COMPARISON BETWEEN MAXILLARY SINUS LIFTING IN COMBINATION WITH IMPLANT PLACEMENT WITH VERSUS WITHOUT BONE GRAFTS (CLINICAL AND RADIOGRAPHIC STUDY)
El-Prince, O., Ragab, H. (2020). COMPARISON BETWEEN MAXILLARY SINUS LIFTING IN COMBINATION WITH IMPLANT PLACEMENT WITH VERSUS WITHOUT BONE GRAFTS (CLINICAL AND RADIOGRAPHIC STUDY). EKB Journal Management System, 66(Issue 1 - January (Oral Surgery)), 113-122. doi: 10.21608/edj.2020.77522
Omar N. El-Prince; Hala R. Ragab. "COMPARISON BETWEEN MAXILLARY SINUS LIFTING IN COMBINATION WITH IMPLANT PLACEMENT WITH VERSUS WITHOUT BONE GRAFTS (CLINICAL AND RADIOGRAPHIC STUDY)". EKB Journal Management System, 66, Issue 1 - January (Oral Surgery), 2020, 113-122. doi: 10.21608/edj.2020.77522
El-Prince, O., Ragab, H. (2020). 'COMPARISON BETWEEN MAXILLARY SINUS LIFTING IN COMBINATION WITH IMPLANT PLACEMENT WITH VERSUS WITHOUT BONE GRAFTS (CLINICAL AND RADIOGRAPHIC STUDY)', EKB Journal Management System, 66(Issue 1 - January (Oral Surgery)), pp. 113-122. doi: 10.21608/edj.2020.77522
El-Prince, O., Ragab, H. COMPARISON BETWEEN MAXILLARY SINUS LIFTING IN COMBINATION WITH IMPLANT PLACEMENT WITH VERSUS WITHOUT BONE GRAFTS (CLINICAL AND RADIOGRAPHIC STUDY). EKB Journal Management System, 2020; 66(Issue 1 - January (Oral Surgery)): 113-122. doi: 10.21608/edj.2020.77522

COMPARISON BETWEEN MAXILLARY SINUS LIFTING IN COMBINATION WITH IMPLANT PLACEMENT WITH VERSUS WITHOUT BONE GRAFTS (CLINICAL AND RADIOGRAPHIC STUDY)

Egyptian Dental Journal
Article 6, Volume 66, Issue 1 - January (Oral Surgery), January 2020, Page 113-122  XML PDF (1.3 MB)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/edj.2020.77522
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Omar N. El-Prince1; Hala R. Ragab2
1Lecturer of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, MUST University, Egypt.
2Assistant Professor of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Egypt
Abstract
Objective: The current study assessed the success of infiltration anesthesia versus inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) anesthesia during (mobile and non-vital) teeth extraction in posterior mandible.
Materials and methods: In a prospective study, 120 patients were included to extract one tooth for each patient in the posterior mandible under local anesthesia either by local infiltration = 60 (18 males, 42 females); or IANB = 60 (32 males, 28 females). Comparing anesthetic success rate of the two techniques and time until onset of anesthetic action (min).
Results: IANB was successful in 100% of the patients, where infiltration anesthesia succeeded in 85%. In addition, duration until onset of action was found to be equal with p =(0.7)
Conclusion: Infiltration technique offers a simpler substitute with less complication compared to IANB in establishing effective anesthesia for mandibular mobile and non-vital posterior teeth during intra-alveolar dental extractions.
Keywords
IANB; infiltration; Extraction; Lidocaine; mandibular molars
Statistics
Article View: 312
PDF Download: 445