COMPARISON OF TWO METHODS FOR MEASURING PYRETHROID HYDROLYZING ESTERASES: EXTRACTION SELECTIVITY AND RADIOLABELED IDENTITY | ||||
| Bulletin of Pharmaceutical Sciences Assiut University | ||||
| Article 11, Volume 4, Issue 1, 1981, Page 151-162 PDF (438.85 K) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/bfsa.1981.104595 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
| Yehia A. I. Abdel-Aal1; David M. Soderlund2 | ||||
| 1Department of Plant Protection, College of Agriculture, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt | ||||
| 2NYSAES Department of Entomology, Geneva, N.Y. 14456 | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| Two published methods are used widely for measuring pyrethxoid hydrolyzing esterases. These two methods are based on measuring either the acid production (Jao and Casida, 1974) or the residual unhydrolyzed ester (Suzuki and Miyamoto, 1978). These methods were compared using (IRS, tirans), permethrin, labeled at the carbonyl carbon of the acid moiety, and rat liver microsomes. No consistent results were obtained and the enzyme activity determined by the first method was lower than that of the second one. The selectivity of the extract-ion procedure in method I and the identity of the labeled product were examined by TLC chromatography. Chloroform extract in acid production method contained more than 30% of the total acid released, thereby, introducing a large error in quantitation. Alkalinization of the reaction mixture prior to chloroform extraction using 1 ml buffer, pH 10, changed the extraction selectivity of acid permethrin (DCVA) in favour of the aqueous phase and consequently increased the accuracy of this method. No chemical hydrolysis of (IRS, trans) permethrin could be detected under conditions of pH 10 over 60 minute period. | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 62 PDF Download: 114 |
||||
