EFFECT OF SOIL SURFACE COMPACTION PRESSURE AND COMPACTING CYLINDER SURFACE SHAPES ON BORDER IRRIGATION EFFICIENCY

Kassem, M. A.; Ghonimy, M. I.; Abdel-Rahman, G. M.

doi:10.21608/mjae.2009.109496

	EFFECT OF SOIL SURFACE COMPACTION PRESSURE AND COMPACTING CYLINDER SURFACE SHAPES ON BORDER IRRIGATION EFFICIENCY
Misr Journal of Agricultural Engineering
Article 15, Volume 26, Issue 2, April 2009, Page 797-817 PDF (365.88 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/mjae.2009.109496
View on SCiNiTO
Authors
M. A. Kassem¹; M. I. Ghonimy²; G. M. Abdel-Rahman¹
¹Assoc. Prof., Ag. Eng. Dept., Fac. of Ag.., Cairo Univ., Egypt.
²Prof., Ag. Eng. Dept., Fac. of Ag.., Cairo Univ., Egypt.
Abstract
A field experiment was carried out at the Experimental Station Farm, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo University. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of different levels of soil surface compaction pressure (P) (15, 22.5, 30, 37.5 kPa) and compacting cylinder surface shapes (C) with protrusion spaces (5, 10, 15 and 20 cm) on: the infiltration rate (IR), percentage of water losses by deep percolation (DPP), percentage of soil moisture defect (SMD), total advance time (AT), water distribution uniformity (Du), water application efficiency (Ea), the corn crop yield (Cy) and the water use efficiency (WUE). All data were collected during the summer seasons of 2004 and 2005 for corn crop. For the compacted soil surface, the values of IR, DPP, SMD and AT decreased by increasing the soil surface compacting to 22.5 kPa and by increasing protrusion space to 15 cm. The values of Du and Ea increased by increasing the soil surface compacting to 22.5 kPa and by increasing protrusion space to 15 cm. The best Cy and WUE were obtained at soil surface compacting (P2) 22.5 kPa, with any compaction cylinder surface shape.


References
Allen, R.R. and A.D. Schneirder. 1992 Furrow water intake reduction with surge irrigation or traffic compaction . J. Applied Engineering in Agriculture . ASAE.8(4):455-460 Anter, I.; M. Negmand and M. I. Mecheal. 1987. Analysis methods of agricultural soils. Soil and Water Res. Inst.Agric.Res.Center., Tech. Report(8):1-22. Boone, F.S.1988. Whether and other environmental factors influencing cropresponses to tillage and traffic. Soil and Tillage Research (11):283-324. EWUP, Egypt Water Use and Management Project. 1984. Improving Egypt system in the old lands. EWUP Final Report International Press:85p. Gemtos, T. A. and T.H. Lellis . 1997. Effect of soil compaction , water and organic mater on emergence and initial growth of cotton and surge beet. J. Agric. Eng. Resch. 66(4):121-137 Ghonimy, M. I. 2003. Analytical approach to energy balance in seed-bed preparation for corn crop. Misr J. Ag. Eng., 20 (1): 1-17. Hansen, V.E.; O. W. Israelson and G. E. Stringham. 1980. Irrigation principles and practices. John. Willey and Sons, Inc.N.Y James,L.C.1988.Principles of Farm Irrigation System Design. New York. Willey:230p. Schwankl, L. J.; N. S. Raghuwanshi, and W. W. Wallender. 2000. Furrow irrigation performance under spatially varying conditions. J. of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, ASCE 126(6): 355-361. Soane, B.D.; J.W. Dickson and D.J.Campbell.1982. Incidence and control of compaction in crop production . Soil and Tillage Reseach .12(3):13-36 Voorhees, W.B.1987. Assessment of soil susceptibility to compaction using soil and climatic data. Soil and Tillage Research.10(3):29-38.
Statistics Article View: 92 PDF Download: 137