INFLUENCE OF DRIP IRRIGATION MANAGEMENT ON SUGAR BEET YIELD AND SOME WATER RELATIONS AT NORTH NILE DELTA | ||||
| Misr Journal of Agricultural Engineering | ||||
| Article 12, Volume 30, Issue 3, July 2013, Page 785-804 PDF (573.4 K) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/mjae.2013.102013 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
| M. A. Metwally1; A. A. Mady2; Gh. Sh. El-Atawy3 | ||||
| 1Agric. Eng. Res. Ins., Agric. Res. Center, Giza, Egypt. | ||||
| 2Water Management and Irrigation Systems Res. Inst., NWRC, Cairo, Egypt. | ||||
| 3Soils, Water and Environment Res. Ins., Agric. Res. Center, Giza, Egypt. | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| Two field experiments have been conducted at the experimental farm of Agriculture Faculty, Kafr El-Sheikh University, Kafr El-Sheikh Governorate (31° 05’ N latitude and 30° 56’ E longitude) during the two successive growing seasons of 2009/2010 and 2010/2011 to study the overall effect of drip irrigation management on sugar beet productivity, its components and some water relations in clay soil in North Nile Delta. The treatments were arranged in a split plot design with four replicates. The main plots were assigned to three types emitters of drip irrigation system namely: built-in, simple orifice and long-path. Three irrigation regimes i.e. 10 minutes daily, 20 minutes every two days and 30 minutes every three days were allocated in the sub plots. The main results in this study can be summarized in the following points: 1-The drip irrigation with long-path emitters (Turbo) had been achieved the highest average values of root length (34.54 and 34.20 cm), root diameter (14.43 and 14.29 cm), sucrose percentage (20.77 and 20.71%), root yield (25.93 and 26.26 ton fed.-1), sugar yield (5.39 and 5.44 ton fed.-1), water productivity (18.74 and 18.84 kg root m-3 water consumptive use) and irrigation of water productivity (15.33 and 15.32 kg root m-3 applied water) during 2009/2010 and 2010/2011 growing seasons, respectively. 2-The highest average values of root yield (26.16 and 26.51 ton fed.-1), sugar yield (5.0 and 5.05 ton fed.-1), water productivity (17.56 and 17.64 kg root m-3 water consumptive use) and irrigation of water productivity (14.82 and 14.87 kg root m-3 applied water) had been obtained at irrigation sugar beet 20 minutes every two days in the 1st and 2nd seasons, respectively. 3-The highest average values of root yield (27.76 and 28.0 ton fed.-1) and sugar yield (5.81 and 5.85 ton fed.-1) were obtained with interaction between irrigation 20 minutes every two days and the Turbo emitter (long–path) in the 1st and 2nd seasons, respectively, while, the lowest average values of root yield (20.79 and 21.08 ton fed.-1) and sugar yield (3.70 and 3.73 ton fed.-1) had been obtained with irrigation 30 minutes every three days using the Metalic emitter (simple-orifice) in the same growing seasons, respectively. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| Sugar beet; Simple orifice; Built-in; long-path; drip irrigation; water productivity | ||||
| References | ||||
|
Abo-Shady, Kh. A.; Samia, M. M. Hilal; E. El.M. El-Sheref and M.F.M Ibrahim (2010). Yield and quality of crop as affected by irrigation interval, cultivars and potassium fertilization in Northdelta. J. Agric. Res. Kafer El-Sheikh Univ., 36(4): 361-376.
Adekalu, K.O. and D.A. Okunade (2006). Effect of irrigation amount and tillage system on yield and water use efficiency of cowpea. Communication in Soil Sci. and Plant Analysis, 37, 225-228.
Ali, M. H.; M. R. Hoque; A. A. Hassan and A. Khair (2007). Effects of deficit irrigation on yield, water productivity, and economic returns of wheat. Agricultural Water Management 92 (3): 151-161.
Allen, R. G.; L. S. Pereirs; D. Raes and M. Smith (1998). Crop evapotranspiration. Guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO irrigation and drainage, paper No. 56, FAO, Rome.
Ancuta Puscas, E. Luca and A. Ceclan (2007). The effect of the climate and soil conditions sugar beet yield increase and stabilization in Transylvania’s field conditions. Bulletin of University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca. Horticulture, Vol. 64, No. 1-2.
