EFFECT OF WATER IRRIGATION MANAGEMENT AND NITROGEN FERTILIZER SOURCES ON WATER PRODUCTIVITY AND QUALITY OF SOME EGYPTIAN COTTON CULTIVAR | ||||
| Misr Journal of Agricultural Engineering | ||||
| Article 4, Volume 37, Issue 3, July 2020, Page 297-312 PDF (378.89 K) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/mjae.2020.103161 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
M. M. EL-Sayed1; Y. A. M. Khalifa2; A. M. M. Elglaly  3
| ||||
| 1Assoc. Prof., Soil and Water Sci. Dept., Fac. of Ag., Al-Azhar U., Assiut, Egypt. | ||||
| 2Assoc. Prof., Agronomy. Dept., Fac. of Ag., Al-Azhar U., Assiut, Egypt. | ||||
| 3Lect., Fac. of Ag. Eng. (Assiut Branch), Al-Azhar U., Assiut, Egypt. | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| The experimental field was conducted at the experimental farm, Fac. of Ag., Al-Azhar U., Assuit, during two growing summer seasons of 2018 and 2019. A field experiment was designed as randomized complete block with split split-plot arrangement of treatment with three replications. The current study aims to evaluate different irrigation methods (conventional and alternative furrows) and nitrogen fertilizer Sources (urea as fast nitrogen fertilizer and ureaform as slow one) for maximizing the production of some cotton varieties (G80 and G90) as well as to define the most favorable irrigation manner that achieves the highest water productivity and high cotton yield and its quality. The results showed that alternate furrow irrigation (AFI) saves about 12 % of the actual evapotranspiration (ETa) compared to the conventional furrow irrigation (CFI). The ETa increased with urea fertilizer compared to ureaform fertilizer. The estimated evapotranspiration (ETo) values in both growing seasons followed the descending order of FAO Penman-Montithe > Turc > Hargreaves. It is clear that the Hargreaves equation calculated ETo efficiently for cotton crop growth under Assiut region circumstances. The AFI increased the crop water productivity (CWP) and irrigation water productivity (IWP) by 13 and 15%, respectively compared to the CFI. The irrigation methods during both growing seasons had significant effects on cotton seed yield, cotton lint percentage, boll weight, lint index, seed index, 2.5% span length, length uniformity ratio, fiber strength (pressly index) and fiber fineness. The AFI realized positive higher effect on cotton traits and yield quality than those under (CFI). | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| Evapotranspiration; water consumption; water productivity; quality of yield; cotton | ||||
| References | ||||
|
Abd El-Aal, A.S.A (2014). Effect of some plant densities patterns andnitrogen fertilizer rates on cotton yield, its components and fiberproperties for hybrid cotton 10229 X Giza 86 under early and latesowing. J. Plant Production, Mansoura Univ., 5 (7): 1239-1258.
Abdel-Maksoud, H.H., Sanaa A. Othman, and A.Y. El-Tawil. (2002). Improving water and N-use utilization for field crops via alternate furrow irrigation technique 1-Maize crop. Mansoura University Journal of Agricultural Sciences Mansoura University 27:8761- 8769.
Abdel-Salam, M.E. and M.A.M. El-Sayed Negm (2009). The Egyptian Cotton; current constraints and future opportunities. Textile Industries Holding Co., Modern Press- Alexandria-Egypt
Ahamd, R. N., M. Arshad and M.A. Shahid (2011). Raised Bed Technology for Crop Water Productivity of Maize and Cotton ICID 21st International Congress on Irrigation and Drainage, 15-23 October 2011, Tehran, Iran 171–180.
Ahmad, N., M. Arshad and M.A. Shahid. (2009). Bed-furrow system to replace conventional flood irrigation in Pakistan. Proceedings of 59th IEC Meeting and 20th ICID Conference held at New Dehli, India from December 6-11,.
Ali, M.H., M.R. Hoque, A.A. Hassa and A. Khair (2007). Effect of deficit irrigation on yield water productivity and economic returns of wheat. Agric. Water Manag. 92: 151-161.
Allen, R.G.; Pereira, L. S.; Raes, D. and Smith, M., (1998). Crop evapotranspiration: Guidelines for comparing crop water requirements. FAO Irrigation and drainage, Paper No.56. FAO, Rome, Italy. 300pp.
Attia, A.; N. Rajan; Sh.S. Nair; P.B. Delaune; Q. Xue; A.M.H. Ibrahim and D.B. Hays (2015). Modeling cotton lint yield and water use efficiency response to irrigation scheduling using cotton 2K. J. Crop Sci. Society of America. 108 (4): 1614-1623.
Chang, W.Z.; D.T. Sheng; Y.X. Ying and T.Q. Yun (2009). Effects of alternative furrow-irrigation on crop water consumption, yield and quality of cotton. Zhongguo Shengtai Nongye Xuebao / Chinese J. of Eco-Agric., 17 (1):13-17.
Dong, Zh.X.; Ch. Zhang; Y. Yang; L.H Hong; Y. Zhang and W. Zhang (2015). Water deficit alters cotton canopy structure and increases photosynthesis in the mid-canopy layer. Agron. J., 107 (5): 1947-1957.
El-Sayed M. M., A. I. El-Desoky, A. M. A. Abd El-Monem and M.A. Gameh (2014). Deficit irrigation and nitrogen fertilizers effects on crop production and environment hazardous of nitrate leaching in Upper Egypt. Int. j. Environ. 3(4): 245-255.
