RESPONSE OF ONION TO DIFFERENT LEVELS OF IRRIGATION WATER AND FERTILIZATION: (II) BIOMASS, YIELD, SIZE CLASSES, QUALITY, AND WATER USE
Hassan, A. (2013). RESPONSE OF ONION TO DIFFERENT LEVELS OF IRRIGATION WATER AND FERTILIZATION: (II) BIOMASS, YIELD, SIZE CLASSES, QUALITY, AND WATER USE. EKB Journal Management System, 30(3), 885-906. doi: 10.21608/mjae.2013.102032
Ahmed M. Hassan. "RESPONSE OF ONION TO DIFFERENT LEVELS OF IRRIGATION WATER AND FERTILIZATION: (II) BIOMASS, YIELD, SIZE CLASSES, QUALITY, AND WATER USE". EKB Journal Management System, 30, 3, 2013, 885-906. doi: 10.21608/mjae.2013.102032
Hassan, A. (2013). 'RESPONSE OF ONION TO DIFFERENT LEVELS OF IRRIGATION WATER AND FERTILIZATION: (II) BIOMASS, YIELD, SIZE CLASSES, QUALITY, AND WATER USE', EKB Journal Management System, 30(3), pp. 885-906. doi: 10.21608/mjae.2013.102032
Hassan, A. RESPONSE OF ONION TO DIFFERENT LEVELS OF IRRIGATION WATER AND FERTILIZATION: (II) BIOMASS, YIELD, SIZE CLASSES, QUALITY, AND WATER USE. EKB Journal Management System, 2013; 30(3): 885-906. doi: 10.21608/mjae.2013.102032

RESPONSE OF ONION TO DIFFERENT LEVELS OF IRRIGATION WATER AND FERTILIZATION: (II) BIOMASS, YIELD, SIZE CLASSES, QUALITY, AND WATER USE

Misr Journal of Agricultural Engineering
Article 17, Volume 30, Issue 3, July 2013, Page 885-906  XML PDF (1.04 MB)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/mjae.2013.102032
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Author
Ahmed M. Hassan
Assist. Prof., Ag. Eng. Dept., Faculty of Ag., Cairo Univ., Egypt.
Abstract
An experiment was conducted to study the effect of different levels of irrigation water and NPK fertilizers on bulb yield and quality of onion (Allium cepa L.).  Four levels of irrigation (65, 75, 85, and 100% of ETc) and four rates of NPK fertilizers (0, 50, 75, and 100% of the applied recommended rate of NPK) were arranged in a randomized complete block design, replicated three times. Onion yield, marketable yield, dry bulb yield, total dry biomass, WUEy of total yield, WUEm of marketable yield, WUEd of dry yield, TSS, N, P, and K were determined under trickle irrigation on a clay loam soil in 2011 and 2012. High yields were observed for the 100 and 85 % ETc with 100 and 75 % NPK treatments. The increase in applied water level significantly decreased the percentage of dry matter and total dry biomass in the onion bulb and the increase in NPK rates increased significantly the percentage of dry matter in the onion bulb in both years. There were no significant effect on WUEy and WUEm when decreasing the water level from 100% ETc to 85 % ETc and decreasing the NPK rate from 100 % to 75 %. The interaction between applied water levels and NPK application rates showed that the maximum significant increase in TSS, N, P, and K was with low water levels and higher levels of NPK rates in both 2011 and 2012 seasons. 
Keywords
trickle irrigation; deficit irrigation; onion; yield; water use efficiency; NPK fertilizer; quality parameters
References

AOAC, 2000. Official method 920.183 (b) Sugars (Reducing) in Honey/ I.S.I Hand book of Food Analysis (Part II) – 1984 page 36.

Bazza, M., 1994. Identification of wheat varieties suitable for arid and semi-arid conditions and of the characters for selection and breeding in regard to water-use efficiency. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands.

Bungard R. A.; A Wingler; J. D. Morton and M. Andrews. 1999. Ammonium can stimulate nitrate and nitrite reductase in the absence of nitrate in Clematis vitalba. Plant Cell Environ., 22: 859-866.

Camposeo, S. and P. Rubino. 2003. Effect of irrigation frequency on root water uptake in sugar beet. Plant Soil 253 (2), 301–309.

English, M. J.; J. T. Musick and V. V. N. Murty. 1990. Deficit irrigation. Management of Farm Irrigation Systems. ASAE Monograph, Michigan. pp. 631-663.

Enciso, J. M.; B. Wiedenfeld; J. Jifon and S. Nelson. 2009. Onion yield and quality response to two irrigation scheduling strategies. Scientia Horticulturae 120 (2009) 301–305.

Favati, F.; S. Lovelli; F. Galgano; V. Miccolis; T. Di Tommaso and V. Candido. 2009. Processing tomato quality as affected by irrigation scheduling. Sci. Hortic. 122, 562–571.

