REDUCTIONOF IRONIN INDUSTRIALWASTEWATER USINGFLOW-BY POROUS ELECTRODES | ||
| Journal of Advanced Engineering Trends | ||
| Article 4, Volume 38, Issue 2, July 2019, Pages 71-79 PDF (690.56 K) | ||
| DOI: 10.21608/jaet.2020.72999 | ||
| Authors | ||
| Rasha A. Hefny* 1; Omar E. Abdel-Salam E. Abdel-Salam2; Ali M. Basstawesy1; Mohamed H. Mahmoud2 | ||
| 1chemical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Minia University, Egypt | ||
| 2chemical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Cairo University, Egypt | ||
| Abstract | ||
| Many industries produce and discharge large quantities of dilute metal ion solutions from the acid treatment of alloys, electroplating rinses, and leaches and effluents from the manufacture of chemicals. This discharge is considered to be a serious environmental threat. Electrochemical treatment is used as a sustainable effective technology for removal of heavy metals. In this study, experiments were carried out using a bench-scale electrochemical cell incorporating flow-by porous graphite electrodes for deposition of iron. The effect of current density, feed flow rate, and initial iron concentration on removal efficiency and current efficiency were studied. Experimental results showed that the maximum removal efficiencies(99.7%) and (99.9%) were obtained at flow rate of 0.278 ml/s, for initial iron concentration of 100 ppm and 200 ppm respectively. For concentration of 50 ppm it was 99.48% at flow rate of 1.11 ml/s, current density of 0.98 mA/cm2 and pH of 4. and maximum current efficiencies were 53% at 100 ppm , 99.9% at 200 ppm ,at flow rate of 0.833 ml/s, and 38.05% at 50 ppm at flow rate of 1.11 ml/s all obtained at current density of 0.98 mA/cm2. Solution pH in the range of 3 to 5 has a little effect on the deposition of iron. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Iron removal; Heavy metals; electrochemical cell; flow-by electrode; Wastewater | ||
| References | ||
|
1. SALEHZADEH, J., Removal of Heavy Metals Pb2+, Cu2+, Zn2+, Cd2+, Ni2+, Co2+ and Fe3+ from Aqueous Solutions by using Xanthium Pensylvanicum. Leonardo Journal of Sciences(23): p. 97-104, 2013. 2. Fu, F. and Q. Wang, Removal of heavy metal ions from wastewaters: a review. Journal of environmental management 92(3): p. 407-418, 2011. 3. Ku, Y. and I.-L. Jung, Photocatalytic reduction of Cr (VI) in aqueous solutions by UV irradiation with the presence of titanium dioxide. Water Research 35(1): p. 135-142, 2001. 4. Kang, S.-Y., et al., Competitive adsorption characteristics of Co2+, Ni2+, and Cr3+ by IRN-77 cation exchange resin in synthesized wastewater. Chemosphere 56(2): p. 141-147, 2004. 5. Jusoh, A., L.S. Shiung, and M. Noor, A simulation study of the removal efficiency of granular activated carbon on cadmium and lead. Desalination 206(1-3): p. 9-16, 2007. 6. Kang, K.C., et al., Sorption of Cu2+ and Cd2+ onto acid-and base-pretreated granular activated carbon and activated carbon fiber samples. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry 14(1): p. 131-135, 2008. 7. Landaburu-Aguirre, J., et al., The removal of zinc from synthetic wastewaters by micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration: statistical design of experiments. Desalination 240(1-3): p. 262-269, 2009. 8. Mohsen-Nia, M., P. Montazeri, and H. Modarress, Removal of Cu2+ and Ni2+ from wastewater with a chelating agent and reverse osmosis processes. Desalination 217(1-3): p. 276-281, 2007. 9. El Samrani, A., B. Lartiges, and F. Villiéras, Chemical coagulation of combined sewer overflow: Heavy metal removal and treatment optimization. Water research 42(4-5): p. 951-960, 2008. 10. Mahmoud, M.H., et al., Removal of urea from industrial wastewater using electrochemical decomposition. Journal of Life Science 10(3), 2013. 11. Mohan, N., N. Balasubramanian, and C.A. Basha, Electrochemical oxidation of textile wastewater and its reuse. Journal of hazardous materials147(1-2): p. 644-651, 2007. 12. Chen, G., Electrochemical technologies in wastewater treatment. Separation and purification Technology38(1): p. 11-41,2004. 13. Belkacem, M., M. Khodir, and S. Abdelkrim, Treatment characteristics of textile wastewater and removal of heavy metals using the electroflotation technique. Desalination228(1-3): p. 245-254,2008. 14. Issabayeva, G., M.K. Aroua, and N.M. Sulaiman, Electrodeposition of copper and lead on palm shell activated carbon in a flow-through electrolytic cell. Desalination 194(1-3): p. 192-201,2006. 15. Abdel-Salam, O.E., et al., Removal of Lead from Industrial Wastewater Using Flow-by-Porous Electrode. Portugaliae Electrochimica Acta 32(1): p. 65-75, 2014. 16. Saleh, M.M., On the effectiveness factor of flow-through porous electrodes. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 108(35): p. 13419-13426, 2004. 17. Joseph, B. and S. Authur, Water and Waste Control for the Plating Shop. Gradner Publication 1994. 18. Daewon P, D.C., Jeh BJ. , Water Research 35: p. 57, 2011. 19. Alkire, R. and P.K. Ng, Studies on Flow‐By Porous Electrodes Having Perpendicular Directions of Current and Electrolyte Flow. Journal of the Electrochemical Society 124(8): p. 1220-1227, 1977. | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 247 PDF Download: 318 |
||
