Clinical significance of microRNA 126 in diabetic retinopathy in type 2 diabetes mellitus | ||||
| Journal of Recent Advances in Medicine | ||||
| Article 10, Volume 1, Issue 2, July 2020, Page 128-135 PDF (940.89 K) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/jram.2020.24735.1042 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
Nashwa Kamel  1; Nabila Ayoub2; Radwa Ibrahim3; Ahmed Ghalwash4; Nervana Khalaf1
| ||||
| 1Clinical Pathology Department, Research Institute of Ophthalmology, Giza, Egypt. | ||||
| 2Clinical Pathology Department, Faculty of Medicine for Girls, Cairo, Al-Azhar University, Egypt | ||||
| 3Clinical Pathology Department, Faculty of Medicine for Girls, Cairo, Al-Azhar University, Egypt. | ||||
| 4Ophthalmology Department, Research Institute of Ophthalmology, Giza, Egypt. | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| Background: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a group of metabolic disorders characterized by chronic hyperglycemia. It is caused by defective insulin production or resistance of the cells to insulin. The chronic hyperglycemia leads to damage of different organs, especially eyes, kidneys, nerves, heart, and blood vessels. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small non-coding regulatory ribonucleic acids (RNA). Many studies have showed the association between miRNA 126 and complications of DM including diabetic retinopathy (DR). Objective: Assessing the ability of circulating miRNA 126 to be used as diagnostic biomarker of both proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) and non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR). Patients and methods: This case-control study was conducted on 20 DR (PDR & NPDR) patients, 20 DM patients without DR and 20 apparently healthy controls who were recruited from Research Institute of Ophthalmology - RIO. Identification and quantification of plasma miRNA126 was performed by real-time PCR. Results: MiRNA 126 expression is significantly decreased in PDR group when compared to healthy control. Its expression in PDR is less than in NPDR, expression in NPDR is less than in DMC, and expression in healthy people is higher than in the other groups (P value < 0.001). ROC curve was done for healthy control group versus DMC, PDR and NPDR groups and showed that the area under the curve (AUC) was 1.0 for all groups with sensitivity and specificity 100%, confidence interval (CI) was 95% with upper and lower limit (1.0-1.0). Best cut off point of miRNA-126 was 5.44, 4.44, 4.88 for DMC, PDR and NPDR respectively. There is also a high significant increase between each group and control regarding hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c). There is a significant increase between PDR and control regarding triglycerides (TG). Conclusion: miRNA 126 can differentiate between the PDR, NPDR, DMC and control group and could be considered a non-invasive diagnostic parameter. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| biomarker; diabetic retinopathy; MicroRNA 126 | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 211 PDF Download: 437 |
||||