Geerts, S.; D. Raes; M. Garcia; J. Vacher; R. Mamani; J. Mendoza; R. Huanca; B. Morales; R. Miranda; J. Cusicanqui and C. Taboada. 2008. Introducing deficit irrigation to stablize yields of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Eur. J. Agron. 28: 427-436.

Girigowda, J. R.; N. C. Narasegowda and H. C. Krishna. 2005. Effect of fertilizer levels on uptake of primary nutrients and bulb yield of onion hybrids. Mysore J. Agric. Sci. 39(4): 557 – 560.

Gubb I.R, and M. S. H. Tavish. 2002. Onion preharvest and postharvest considerations. In: Rabinowitch HD, Currah L (eds.). Allim crop science. CABI publishing, UK. pp. 237-250.

Hanson, B.; D. May; R. Voss; M. Cantwell and R. Rice. 2003. Response of garlic to irrigation water. Agric. Water Manage. 58 (1), 29–43.

Hedge, D.M., 1986. Effect of irrigation regimes on dry matter production, yield, nutrient uptake and water use of onion. Ind. J. Agron. 31, 343 –348.

Imtiyaz, M.; N. P. Mgadla; B. Chepete and S. K. Manase. 2000. Response of six vegetable crops to irrigation schedules. Agric. Water Manage. 45 (3), 331 –342.

Jordan, J. E.; R. H. White; D.M. Victor; T.C. Hale; J.C. Thomas and M. C. Engelke. 2003. Effect of irrigation frequency on turf quality, shoot density, and root length density of five bentgrass cultivars. Crop Sci. 43 (1), 282–287.

Kirda, C., 2000. Deficit irrigation scheduling based on plant growth stages showing water stress tolerance. Deficit Irrigation Practices, FAO Water Reports, Rome 22.

Kumar, S.; M. Imtiyaz; A. Kumar and R. Singh. 2007. Response of onion (Allium cepa L.) to different levels of irrigation water. Agricultural Water Management 89: 161–166.

Lovelli, S.; M. Perniola; A. Ferrara and T. Di Tommaso. 2007. Yield  response factor to water (Ky) and water use efficiency of Carthamus tinctorius L. and Solanum melongena L. Agric. Water Manage. 92,  73–80.

Martin de Santa Olalla, F.J.; G. A. de Juan Valero and C. Fabeiro Corte`s. 1994. Growth and production of onion crop (Alium cepa L.) under different irrigation schedulings. Eur. J. Agron. 3 (1), 85 –92.

Nagaich, K. N.; S. K. Tridevi and Fajesh Lekhi. 1998. Effect of sulphur and potassium fertilization on onion (Allium cepa L.). South Indian Hort., 46(5 & 6): 266 – 271.

Ozbahce, A. and A. F. Tari. 2010. Effects of different emitter space and water stress on yield and quality of processing tomato under semi-arid climate conditions. Agric. Water Manage. 97, 1405–1410.

Samson, B. and K. Tilahun. 2007. Regulated deficit irrigation scheduling of onion in a semiarid region of Ethiopia. Agricultural Water Management. 89 (2007) 148–152.

Shock, C.C.; E.B.G. Feibert and L.D. Saunders. 2000. Irrigation criteria for drip-irrigated onions. HortScience 35:63–66.

Singh, J. and B. S. Dhankar. 1989. Effect of nitrogen, potash and zinc on storage of onion bulbs (Allium cepa). Veg. Sci., 18(1): 16 – 23.

Singh, R. B. and S. B. Singh. 2000. Significance of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium on onion (Allium cepa L.) raised from onion sets (Bulblets). Veg. Sci., 27(1): 88 – 89.

Singh, S.; P. K. Yadav and B. Singh. 2004. Effect of nitrogen and potassium on growth and yield of onion (Allium cepa L.) Cv. Pusa Red. Haryana J. Hort. Sci., 33(3 & 4): 308 – 309.

Steduto, P.; T. C. Hsiao; D. Raes and E. Fereres. 2009. Aqua Crop. The FAO Crop Model to Simulate Yield Response to Water: I. Concepts and Underlying Principles. Agron. J. 101: 426-437.

Vacchani, M. V. and Z. G. Patel. 1993. Effect of nitrogen phosphorus and potash on bulb yield and quality of onion (Allium cepa L.). Indian J. Agron., 32(2): 333 – 334.

Yadav, R. L.; N. L. Sen; M. S. Fageria and R. S. Dhaka. 2002. Effect of nitrogen and potassium fertilization on quality bulb production of onion. Haryana J. Hort. Sci. 31(3&4): 297-298.

Zwart, S. J. and W. G. M. Bastiaanssen. 2004. Review of measured crop water productivity values for irrigated wheat, rice, cotton and maize. Agric. Water Manage 69:115-133.

Statistics
Article View: 114
PDF Download: 198