Comparative Evaluation of the Push-out bond strength of Nano-formulations of MTA and Portland cement.
Nashaat, Y., Roshdy, N. (2020). Comparative Evaluation of the Push-out bond strength of Nano-formulations of MTA and Portland cement.. EKB Journal Management System, 66(Issue 4 - October (Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics)), 2807-2814. doi: 10.21608/edj.2020.40546.1243
yousra Mohamed Nashaat; Nehal Nabil Roshdy. "Comparative Evaluation of the Push-out bond strength of Nano-formulations of MTA and Portland cement.". EKB Journal Management System, 66, Issue 4 - October (Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics), 2020, 2807-2814. doi: 10.21608/edj.2020.40546.1243
Nashaat, Y., Roshdy, N. (2020). 'Comparative Evaluation of the Push-out bond strength of Nano-formulations of MTA and Portland cement.', EKB Journal Management System, 66(Issue 4 - October (Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics)), pp. 2807-2814. doi: 10.21608/edj.2020.40546.1243
Nashaat, Y., Roshdy, N. Comparative Evaluation of the Push-out bond strength of Nano-formulations of MTA and Portland cement.. EKB Journal Management System, 2020; 66(Issue 4 - October (Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics)): 2807-2814. doi: 10.21608/edj.2020.40546.1243

Comparative Evaluation of the Push-out bond strength of Nano-formulations of MTA and Portland cement.

Egyptian Dental Journal
Article 12, Volume 66, Issue 4 - October (Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics), October 2020, Page 2807-2814  XML PDF (684.68 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/edj.2020.40546.1243
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
yousra Mohamed Nashaat email orcid 1; Nehal Nabil Roshdyorcid 2
1departement of endodontics,faculty of dentistry,october 6 university,cairo,egypt
2Associate Professor of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate and compare the push-out bond strength of nano-formulation of ProRoot MTA (NPMTA) and Portland cement (NPC) with commercially available ProRootMTA (PMTA) and Portland cement (PC) aiming to develop a new root-end filling/ perforation repair material.
Methods: Forty root-dentin slices prepared from freshly extracted single-rooted teeth were randomly allocated into four groups (n = 10) according to the tested cements: PMTA, PC, NPMTA and NPC. The root canal lumens were instrumented and filled with the test materials. The Universal testing machine was used for push-out bond strength evaluation. The maximum force employed at the time of dislodgment was recorded and the specimens were inspected under scanning electron microscope at x25 magnification to detect the nature of the bond failure. Kruskal–Wallis test was applied for the comparison between the groups. Mann-Whitney U test was used for pairwise comparison.
Results: The mean push-out bond strength ± standard deviation values of PMTA, PC, NPMTA and NPC were 1.33 ± 0.4, 0.91 ± 0.34, 1.1 ± 0.39 and 2.22 ± 0.43 respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the means of PMTA, PC and NPMTA (p=0.529) but the mean of NPC was significantly higher than the three groups (p=0.012). Under stereomicroscope PMTA, PC and NPMTA groups showed a majority of adhesive failure, while NPC showed a majority of mixed type failure.
Conclusions: The force needed for NPMTA displacement is similar to PMTA and PC and significantly lower than the force required for NPC displacement.
Keywords
Adaptation; Dislodgement; Leakage; Nano Materials; Root End Sealing
Statistics
Article View: 241
PDF Download: 280