Baigy, M. J., F. G. Sahebi., I. Pourkhiz, A. Asgari and F. Ejlali (2012). Effect of deficit-irrigation management on components and yield of sugar beet. Intl. J. Agron. Plant. Prod. Vol., 3 (S), 781-787, 2012
Byan, Usrya A.; M.Z. El-Shinawy; Hosnia, M. Gomaa and M.H. Mahmoud (2002). Yield and water relation of cowpea and pea plants as affected by water regime. Arab. Univ. J. of Agric. Sci., 10 (3), ISSN 1110-2675. Chapman, H.D. and P.F. Pratt, (1961). Methods of analysis for soils, plants and waters. Univ. of California, USA. El-Maghraby, S.S.; M.A. Gomaa; I.F. Rehab and H.M.S. Hassan (2008). Response of sugar beet to some mechanical management practices, irrigation and plant densities. Sugar Tech. 10 (3): 219-226.
El-Nemr, M. K. (2010). Effect of operating pressure variation on uniformity parameters and its impact on crop productivity and power requirements of trickle irrigation. Misr J. of Agric. Eng. 27(4) : 1757-1770.
Ghadami Firouz Abadi A and M. Mirzaei, (2006). Effect of drip irrigation (tape) on the quantitative and qualitative characteristics of sugar beet, Journal of Research in Agronomy and Horticulture, No. 71, pp.11-6 .
Gomez, K.A and A. Gomez (1984). Statistical procedures for agricultural research. 1st ed. John Wiley Sons, New Yourk.
Hansen, U. W.; O. W. Israelsen and Q. E. Stringharm (1979). Irrigation Principles and Practices. 4th (ed.). John Willey and Sons.
Hassanli, A.M.; S. Ahmadirad and S. Beecham (2010). Evaluation of the influence of irrigation methods and water quality on sugar beet yield and water use efficiency. Agricultural Water Management, 97: 357-362.
Ibrahim, M. M.; M.R. Khalifa; M.A. Korieb; F.I. Zein and E.H. Omer (2002). Yield and quality of sugar beet crop as affected by mid to late season drought and potassium fertilization of North Nile Delta. Egypt. J. Soil Sci., 42(1): 87-102.
Isoda, A.; H. Konishi and P. Wang (2007). Effect of different irrigation methods on yield and water use efficiency of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris) in the arid area of China. Hort. Research Chiba University (Japan). 61: 7-10.
Kayombo, B., T.E. Simalenga, and N. Hatibu, (2002). Effect of tillage methods on soil physical condition and yield of beans in a sandy loam soil. Agricultural Mechanization in Africa, Asia and Latin America, 33(4):15-18.
Keller J. and D. Karmeli (1974). Trickle irrigation design parameters. ASAE, 17 (4): 678-684.
Klute, A. (1986). Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1. 2nd ed. ASA and SSSA. Madision. Wisconsin, USA.
Mc Ginnus, R.A. (1971). Sugar beet technology. 2nd ed. Sugar beet development foundation, Fot. Collinos., Colo, USA .
Richter, G.M., K.W. Jaggard, R.A.C. Mitchell, (2001). Modelling radiation interception and radiation useefficiency for sugar beet under variable climatic stress. Agric. For. Meteorol. 109, 13–25.
Rinaldi M. and A. Vonella, (2006). The response of autumn and spring sown sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) to irrigation in Southern Italy: Water and radiation use efficiency. Field Crops Res. 95(3): 103-114.
Rytter RM, (2005). Water use efficiency, carbon isotope discrimination and biomass production of two sugarbeet varieties under well-watered and dry conditions. Journal of Agronomy and crop science.191(13)426-438.
Sepaskhah, A.R. and A.A. Kamgar-Haghighi, (1997). Water use and yields of sugar beet grown under every-other furrow irrigation with different irrigation intervals. Agric. Water Manage. 34, 71–79.
Tognetti, R.; M. Palladino; A. Minnocci; S. Delfine and A. Alvino (2003). The response of sugar beet to drip and low pressure sprinkler irrigation in southern Italy. Agric. Water. Manage. 60: 135-155.
Waller, R.A. and D.B. Duncan. (1969). Symmetric multiple Comparison Problem Amer. Stat. Assoc. Jour. December, 1485-1503.Zagazig J. Agric. Res., 19: 595–606. | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 100 PDF Download: 164 |
||||
