USING IN SITU HYPERSPECTRAL MEASUREMENTS AND HIGH RESOLUTION SATELLITE IMAGERY TO DETECT STRESS IN WHEAT IN EGYPT | ||||
| Misr Journal of Agricultural Engineering | ||||
| Article 49, Volume 27, Issue 4, October 2010, Page 1811-1822 PDF (582.92 K) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/mjae.2010.105351 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
| A.H Elmetwalli1; A.A. Derbala2; T.Z. Fouda3 | ||||
| 1Lec. of Agric. Eng.Dept., Fac. of Agric., Tanta U., Egypt. | ||||
| 2Assoc. Prof. of Agric. Eng.Dept., Fac. of Agric., Tanta U., Egypt. | ||||
| 3Prof., and Head of Agric. Eng.Dept., Fac. of Agric., Tanta U., Egypt. | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| Mapping and detecting stress at both local and regional scales are very important in site specific management. Launching the first generation of high spatial and spectral resolution remote sensing satellite at the beginning of the 21st century provides the opportunity to have better understanding of crop stress and the extent of stress in a specific environment. This work was carried out to assess the ability of hyperspectral and high spatial resolution remote sensing imagery to detect stress in wheat in the Nile Delta of Egypt. A field work visit was undertaken during winter season of 2007 in March (5-30: wheat) to collect ground reference data including soil samples, vegetation samples, water samples, chlorophyll estimates, reflectance measurements and GPS coordinates. The work visit was timed to coincide with the acquisition of QuickBird satellite imagery (7 April, 2007). The results further showed that the QuickBird image successfully detected stress within field and local scales, and therefore can be a robust tool in identifying issues of crop management at a local scale. a strong linear relation between RVI derived from in situ and RVI derived from satellite data (R = 0.75; p = 0.000). The results further showed that MLC is an effective classification algorithm for differentiating different crops within the study area. | ||||
| References | ||||
|
Aparicio, N., Villegas, D., Araus, J. L., Casadesus, J. and Royo, C. (2002). Relationship between growth traits and spectral vegetation indices in durum wheat. Crop Science 42: 1547-1555. Bannari, A., Khurshid, K. S., Staenz, K. and Schwarz, J. (2008). Potential of Hyperion EO-1 hyperspectral data for wheat crop chlorophyll content estimation. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing 34: 139-157. Crippen, E. R. (1990). Calculating the vegetation index faster. Remote Sensing of Environment 34: 71-73. Huete, A. R. (1988). A Soil-Adjusted Vegetation Index (SAVI), Remote Sensing of Environment 25: 295-309. Jiang, Y., Carrow, R. N. and Duncan, R. R. (2003). Correlation analysis procedures for canopy spectral reflectance data of Seashore Paspalum under Traffic stress. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 13: 187-208. Lymburner, L., Beggs, P. J. and Jacobson, C. R. (2000). Estimation of canopy-average surface-specific leaf area using Landsat TM data. Photogrametric Engineering & Remote Sensing 66:183-191. Moran, M. S. (2000). New imaging sensor technologies suitable for agricultural management. Aspects of Applied Biology, 60. Remote Sensing in Agriculture, 1-10. Pearson, R. L. and Miller, L. D. (1972). Remote mapping of standing crop biomass for estimation of the productivity of the shortgrass prairie, Pawnee National Grassland, Colorado. In: proceeding of the 8th international symposium on Remote Sensing of Environment, ERIM International (pp. 1357-1381) (Ann Arbor, MI, USA) Reujean, J. and Breon, F. (1995). Estimating PAR absorbed by vegetation from bidirectional from reflectance measurements. Remote Sensing of Environment 51: 375-384. Rondeaux, G., Steven, M. and Baret, F. (1996). Optimization of soil-adjusted vegetation indices. Remote Sensing of Environment 55: 95-107. Rouse, J. W., Haas, Jr. R. H., Deering, D. W., Schell, J. A. and Harlan, J. C. (1974). Monitoring the vernal advancement and retro gradation (green wave effect) of natural vegetation; NASA/GSFC Type III final report, Greenbelt, MD. pp 371. Tucker, C. J. (1979). Red and Photographic infrared linear combination for monitoring vegetation. Remote Sensing of Environment 8: 127-150. Tyler, A. N., Svab, E., Preston, T., Presing, M. and Kovacs, W. A. (2006). Remote Sensing of the water quality of shallow lakes: A mixture modelling approach to quantifying phytoplankton in water characterized by high-suspended sediment. International Journal of Remote Sensing 27(8): 1521-1537. Vina, A. (2003). Remote detection of Biophysical Properties of Plant Canopies.[Online]:http://calamps.unl.edu/snrscoq/SNRS_Colloquium_2002_Andres_Vina.ppt. Wu, J., Wang, D. and Bauer, M. E. (2007b). Assessing broadband vegetation indices and QuickBird data in estimating leaf area index of corn and potato canopies. Field Crops Research 102: 33-42. Wu, J., Wang, D., Rosen, C. J. and Bauer, M. B. (2007a). Comparison of petiole nitrate concentration, SPAD chlorophyll readings, and QuickBird satellite imagery in detecting nitrogen status of potato canopies. Field Crops Research 101: 96-103. Yang, C., Everitt, J. H. and Bradford, J. M. (2006a). Comparisons of QuickBird satellite imagery and airborne imagery for mapping grain sorghum yield patterns. Precision Agriculture 7: 33-44. Yang, C., Everitt, J. H. and Bradford, J. M. (2006b). Evaluating high-resolution QuickBird satellite imagery for estimating cotton yield. Transactions of the ASABE 49 (5): 1599-1606. | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 120 PDF Download: 195 |
||||
