PHYSICAL AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF GARLIC RELATING RUBBING AND PLANTING MACHINES | ||||
| Misr Journal of Agricultural Engineering | ||||
| Article 2, Volume 28, Issue 3, July 2011, Page 571-588 PDF (756.4 K) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/mjae.2011.104866 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Author | ||||
| A. M. Dress | ||||
| Assist. Prof., Ag. Eng. Dept., Fac. of Ag., Al-Azhar U., Assiut, Egypt. | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| This study was conducted to investigate physical, mechanical and chemical properties of Garlic white (Allium sativum L.) for bulb and clove. The considered parameters were length, width, thickness, mass , volume, solid density, bulk density, porosity, Arithmetic mean diameter, Geometric mean diameter, sphericity, packaging coefficient, Surface area, projected area, coefficient of static friction with different surfaces (wood , glass, rubber, steel, fiber, plastic), angle of repose (empty , filling), rubbing force and rupture force. The average values of properties, measured at a moisture content of 12.97 ± 0.30% (dry basis): for garlic bulb, length, width, thickness, mass , volume, solid density, bulk density, porosity, arithmetic mean diameter, geometric mean diameter, sphericity, packaging coefficient, surface area and projected area, were 59.9 mm, 58 mm, 45.2 mm, 62.5 g, and 103.5 cm3, 0.61 g/cm3 , 0.45 g/cm3, 25.9 %, 54.4 mm, 53.85 mm, 0.90, 0.97, 91.4 cm2 and (50.05/42.27) cm2 respectively. The same value for garlic clove were 26.4 mm, 11.9 mm, 8.5 mm, 1.49 g, and 4.39 cm3, 0.94 g/cm3 , 0.57 g/cm3, 39.6 %, 15.6 mm, 13.7 mm, 0.53, 0.46, 6.1 cm2 and (2.66/0.5) cm2 respectively. The coefficient of static friction of bulb and clove on various surfaces showed that static friction on rubber is higher then on other surfaces and static friction on fiber is the lowest. Angle of repose of bulb and clove were higher when applying the filling method than when applying the empting method. It was also noticed that angle of repose of clove for both methods was higher than for bulb. The rubbing force ranged from 8.99 to 14.5 kg. While the rupture force of the clove ranged from 2.5 to 13.54 kg. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| Garlic; Physical properties; Mechanical properties; Coefficient of friction; Angle of repose; Rubbing force and Rupture force | ||||
| References | ||||
|
Ahmad, J. I. 1996. Garlic-apanacea for health and good taste. Nutrition and Food Sc. 96(1): 32-35.
Altuntaº, E. ; E. Özgöz; and Ö.F. Taser. 2005. Some physical properties of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graceum L.) seeds. J. Food Eng., 71, 37-43.
ASAE. 1999. Moisture measurement - unground grain and seeds. ASAE S352.2 DEC97. In ASAE Standards 1999, 567. St. Joseph, MI: ASAE.
Bahnasawy, A. H. 2007. Some physical and mechanical properties of garlic. Int. J. Food Eng. 3, 1–18.
Chandrasekar,V. and R. Viswanathan. 1999.Physical and thermal properties of coffee. J. Agric. Eng. Res.73:227-234.
Gupta, R. K. and S. K. Das. 1997. Physical proerties of sunflower seeds. J. Agric. Eng. Res. 66:1-8.
Ibrahim M. M. 2008. Determination of dynamic coefficient of friction for some materials for feed pellet under different values of pressure and temperature. Misr J. Ag. Eng., 25(4):1389-1409.
Joshi, D.C.; S.K. Das; R.K. Mukherjee. 1993. Physical properties of pumpkin seeds. Agric. Eng. 54: 219–229.
Kaleem, F.H.; Z.E. Ismail and G. R. AbdHakim.(1993).Factors affecting grain cleaning efficiency.(part 1): Grain straw mixture and blower characteristics.Misr J. Ag. Eng.10(2):369-382.
Karababa, E. 2006. Physical properties of popcorn kernels. J. Food Eng., 72, 100-107.
Konak, M.; K. Carman and C. Aydin. 2002. Physical properties of chick pea seeds. Biosys. Eng. 82(1): 73-78.
Madamba, P. S.; R. H. Driscoll and K. A. Buckle. 1993. Bulk density, porosity and resistance to airflow of garlic slices. Drying Tech. 11(7): 1837-1854.
Madamba, P. S.; R. H. Driscoll and K. A. Buckle. 1994. Shrinkage, density and porosity of garlic during drying. J. Food Eng. 23:309-319.
Marijana, J. 1996. Effects of the size of planting material and soil preparation on the yield of garlic (ALLIUM SATIVUM L.). Res. Reports Biotec. Fac. Jamnikarjeva, Slovenia. Univ.Ljubljana. 67: 203-207.
Matlob, A. N. and A. M. Khalel. 1986. Effect of planting dates, plant spacing and clove size on vegetative growth and bulbing of garlic (ALLIUM SATIVUM L.). Iraqi J. Agric. Sc. zanco 4(3): 35-50.
Mohsenin, N. N. 1986. Physical Properties of Plant and Animal Materials, 2nd ed. Gordon and Breach Sc. Publishers
Nourai, A. H. 1994. Effect of planting methods and seed rates on yield, yield components and quality of garlic (ALLIUM SATIVUM L.) in the Sudan. Acta hort. 358: 359-364.
Olajide, J.O. and I. O. Ade-Omowaye. 1999. Some physical properties of locust beem seed. J.Agric. Eng. Res.74:213-215.
Olaniyan, A. and K. Oje. 2002. Some aspects of the mechanical properties of shea nut. Biosys. Eng. 4: 413–420.
Olaoye, J. O. 2000. Some physical properties of castor nut relevant to design of processing equipment. J. Agric. Eng. Res. 77(1): 113-118.
Schaper, A. L. and E.C. Yaeger. 1992. Coefficients of friction of Irish potatoes. Trans ASEA 35(5): 1647-1651.
Schlumberger, S. 2008. Building a Hele-Shaw cell-experiment, http://www.seed.slb.com/en/scictr/lab/heleshaw/largecell.htm (accessed on 21 August 2008).
Song, H. and Litchfield, J. B. 1991. Predicting method of terminal velocity for grains. ASAS. 34 (1): 225 – 230.
Tabil, G. L.; H. Qi; K. K. Chawla; J. Kienholz; V. Crossman and R. White. 1999. Physical properties of selected special crops grown in Alberta. ASAE/CSAE annual international meeting. Paper No. 996049.
Topuz, A.; M. Topakci; M. Canakci; I. Akinci; and F., Ozdemir. 2005. Physical and nutritional properties of four orange varieties. J. Food Eng. Res., 66: 519-523.
Zhang, Q.; M. G. Britton and R. J. Kieper. 1994. Interactions between wheat and a corrugated steel surface. Trans. ASAE 37(3): 951-956. | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 164 PDF Download: 818 |
||||
