VALIDATION OF SURFACE IRRIGATION MODEL SIRMOD UNDER CLAY LOAM SOIL CONDITIONS IN EGYPT | ||||
| Misr Journal of Agricultural Engineering | ||||
| Article 16, Volume 26, Issue 3, July 2009, Page 1299-1317 PDF (507.13 K) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/mjae.2009.108699 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
| H. M. Mehana1; K. F. El-Bagoury2; M. M. Hussein,1; A.M. El-Gindy2 | ||||
| 1Water Relations & Field Irr. Dept. National Research Centre, Cairo, Egypt. | ||||
| 2Agri. Eng. Dep., Fac. of Agric. Ain Shams Univ., Cairo, Egypt | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| Surface irrigation (gravity) is the most dominant method currently accounts for 80-85% of irrigation water use in Egypt and surface application is by far the dominant irrigation method applied throughout the world. However, water use efficiencies with surface irrigation methods tend to be low. In recent years a number of surface irrigation simulation models for assessing surface irrigation system performance have been developed. One of the most commonly used models SIRMOD, developed by Utah State University, has seen wide use and evaluation throughout the world particularly by researchers and has been shown to offer potential for increasing surface irrigation water use efficiencies. The use of the SIRMOD model as a management tool for improving irrigation efficiencies was found to be a valuable aid. This study aims to validate SIRMOD model for using in Egypt under clay loam soil conditions. The SIRMOD model adequately describes advance and recession times and infiltrated depth under experimental site conditions for the furrow irrigation practice. In particular, for the experimental site the SIRMOD model provided acceptable predictions for 75 m and 50 m furrow lengths under 0.2% field slope, and for 100 m, 75 m and 50 m furrow lengths under 0.5% field slope at the 1st irrigation. For that, the good predicted values were for the later irrigations than the first one, due to the good relationship between the predicted and measured infiltration depths obtained from SIRMOD model which has high accuracy degree for furrow irrigation management decisions. Generally, predicted advance, recession times and infiltrated depth were highly correlating with measured one at 0.2% field slope more than 0.5% field slope for the two irrigations. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| SIRMOD model; Furrow irrigation; Soybean; Clay loam sol | ||||
| References | ||||
|
ASCE (1978). Describing irrigation efficiency and uniformity. J. Irrig.Drain. Div. 104 (1) 35-41.
Burt C.M.; A.J. Clemmens; T.S. Strelkof; K.H. Solomon; R.D. Bliesner; L.A. Hardy; T.A. Howell and D.E. Eisnerhauer (1997). Irrigation performance measures: Efficiency and uniformity. J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 123 (6) 423-442
Rogers D. H. (1995). Managing furrow irrigation systems. IRRIGATION MANAGEMENT S E R I E S, University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
Faulkner R.D; J. Douglas and D. MacLeod (1998). The Hydrology of Surface Irrigation for Cotton. Proceedings of National IAA Conference “Water is Gold”. Brisbane, May 1998, pp373-381. ISBN 0 7242 7281 X.
Hornbuckle, J. W. and E. W. Christen (2005). Use of SIRMOD as a Quasi Real Time Surface Irrigation Decision Support System. MODSIM 2005 International Congress on Modelling and Simulation. Melbourne, Australia, Modelling and Simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand.
McClymont, D.; S. Raine and R. Smith (1996). The Prediction of Furrow Irrigation Performance using the Surface Irrigation Model SIRMOD. 13th National Conference. Irrigation Association of Australia. Adelaide.
McClymont, D. and R. Smith (1996). Infiltration Parameters from Optimization on Furrow Irrigation Advance Data. Irrigation Science. 17:15-22.
Pereira L.S. (1999). Higher performance through combined improvements in irrigation methods and scheduling: a discussion. Agric. Water Manage. 40 (2) 153-169.
Walker, W. (1998). SIRMOD – Surface Irrigation Modeling Software. UtahStateUniversity.
Walker, W. and G. Skogerboe (1987). Surface Irrigation Theory and Practice. Prentice-Hall, New York.
USDA. (1997). SRFR v3. US Department of Agriculture. US Water Conservation Laboratory, Phoenix. AZ. | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 138 PDF Download: 191 |
||||
