Marginal Bone Loss Around Machined versus Plasma Sprayed Implant Supported Mandibular Overdenture Cases -A Split- Mouth Randomized Controlled Trial. | ||||
| Egyptian Dental Journal | ||||
| Article 17, Volume 66, Issue 3 - July (Fixed Prosthodontics, Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Materials), July 2020, Page 1797-1805 PDF (2.35 MB) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/edj.2020.32941.1144 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Author | ||||
maha kamal  
| ||||
| Lecturer of removable prosthodontic department, faculty of dentistry, British University in Egypt. | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| Abstract Aim of this study: To compare marginal bone loss around machined and plasma sprayed dental implant collar surfaces after 24 months follow up period in mandibular overdenture cases. Materials and methods: Eight patients with completely edentulous ridges received 32 implants; each patient received 4 implants at the lower arch; 2 machined collar implants were placed at one side and 2 plasma sprayed collar implants were placed at the other side. The implants were loaded 3 months after placement. Radiographic marginal bone loss was measured using CBCT at time of implant placement (baseline), 3,6,12 and 24 months follow up periods. Result: Marginal bone loss was observed for both machined and plasma sprayed implant collars throughout the follow up periods with statistically significant decrease in bone level through 24 months follow up period. Conclusion: Plasma sprayed implant collar promoted better bone repair with less bone loss than did machined implant collar. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| Key words: Machined implant surface; plasma sprayed implant; marginal bone loss around implant; implant supported overdenture | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 164 PDF Download: 400 |
||||
