Comparison of isofluraneand sevofluranein anesthesia for day case surgeries using classical laryngeal mask airway | ||||
SVU-International Journal of Medical Sciences | ||||
Article 6, Volume 2, Issue 1, January 2019, Page 31-35 PDF (166.42 K) | ||||
Document Type: Original research articles | ||||
DOI: 10.21608/svuijm.2019.120934 | ||||
View on SCiNiTO | ||||
Authors | ||||
Hasnaa A. Ahmed* ; Mohamed A. Soliman; Salah M. Asida | ||||
Anaesthesia, Intensive Care And Pain Management Department,Faculty of Medicine, Qena University Hospital, South Valley University,Qena,Egypt | ||||
Abstract | ||||
Background: Advances in anesthetic induction agents and airway management have contributed to the success of day case surgeries. An ideal day-case anesthetic agent should have rapid smooth induction; provide optimum surgical conditions with rapid recovery and minimal side effects. Objectives: Comparing isoflurane and sevoflurane as maintenance anaesthetic agents in day case surgeries. Patients and methods:This study was done on 100 patients scheduled for operations under general anesthesia divided in two groups of maintenance anaesthesia (isoflurane and sevoflurane) 50 patients in each. Results: MAP was with more decrease in group B (75.8±7.2) than group A (90.2±8.8). LMA hyper- reactivity score was with more decrease in mild (20%) and moderate (6%) in group A than group B, mild (46%) and moderate (8%). LMA removal (min) was statistically significant between two groups A (8.8±1.2) B (5.1±.8). Emergence was statistically significant with (0% of cases) and (24% of cases) for groups A and B respectively. PONV score, was statistically significant with negative (88%, 98%) and mild (12 %, 2%) for groups A and B respectively. discharge time, was statistically significant with (21.1±8.3 hours, 9.4±2.5 hours) for groups A and B respectively. Conclusions:Sevoflurane and isoflurane are suitable for day care anaesthesia. | ||||
Keywords | ||||
Isoflurane; Svoflurane; Laryngeal mask airway; Day case surgery | ||||
Statistics Article View: 133 PDF Download: 285 |
||||