EFFECT OF OPERATING PRESSURE VARIATION ON UNIFORMITY PARAMETERS AND ITS IMPACT ON CROP PRODUCTIVITY AND POWER REQUIREMENTS OF TRICKLE IRRIGATION | ||||
| Misr Journal of Agricultural Engineering | ||||
| Article 46, Volume 27, Issue 4, October 2010, Page 1757-1770 PDF (704.88 K) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/mjae.2010.105343 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Author | ||||
| M.K. El-Nemr | ||||
| Assistant professor, Department of Agricultural Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Kafrelsheikh University, Egypt. | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| A field experiment was carried out in Al-Shahwan farms, Khatatba village, Sadat city, Menoufia governorate under sandy soil conditions with cucumber crop (F1-Faris). Uniformity parameters including emission uniformity, uniformity coefficient, distribution uniformity, manufacturing coefficient of variation, and emitter flow rate variation were measured for three types of emitters G, M, and T under 6, 8, 10, and 12m of water operating pressure head, in order to recommend an operating pressure head, that gives the best uniformity parameters which will be reflected on crop productivity. The power requirements for all treatments were calculated per unit area. The results showed that, better uniformity parameters will give better productivity. It is recommended to use 12m head for both M and T emitters, and 10m for G type. The T type gave the maximum crop productivity which reached 6.66 Mg/fed under 12m operating head. Increasing uniformity parameters led to increase the benefits of water unit as a result of increasing crop productivity.M type needed less power than the two other types but this affected the crop productivity. The maximum productivity gained under T emitter with 12m operating pressure head, compared with the maximum productivity of the other two types gave an increase of 6.7% and 12.5% compared to G and M types respectively. This will be faced by an increase of 63.8% of power requirement compared to M type, and a shortage of 6.9% of power requirement compared to G type. Increase of 6.7% of crop productivity and 12.5% for T type compared to the G and M types gave an increase in power source costs about 1.4% and 0.12%, respectively compared to the other two types. Electric power will save 63.6% of diesel fuel costs. | ||||
| References | ||||
|
American Society of Agricultural engineers, 1985. ASAE Engineering practice, ASAE EP405, St. Joseph, Mi. Bralts, V.F. 1986. Operational principles (C.F. Nakayama, F.S. and D.A.Bucks ,1986. Trickle irrigation for crop production Design, Operation and Management.U.S.Department of Agriculture, Agricultural research service, U.S.Water Conservation Laboratory, Phoenix, Arizona, U.S.A.pp.216-240). Bralts, V. F.; I. Wu and H. M. Gitlin. 1981a. Manufacturing variation in drip irrigation uniformity. Transactions of theASAE 24(1):113-119.
Bralts, V. F.; I. Wu and H. M. Gitlin. 1981b. Drip irrigation uniformity considering emitter plugging. Transactions of the ASAE 24(5):1234-1240.
Christiansen, J. E. 1942. Hydraulics of sprinkling systems for irrigation. Trans. Amer. Soc. Civ. Eng. 107:221-239.
Culpin, C.1976. Farm Machinery, Ninth edition, Crosby lockwood staples, London.
FAO. 1980. Irrigation and drainage paper 36.Localized irrigation. Rome.
FAO. 1992. CROPWAT.”a computer program for irrigation planning and management”. Irrigation and Drainage No.46.Rome.
Hazen, A. and G.S.Williams. 1920. Hydraulic Tables (3rd ed.), New York: John Wiley and Sons.
James, L.G. 1988. Principles of farm irrigation system design. John willey & sons, Inc.
Jensen, M.E. 1983. Design and operation of farm irrigation systems. ASAE, Michigan, USA.p827.
Karmeli, D. and J, Keller. 1975.Trickle irrigation design .Rain Bird sprinkler manufacturing crop.Glendora, California, pp133. Keller, J. and D. Karmeli. 1974. Trickle irrigation design parameters. Trans Amer.Soc.Agric.Eng.17 (4):678-684. Kruse, E. G. 1978. Describing irrigation efficiency and uniformity.J. Irrig. Drain. Div. ASCE 104(IR):35-41.
Merriam, J.L. and J. Keller. 1978. Farm irrigation system evaluation: A guide for management. Agric and Irrig. Eng. Dept., Utah state University, Logan, Utah, pp 271.
Mizyed, N. and E.G. Kruse. 2008. Emitter discharge variability of subsurface drip irrigation in uniform soils: Effect on water-application uniformity. Trans. ASAE, 26: 451-458.
Nakayama, F. S. and D. A. Bucks. 1986. Trickle Irrigation for Crop Production — Design, Operation and Management, Developments in Agricultural Engineering 9. New York, N.Y.:Elsevier.
Solomon, K. H. 1984. Yield related interpretations of irrigation niformity and efficiency measures. Irrig. Sci. 5:161-172.
Wu, I.P. and H.M. Gitlin. 1975.Energy gradient line for drip irrigation laterals. J.Irrig. and Drain. Div., Amer.Soc.Civil Eng.101(IR4):321-326. Wu, I. P.; T. A. Howell and E. A. Hiler. 1979. Hydraulic design of drip irrigation systems. Hawaii Agric. Exp. Sta. Tech. Bull.105. Honolulu, Hawaii: Univ. of Hawaii.
المراجع العربیة الجندی،ع.م.؛أ.أ.عبد العزیز و ع.أ.سلیمان.2001. تصمیم شبکات الرى والصرف.جامعة عین شمس.جمهوریة مصر العربیة. | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 113 PDF Download: 202 |
||||
