Posterior colpotomy versus laparoscopy for surgical management of ectopic pregnancy | ||||
| The Egyptian Journal of Fertility of Sterility | ||||
| Article 4, Volume 24, Issue 3 - Serial Number 11106352, September 2020, Page 28-32 PDF (1.24 MB) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/egyfs.2020.116344 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Author | ||||
Elsayed Elshamy, Hamdy Talkhan , Hanan Nabil  
| ||||
| Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gama Hospital, Al- Khobar, Saudi Arabia. | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| Background and aim: to assess the the posterior colpotomy ap- proach versus laparoscopic approach in the surgical management of ectopic pregnancy in stable patients. Methods: A prospective cohort study conducted on 40 women with ectopic pregnancy, divided into two groups; Group 1 included 20 patients for whom laparoscopic salpingectomy was done and group 2 included 20 patients for whom salpingectomy was done via pos- terior colpotomy approach. Operative and postoperative data were collected and analyzed. Results: Operative time was significantly shorter in group 2; 45 ± 8.1 min versus 56.5 ± 13 min in group 1(P<0.05). Postoperative pain scoring was significantly lower in group 2 (5.7±1.1 vs 6.8±1.6 in group 2 and group 1 respectively) (P<0.05). Urgent laparotomy was performed for one patient in group 1and two patients in group 2 (P>0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding patient characteristics, clinical data, hospital stay and the need for blood transfusion. Conclusion: Posterior colpotomy is a promising approach for surgi- cal treatment of tubal ectopic pregnancy especially if laparoscopy is not available. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| Keywords: posterior colpotomy; ectopic pregnancy; salpingectomy; tubal pregnancy | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 224 PDF Download: 239 |
||||
