CALIBRATION OF THREE COMMON FLOW MEASUREMENT DEVICES FOR OPEN CHANNELS | ||||
| Misr Journal of Agricultural Engineering | ||||
| Article 10, Volume 27, Issue 1, January 2010, Page 151-169 PDF (774.83 K) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/mjae.2010.107153 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
| M.Y. El-Ansary1; M.A. Awad2; A.A. Nassar3; A.A. Farag4 | ||||
| 1Prof. Emt.; Ag. Eng. Dept., Fac. Ag., Benha U., Egypt. | ||||
| 2Assoc. Prof.; Ag. Eng. Dept., Fac. Ag., Benha U., Egypt. | ||||
| 3Assoc.Prof. Water Mang. And Irrig. Sy. Res. Ins., WMISRI , MWRI., Egypt. | ||||
| 4Teaching Assist., Ag. Eng. Dept., Fac. Ag., Benha U., Egypt. | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| The aim of this research was to test and calibrate some water flow measurement devices, which were appropriate for on-farm management in Egypt. To fulfill this purpose, three of the common water- flow measurement devices (v-notch, rectangular weir and cutthroat flume) were calibrated in the Laboratory of Hydraulics Research Institute in Qanater City (Egypt, القناطر). The calibration was carried out using an ultrasonic flow- meter. Results of this study showed that under low discharges, i.e. 5 and 10 Ls-1, the most accurate device was the v-notch, under high discharges 15, 20, 25, 30 and 35 L s-1, the most accurate one was the rectangular weir. Increasing discharge rate from 5 to 35 L s-1 resulted in increases in error percentage in the readings of the v-notch. On the other hand, the corresponding error percentages in readings of both the rectangular weir and the cutthroat flume were obviously decreased. The decreases seemed inversely related to the increase in rate of discharge. Effect of time interval on error percentage seemed to be irregular. From the aforementioned results, it could be deduced that the v-notch weir is preferable for measuring the discharge at a rate ranging from 5 to 10 L s-1, beyond which the rectangular weir, as well as the cutthroat flume, would be preferable. | ||||
| References | ||||
|
ASTM, (2003) D5640: Standard guide for selection of weirs and flumes for open-channel flow measurement of water. Ann. Bk. of ASTM standards, Vol. 11.02, http://www.techstreet.com/cgi-bin/
Bos, M.G., Replogle, J.A. and Clemmens, A.J. (1985): Open channel flow measurement: 141 pp., http//.www.leeds.ac.uk
Cuttle, S.P. and Mason, D.J. (1987): A flow-proportional water sampler for use in conjunction with a v-notch weir in small catchment studies. Agric. Water 13:93-99.
Farag, A. A. (2007): Evaluation of water flow measurement methods appropriate for on-farm management in Egypt Dept. Agri. Eng. Fac. Ag. Benha U., Egypt.
Kulin, G., and P.R. Compton (1975): "A guide to methods and standards for the measurement of water flow." Nat. Bur. of standards, spec. publ.: 421.
LMNO Engineering, (2001): The fluid flow calculations website. http//www.LMNOengeneering.com
Pugh, C. A. (2001): Using reclamation's new "Water measurement manual" to save water. U.S. Dep. of the Interior, Bureau of Recl., Denver, Colorado. www.usbr.gov
Replogle, J. A. (1998): Measuring flows in earthen canals and irrigation wells. Issue of Irrigation J.: http://www.greenmediaonline.com/ij/1998/0398/0398mf.html
Replogle, J.A. (1971): Critical-depth flumes for determining flow in canals and natural channels. Trans. ASAE No. 70-215: 428-433.
Replogle, J. A. and Clemmens, A. J. (1979): Broad-Crested weirs for portable flow metering. Transactions of the ASAE, pp. 1324-1328.
Swamee, B. K. S. (1988): Rectangular weir equation. A.S.C.E. Vol.114, No. 8, pp. 945-949.
USBR, (2001): Water measurement manual. U.S.D of Interior, Bur. of Recl. 3rd. ed. Available from http://www.ntis.gov
Walker, W.R. (1989): Guidelines for designing and evaluating surface irrigation systems. FAO irrigation and drainage paper 45. | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 182 PDF Download: 337 |
||||