FAO (1998). Crop evapotranspiration: Guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO irrigation and drainage paper 56. Rome, Italy.
FAO (2009).Cropwat 8.0 for windows user guide. Rome, Italy.
FAO, Food and Agriculture Organisation (2016). Raised beds for improving crop water productivity and water efficiency in irrigated dryland agriculture, Egypt. Technologies and practices for small agricultural producers TECA. www. teca.fao.org.
Ghane, E., M. Feizi, B.M. Farid and E. Landi (2010). Water productivity of winter wheat in different irrigation planting methods using saline irrigation water Int. J. Agric. Bid. 11: 131-137.
Ibrahim, M.M. (2002). Effect of water supply on growth, yield and fiber properties of cotton plants growth under late sowing conditions. Ph. D. Thesis, Fac. of Agric., Al-Azhar Univ., Egypt.
Israelsen, O.W. and V.E. Hansen (1962). Irrigation principles and practices 3rd Edit. John Willey and Sons. Inc., New York.
Jensen, M. E., R. D. Burman and R. G.Allen, (1990). Evapotranspiration and irrigation water requirements. ASCE Manuals and Reports on Engineering Practices No. 70, Am. Sco. Civil Engrs. New York, NY, 360pp.
Klute, A. (1986). Methods of soil analysis, Part 1: Physical and Mineralogical Methods (2nd) Ed American Soci. of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Lal, D., B. Clark, T. Bettner, B. Thoreson and R. L. Snyder (2012). Rice evapotranspiration estimates and crop coefficients in Glenn- Colusa irrigation district, Sacramento Valley, California.” Proc., USCID Water Management Conf., USCID, Denver.
Ling, L.P. and ZH.F. Cang (2011). Effect of regulation of water and nitrogen on cotton yield and water use efficiency under different furrow irrigation patterns. J. Cotton Sci., 23 (1): 28-33.
Linquist, B., R. Snyder, F. Anderson, L. Espino, G. Inglese, S. Marras, R. Moratie, R.Mutters, P.Nicolosi, H. Rejmanek, A. Russo, T. Shapland, Z. Song, A. Swelam, G.Tindula and J. Hill, (2015). Water balances and evapotranspiration in water and dry seeded rice systems. Irrig. Sci, 33, 375–385.
Munir, M.K.; M. Tahir; M.F. Saleem and M. Yaseen (2015). Growth, yield and earliness response of cotton to row spacing and nitrogen management. J. Anim. Plant Sci. 25(3): 729-738.
Naresh, R.K., B. Singh, S.P. Singh, P.K. Singh, A. Kumar and A. Kumar (2012). Furrow Irrigated Raised Bed (FIRB) Planting Technique for Diversification of Rice-Wheat System for Western IGP Region., Int. J. Life Sc. Bt & Pharm. Res.1(3): 134–141.
Page, A.L. (Ed.) (1982). Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1: Physical properties and part 2: Chemical and microbiological properties. (3nded.) Amer. Soc. Agron., In Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Phillip, M.C.; Craswell, E.C.; Polidoro, J.C.; Chen, D.L(2015). Fate of efficiency of 15N-labelled slow-and controlled-release fertilizers. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst., 102, 167–178.
Qureshi ,S.A.; C.A. Madramootoo and G.T. Dodds (2002). Evaluation of irrigation schemes for sugarcane in Sindh, Pakistan , using SWAP93. Agric.Water Manage. 54: 37-48.
Reddi, G.H.S and T.Y. Reddy (2009). Efficient Use of Irrigation Water. 1st ed. Kalyani Publishers, New Delhi. pp. 110-112.
Sander, J.Z. and W.G.M. Bastianssen (2004). Review of measured crop water productivity values for irrigated wheat, rice, cotton and maize. Agric. Water Manage. 69 (2): 115–133.
Sarker, K.K., M. Akanda, R. Biswas, S.K Roy, D.K. Khatun, and M. Goffa. (2016). Field performance of alternate wetting and drying furrow irrigation on tomato crop growth, yield, water use efficiency, quality and profitability. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 15(10), 2380–2392.
Sepaskhah, A.R., and M.H. Khajehabdollahi (2005). Alternate furrow irrigation with different irrigation intervals for maize (Zea mays L.) Plant Production Science 8:592-600.
Sepaskhah, A.R. and S.N. Hosseini (2008). Effects of alternate furrow irrigation and nitrogen application rates on yield and water- and nitrogen-use efficiency of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant Prod. Sci. 11 (2): 250–259.
Sheng, D.T.; K.Sh. Zhong; W.Zh. Chang; W. Feng; Y.X. Ying and S.X. Li (2007). Responses of cotton growth, yield, and water use efficiency to alternate furrow irrigation. J. Acta Agron. Sinica, 33 (12):1982-1990.
Tafteh ,A. and A. R. Sepaskhah (2012). Application of HYDRUS-1D model for simulating water and nitrate leaching from continuous and alternate furrow irrigated rapeseed and maize fields. Agric. Water Manage. 113: 19-29.
Thind, H. S.; G. S. Buttar and M. S. Aujla (2010). Yield and water use efficiency of wheat and cotton under alternate furrow and check-basin irrigation with canal and tube well water in Punjab, India Irrig. Sci., 28: 489– 496.
Yang, C.J.; Y. Luo; L. Sun and N. Wu (2015). Effect of deficit irrigation on the growth, water use characteristics and yield of cotton in arid Northwest China. Pedosphere. 25 (6): 910-924. | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 376 PDF Download: 365 |
||||
