Graphical Presentation of some Peanut Genotypes by Comparing Two Patterns of Biplot Analysis العرض البياني لبعض التراکيب الوراثية للفول السوداني بمقارنة نموذجين من تحليل المحاور الثنائية | ||||
| Journal of Plant Production | ||||
| Article 3, Volume 11, Issue 8, August 2020, Page 697-705 PDF (976.07 K) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/jpp.2020.112895 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
M. W. Sh. Mahmoud1; Eman M. A. Hussein  2; K. M. Aboelkassem1; Hoda E. A. Ibrahim2
| ||||
| 1Oil Crop Res. Dep., Field Crop Res. Inst., Agric. Res. Cen., Giza | ||||
| 2Central Lab., For Design and Stat., Anal. Res., Agric. Res. Cen., Giza | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| The present work was carried out at the Agriculture Research Station of Shandwell during the two successive seasons of 2018 and 2019 to assess the yield potential of 20 peanut genotypes. Genotype by trait biplot (GT) and genotype by yield*trait (GYT) analyses were automated to obtain information on genotypes for selection based on multiple traits (nine traits), and appreciate the relationships between these attributes. Applying biplot analyses to the multiple trait data revealed that genotype by yield*trait (GYT) graphically facilitated visual, more effective and clear in providing information about the superior genotypes and the relationships between the yield and its components genotype compared to trait biplot (GT). Also, ranking genotypes was tested by a superiority index that collective yield and other target traits with the GYT biplot. In the GYT biplot, yield-trait combinations clearly appeared that the best genotypes defined for all traits, whereas in the genotype × trait (GT) biplot, the best genotypes were not known for all traits. The promising genotypes being No. 7, 16 and 17 are clearly observed using the GYT biplot technique. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| Peanut; selection; GT biplot graph; GYT biplot graph | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 193 PDF Download: 577 |
||||
