COMPARISON BETWEEN MAXILLARY SINUS LIFTING IN COMBINATION WITH IMPLANT PLACEMENT WITH VERSUS WITHOUT BONE GRAFTS (CLINICAL AND RADIOGRAPHIC STUDY) | ||
| Egyptian Dental Journal | ||
| Article 6, Volume 66, Issue 1 - January (Oral Surgery), January 2020, Pages 113-122 PDF (1.3 M) | ||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||
| DOI: 10.21608/edj.2020.77522 | ||
| Authors | ||
| Omar N. El-Prince1; Hala R. Ragab2 | ||
| 1Lecturer of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, MUST University, Egypt. | ||
| 2Assistant Professor of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Egypt | ||
| Abstract | ||
| Objective: The current study assessed the success of infiltration anesthesia versus inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) anesthesia during (mobile and non-vital) teeth extraction in posterior mandible. Materials and methods: In a prospective study, 120 patients were included to extract one tooth for each patient in the posterior mandible under local anesthesia either by local infiltration = 60 (18 males, 42 females); or IANB = 60 (32 males, 28 females). Comparing anesthetic success rate of the two techniques and time until onset of anesthetic action (min). Results: IANB was successful in 100% of the patients, where infiltration anesthesia succeeded in 85%. In addition, duration until onset of action was found to be equal with p =(0.7) Conclusion: Infiltration technique offers a simpler substitute with less complication compared to IANB in establishing effective anesthesia for mandibular mobile and non-vital posterior teeth during intra-alveolar dental extractions. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| IANB; infiltration; Extraction; Lidocaine; mandibular molars | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 330 PDF Download: 452 |
||
