EKB Journal Management System


1.	Accuracy of implant positions recorded by intra-oral implant scanning and extra-oral implant scanning protocols for both open- and closed-tray conventional implant impression techniques in Class I Kennedy classification models.
	Volume 71, Issue 4, October 2025, Pages 3351-3361
	Ehab Ahmed Reyad; Ahmed Mustafa Hashim Kotb; Amal Mahmoud Ibrahim
	View Article PDF 2.14 M

2.	Accuracy of Two Digital Scanners (Intraoral, Extraoral) Compared to Conventional Impression Using Implant with Different Angulations (Zero, 15°,25°) “In-Vitro Study”
	Volume 4, Issue 2, December 2024, Pages 172-188
	Kirollos Ashraf Rafla; Rana Mahmoud Sherif; Lomaya Ghanem
	View Article PDF 760.83 K

3.	Effect of layer thickness, inner structure, and implant angulation on the accuracy of 3D printed models with implant analogs
	Volume 70, Issue 2, April 2024, Pages 1567-1575
	Ingy Nouh; Nancy Rafla; Omar Ahmed El Sergany
	View Article PDF 632.03 K

4.	The Accuracy Of Digital Versus Conventional Open Tray Implant Impression Technique, In Partially Edentulous Patients.
	Volume 67, Issue 4, October 2021, Pages 3579-3585
	MOHAMED ABDALLA; Mohamed Dohiem
	View Article PDF 1.19 M

5.	Accuracy of digital impression technique versus conventional technique for completely edentulous patient: a controlled clinical trial.
	Volume 67, Issue 4, October 2021, Pages 3587-3594
	Mohamed dohiem
	View Article PDF 1.37 M

Accuracy of implant positions recorded by intra-oral implant scanning and extra-oral implant scanning protocols for both open- and closed-tray conventional implant impression techniques in Class I Kennedy classification models.