The outcome of femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis compared to conventional laser insitu keratomileusis in myopic patients | ||||
Sohag Medical Journal | ||||
Article 9, Volume 24, Issue 3, July 2020, Page 56-62 PDF (937.06 K) | ||||
Document Type: Original Article | ||||
DOI: 10.21608/smj.2020.39264.1180 | ||||
![]() | ||||
Authors | ||||
Sarah Gamal Fathi ![]() | ||||
1Ophthalmology department faculty of medicine sohag university | ||||
2ophthalmology department ,faculty of medicine,sohag university | ||||
3ophthalmology department,faculty of medicine,sohag university | ||||
Abstract | ||||
Abstract Introduction: This is a prospective comparative clinical study conducted to assess the safety , effectiveness, and complications of Intralase femtosecond laser (FSL) compared to Moria M2 microkeratome (MK) in high myope. Methods : This study consisted of 51 myopic eyes, divided into two groups( A & B) . Twenty-five eyes in group A in which the flap was created by Intralase FSL, while twenty-six eyes in group B in which the flap was created by Moria M2 MK. Refractive , keratometric and flap complications were compared preoperative and 6 months postoperative by using the intraoperative subtraction pachymetry . (Scheimpflug imaging (CSO, Florence, Italy). Results: No substantial difference was found as regarding postoperative manifest sphere ,astigmatic and keratometry .In group A mean postoperative actual flap thickness was98.12 ± 16.1 μm and in group B it was100.6 ± 20.1 μm with statistically significant difference P value( 0.001). Conclusion: Both the femtosecond laser and the mechanical microkeratome are safe and effective in correcting myopia, with no statistically significant difference during 6-month follow-up between the two groups. The femtosecond laser has better flap creation than the microkeratome . Key words :FSL ,Moria M2 ,Myope | ||||
Keywords | ||||
Key words :FSL; Moria M2; Myope | ||||
Supplementary Files
|
||||
Statistics Article View: 226 PDF Download: 285 |
||||