SAVING IRRIGATION WATER AND IMPROVING WATER PRODUCTIVITY IN RICE CULTIVATION BY INDUCING GOOD LAND LEVELING AND NEW PLANTING METHOD IN NORTH NILE DELTA, EGYPT | ||||
| Misr Journal of Agricultural Engineering | ||||
| Article 14, Volume 32, Issue 2, April 2015, Page 629-642 PDF (670.54 K) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/mjae.2015.98609 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
| M. A. Metwally1; Gh. Sh. El-Atawy2 | ||||
| 1Agric. Eng. Res. Inst., Agric. Res. Center, Giza, Egypt | ||||
| 2Soils, Water and Environment Res. Inst., Agric. Res. Center, Giza, Egypt. | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| Two field experiments were conducted at Sakha Agricultural Research Station, Kafr El-Sheikh Governorate, Egypt. during the two successive seasons of 2012 and 2013. The rice cultivar was Sakha 104. The experiment was designed as a split split-plot design with four replicates. Results showed that both submerged depth of 9 and 7cm significantly increased grain yield, plant height, number of panicles/hill, number of tillers/hill, panicle length, panicle weight, 1000 grains weight and seasonal applied irrigation water compared to submerged depth of 5cm (d3), there were no significant differences between submerged depth of d1 and d2. Planting in bottom of beds (M3) significantly increased grain yield by 8.48%, plant height by 4.38%, number of panicles/hill by 8.34%, number of tillers/hill by 10.58%, panicle length by 16.9%, Panicle weight by 6.62% and 1000 grains weight by 6.83%, compared to M1. The highest mean values of grain yield (12.51 ton ha-1), plant height (113cm), No. of panicles/hill (31), No. of tillers/hill (32), panicle length (28cm), panicle weight (2.98 gm) and 1000 grain weight (30.91 gm) were obtained from interaction between (L2 x M3 x d2). Average amounts of the applied irrigation water were 13885, 11519 and 8919 m3/ha-1, for (M1), (M2) and (M3), respectively. According the highest mean values of productivity of irrigation water (PIW) (1.480 kg grain m-3) was obtained from combination between (L2 x M3 x d3), So, method of (M3) saved about 35.8% of the irrigation water applied and increased productivity of irrigation water (PIW) by 13% compared to (M1).Therefore, method of planting in bottom of beds could be recommended for planting rice crop under laser leveling in North Delta Egypt. Abbreviations: Productivity of irrigation water (PIW), land leveling (L), Planting method (M) and irrigation water depth (d). | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| rice; irrigation; water saving; water productivity | ||||
| References | ||||
|
Ali, M. H.; M. R. Hoque; A. A. Hassa and A. Khair (2007). Effect of deficit irrigation on yield, water productivity and economic returns of wheat. Agric.Water Manag. 92:151-161.
Atta, Y. I. M. (2005). Strip planting of rice: A new method for increasing water use efficiency under splitting of nitrogen fertilizer. Egypt. J. of Appl. Sci. 20 (10B): 501-511.
Atta, Y. I. M.; M. E.Meleha; A. Tallet and U. M.Gawish (2006). Improving water productivity in rice cultivation with high potential for water saving. The 3rd Arab world region conference, Cairo.
Beecher, H. G.; B. W. Dunn ; J. A. Thompson ; E. Humphreys ; S. K. Mathews and J. Timsina (2006). Effect of raised beds, irrigation and nitrogen management on growth, water use and yield of rice in south-eastern Australia. Australian J. of Experimental Agriculture. 46 (10): 1363-1372.
Choudhury B. U.; B. A. M. Bouman and A. K.Singh (2007). Yield and water productivity of rice–wheat on raised beds, results from a field experiment at New Delhi, India Field Crops Res. 100, 229–239.
El-Atawy, Gh. Sh. (2012). Saving Irrigation Water and Improving Water Productivity in Rice Cultivation by Inducing New Planting Method in North Delta, Egypt. J. Soil Sci. and Agric. Engineering, Mansoura Univ., 3 (5): 587-599.
Gomez, K. A. and A. A. Gomez (1984). Statistical procedures for agricultural research. Johns Willey and Sons. Inc. New York, USA.
Jagroop K.; Mahey R. K.; Vashist K.K. and Mahal S.S. (2007). Growth and productivity of rice (Oryza sativa L.) and water expense efficiency as influenced by different planting techniques. Environment and Ecology. 25(1): 235-238.
Khattak S. I.; K. Usman, Q. Khan and A. Qayyum (2006). Impact of various planting techniques on yield and yield components of rice. Indus J. of Plant Sciences. 5(1): 753-756.
Meleha, M. E.; A.Z. El-Bably; A. A. Abd Allah and W. M. El-Khoby (2008). Producing more rice with less water by inducing planting methods in north Delta, Egypt. J. Agric. Sci., Mansoura Univ., 33 (1): 805-813.
Mishra, V. and R. Saha (2007). Effect of raised sunken bed system on inter-plot water harvesting and productivity of rice and French bean in Meghalaya. Indian J. of Agric. Sci. 77 (2): 73-78.
Molden, D.; R.Sakthivadivel and Z. Habib (2001). Basin-level use and productivity of water: examples from South Asia. Research report 49, International Water Management Institute (IWMI), Colombo, Sri Lanka, : 24.
Rijsberman, F. (2001). Can the CGIAR solve the world water crisis? Paper presented at the CGIAR mid-term meeting 2001 in Durban, South Africa, : 7.
Vethaiya B.; J. K. Ladha; K. R. Gupta; R. K. Naresh; R. S. Mehla and S. Yadvinder (2003). Technology options for rice in the rice wheat rotation in South Asia. Improving the productivity and sustainability of rice wheat rotation: Issues and Impacts Proceedings of an International Sym., USA, 22 October, 115-147.
Vories, E. D.; P. A. Counce; and T. C. Keisling. (2002). Comparison of flooded and furrow-irrigated rice on clay. Irrig. Sci. 21:139-144.
Waller, R. A. and D. B. Duncan. (1969). Symmetric multiple Comparison Problem. Amer. Stat.Assoc. Jour.December, 1485-1503 | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 197 PDF Download: 232 |
||||
