RESPONSE OF COWPEA TO WATER DEFICIT UNDER SEMI-PORTABLE SPRINKLER IRRIGATION SYSTEM | ||||
| Misr Journal of Agricultural Engineering | ||||
| Article 11, Volume 27, Issue 1, January 2010, Page 170-190 PDF (582.65 K) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/mjae.2010.107154 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Author | ||||
| M. A. Aboamera, | ||||
| Associate Prof., Agric.Eng.Dept, .Fac. of Agric., Minufiya University, Egypt. | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata, (L.)Walp.) was subjected to water application deficit through a semi-portable sprinkler irrigation system. The experiment was conducted under three levels of water application deficit which were: fully irrigation (with 100% of soil moisture content at field capacity), 80%, and 60% of soil moisture content at field capacity. For all levels of water deficit, the highest percentage of water application depth (31.02%), occurred during mid - season stage. The higher crop evapotranspiration (Etc) value was (6.94 mm. d-1) observed after 35 days from planting with fully irrigation. At 100% of soil moisture content at field capacity, the average value of crop coefficient (Kc) was 0.696, 0.615, 0.673 and 0.60 for initial, development, mid – season, and harvesting stage respectively. The average values of water stress coefficient (Ks) in development and harvesting stages illustrated that the crop extract from root zone without suffering water stress in the readily available water because of the root zone depletion was smaller than the radial available water in root zone. The highest seed yield (1.12 Mg/feddan) was observed with fully irrigation, while the lowest (0.67 Mg/feddan) was with 60% of field capacity. This lowest value of seed yield was associated with low number of pods/plant (14.6 pods /plant) and small increase in number of seeds per pod (11.00 seeds/pod) and average seed weight (20 g/plant). Increasing the deficit percent of water application resulted in progressively lower water use efficiency. At 80 % of field capacity, water use efficiency was 0.68 kg/m3 while, it decreased to 0.59 kg/m3 as the deficit percent increased from 80% to 60% of soil moisture content at field capacity. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| water deficit on cowpea; portable sprinkler irrigation system; actual cowpea evapotranspiration; yield and water use efficiency under deficit irrigation | ||||
| References | ||||
|
Abou-Kheira, A.A. 2009. Micromanagement of deficit – irrigated peanut with sprinkler irrigation. Agric. Water Manage, 9 (2009)1409 – 1420.
Andrade, C. L.T., Silva, A.A.G., Souza, I.R.P., Conceicao, M.A.F., 1993.Crop coefficients and irrigation coefficients for cowpea. EMPRAPA – CNPAI, Teresina, 6 pp. Comunicado tecnico, 9 (in Portuguese with abstract in English).
Detar, W.R., 2009. Crop coefficient and water use foe cowpea in the San Joaquin Valley of California.Agric.Water Manage., 96, 53 – 66.
Doorenbos, J. and A.H.Kassam., 1979.Yield response to water. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 33, Rome, Italy, 193 pp
Farahani, H.Oweis, T. and G. zzi, 2008. Crop coefficient for drip -irrigated cotton in Mediterranean environment. Irrig. Sci. 26, 375 – 383.
Grema, A. K. and T. M. Hess., 1994. Water balance and water use of pearl millet – cowpea intercrops in north east Nigeria. Agric. Water Manage, 26 (1994) 169 - 185.
Hsiao, T.C., and E. Acevedo. 1974. Plant response to water deficits, water use efficiency, and drought resistance. Agric. Meteorology. 14: 59 – 84.
Jensen, M. E., 1973.Consumptive use of water and irrigation water requirements. ASCE, P.215.
Maas, E.V. and J.A. Poss., 1989. Salt sensitivity of cowpea at various growth stages. Irrig. Sci., 10:313 – 320.
Nautiyal, P.C., and Y.C.Yoshi,2000. Deficit irrigation practice. FAO Water reports. No.22, Rome, Italy, 102 pp.
Ong, C.K., 1984. The influence of temperature and water deficits on the partitioning of dry matter in groundnut (Archis hypogaea L.). J.Exp.Bot.35, 746 - 755
Plaut, Z., and M.Ben – Hur, .2005. Irrigation management of peanut with a moving sprinkler system: Runoff, Yield, and Water use efficiency, Agro. J., 97, 1202 – 1209.
Richard, G., Lauis, S., Dirk, R., and S.Martin (2000). Crop evapotranspiration (guidelines for computing crop water requirements). ETc under soil water stress conditions, Chapter 8, FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56, Rome, Italy, 161pp
Shouse, Peter, Samuel, desberg, W.A. Jury, and L.H. Stolzy., 1981. Water deficit effects on water potential, yield and water use of cowpeas. Agro. J, Vol. 73, March – April, 1981: 333 - 336.
Souza, M.S.M., Bizerra, F.M.L.,and E.M.Teofilo, 2005.Crop coefficients for cowpea in the coastal region of the state of ceara (Brazil). Irrig. Botucatu 10 (3), 241 – 248 (in Portuguese with abstract in English).
Zesika, L. H. and A. E. Hall., 1982. Seed yields and water use cowpea (Vigna unguiculata, (L.)Walp) subjected to planned – water deficit irrigation. Irrig. Sci., 3: 237 - 245. | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 176 PDF Download: 218 |
||||
