CHEMICAL ASSESSMENT OF FARMED AND NATURAL FISH | ||||
| Kafrelsheikh Veterinary Medical Journal | ||||
| Article 1, Volume 10, Issue 1, April 2012, Page 1-13 PDF (348.16 K) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/kvmj.2012.108739 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
| Ahmad A. Hamza* 1; Ibraheim Aman2; Yehia Ali2; Nader Moustafa2 | ||||
| 1Food hygiene. Fac. Of Vet Med., Kafrelsheikh Univ., Egypt | ||||
| 2Food control Dep. Fac. Of Vet Med., Kafrelsheikh Univ., Egypt | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| 160 random samples of natural Tilapia nilotica (NT), farmed Tilapia nilotica (FT), natural Mugil cephalus (NM) and farmed Mugil cephalus (FM) (40 of each) were collected from eight fish farms and Alborolos lake in Kafr El-sheikh governorate through 12 months. The collected samples were subjected to chemical examinations to evaluate the effect of rearing conditions and fish types on nutritional value and quality of the examined fish. The study revealed that the farming rearing conditions leads to a significant higher fat and protein percent in farmed fish than natural fish while the Mugil cephalus species were higher than tilapia nilotica in fat and protein percent. | ||||
Highlights | ||||
| ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| Tilapia nilotica; Mugil cephalus; fat%; protein% | ||||
| Full Text | ||||
|
| ||||
| References | ||||
|
| ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 122 PDF Download: 195 |
||||
