Context (2nd ed.). Routledge
  48. Oxford, R., & Leaver, B. (1996). A synthesis of strategy instruction for language learners. In Oxford, R. (ed.) Language learning strategies around the world: cross-cultural Perspectives (Technical Report 13), pp227-146. Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Centre, University of Hawaii’, Honolulu HI. 
  49. Paulauskas, S. (1994). The effects of strategy training on the aural comprehension of L2 adult learners at the high beginning/low intermediate proficiency level. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Toronto.
  50. Plonsky, L. (2011). The effectiveness of second language strategy instruction: A meta‐analysis. Language learning, 61(4), 993-1038.
  51. Rost, M. (1994). Introducing Listening. Penguin Group, London.
  52. Rost, M. (2002). Applied linguistics in action: teaching and researching listening. Harlow: Longman. 
  53. Rost, M. (2011). Applied linguistics in action: teaching and researching listening. (2nd ed), Longman, London 
  54. Rost, M., & Ross, S. (1991). Learner use of strategies in interaction: Typology and teachability. Language learning, 41(2), 235-268.
  55. Rubin, J. (1994). A review of second language listening comprehension research. The Modern Language Journal, 78(2), 199-221.
  56. Rubin, J. (1995). An overview to a guide for the teaching of second language listening. In Mendelsohn, D. & Rubin, J. (Eds.) A guide for the teaching of second language listening, pp.7-12. San Diego: Dominie Press.
  57. Rubin, J., Chamot, A. U., Harris, V., & Anderson, N. J. (2008). Intervening in the use of strategies. In Cohen, A. & Macaro, E. (Eds.) Language Learner Strategies: thirty years of research and practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press
  58. Schwartz, A. (1992). The effect of interactive video training in listening techniques, metacognition and attribution on the listening comprehension of second language video. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Maryland.
  59. Sinclair, B. (2000). Learner autonomy: The next phase? In Sinclair, B., McGrath, I & Lamb, T., (eds.). Learner autonomy, teacher autonomy: Future directions. The British Council, Pearson Education Limited, England.
  60. Thompson, I., & Rubin, J. (1996). Can strategy instruction improve listening comprehension? Foreign Language Annals, 29(3), 331-342.
  61. Thornbury, S. (2012). Speaking instruction. In J.C. Richards & A. Burns (eds.), Cambridge guide to pedagogy and practice in second language teaching (pp.198 – 206). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  62. Vandergrift, L. (1992). The comprehension strategies of second language (French) listeners. ) PhD (, University of Alberta.
  63. Vandergrift, L. (1996). The listening comprehension strategies of core French high school students, Canadian Modern Language Review, 52,200-23
  64. Vandergrift, L. (1996). The listening comprehension strategies of core French high school students. Canadian Modern Language Review, 52, 200-223.
  65. Vandergrift, L. (2002). Listening: theory and practice in modern foreign language competence.
  66. Vandergrift, L. (2003). Orchestrating strategy use: Toward a model of the skilled second language listener. Language learning, 53(3), 463-496.
  67. Vandergrift, L. (2004). Learning to listen or listening to learn? Annual review of Applied Linguistics, 24,         3-25.
  68. Vandergrift, L. (2007). Recent developments in second and foreign language listening comprehension research. Language Teaching, 40(3), 191-210.
  69. Vandergrift, L., & Baker, S. (2015). Learner variables in second language listening comprehension: An exploratory path analysis. Language Learning, 65(2), 390-416.
  70. Vandergrift, L., & Goh, C. C. (2012). Teaching and learning second language listening: Metacognition in action. Routledge.
  71. Vandergrift, L., & Tafaghodtari, M. H. (2010). Teaching L2 learners how to listen does make a difference: An empirical study. Language learning, 60(2), 470-497.
  72. Vandergrift, L., Goh, C. C., Mareschal, C. J., & Tafaghodtari, M. H. (2006). The metacognitive awareness listening questionnaire: Development and validation. Language learning, 56(3), 431-462.
  73. Victoria, M., & Lockhart, W. (1995). Enhancing metacognition in self-directed language learning. System, 23(2), 223-234.
  74. Wenden, A. (1986a). Incorporating learner training in the classroom. System, 14, 315-325. Wenden 1998
  75. Wenden, A. (1986b). What do second language learners know about their language learning? A second look at retrospective accounts. Applied Linguistics, 7,             186-205.
  76. Wenden, A. (1991). Learner strategies for learner autonomy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  77. Wenden, A. (1995). Learner training in context: a knowledge-based approach. System, 23, 183-194.
  78. Wenden, A. (1997). Designing learner training: the curricular questions. In Jacobs, G. (ed.) Language classrooms of tomorrow: issues and response. RELC Anthology, Series, 38.
  79. Wenden, A. (1998). Metacognitive knowledge and language learning. Applied Linguistics, 19, 515-537.
  80. Wenden, A. (1999). An introduction to metacognitive knowledge and beliefs in language learning: beyond the basics. System, 27, 435-414.
  81. Wenden, A. (2002). Learner development in language learning. Applied Linguistics, 23, 32-55.
  82. Wenden, A. L. (1996). Learner representations in language learning: relevance and function. In Proceedings of the international conference' AUTONOMY 2000': the development of learning independence in language learning (pp. 234-253).
  83. Wenden, A., & Rubin, J. (1987). Learner strategies in language learning. Prentice/Hall International.
  84. White, G. (2008). Listening and good language learners. In C. Griffiths (Ed.), Lessons from Good Language Learners (208-17). Edinburgh: Cambridge University Press.
 

Statistics
Article View: 254
PDF Download: 405